Talk:Kremvax

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The content the edit warring is going on over is in my opinion POV and needs to either be removed or significantly reworked. Everyking 01:23, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)

How would you recommend reworking the paragraph in question? --Aika 16:45, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)

"it is believed by many that years of speculation that totalitarianism would prove unable to maintain its grip" - References? ; "as Yeltsin and the new Russian revolutionaries of glasnost and perestroika" - definately POV ; Willard 19:09, 26 July 2005 (UTC)

Months have passed since Willard's perfectly reasonable request, and no reference is forthcoming. I've removed the particularly POV sentence at the end - it's typical Eric S. Raymond ranting; such fact-free POV doesn't belong here. -- Middenface 00:35, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

I fixed a couple more howling POV problems with the remaining part of the last paragraph, but I'm still very unhappy about it. We wouldn't, surely, let some other random website's article claim it had such an important part in history without a molecule of evidence , so I don't know why we let this one either. Barring sources cited, I think the whole last paragraph should be removed as unverified and questionable. -- Middenface 00:46, 20 November 2005 (UTC)