Talk:Kong Hee

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

• If good points is also mentioned, why delete a negative point about Kong hee? The leaving of his former Anglican Church is cited in that widely-published magazine. There's no question about that vaildity. Both side of views must be represented, but it's seemed bias towards one side & hence POV.

How to NPOV'ed on these points:

Tried my best to NPOV'ed it:

• "an uncompromising" message on "Godly character and Holiness" (that was not mine)

strongly on promoting character and Charismatic Christianity.

• leaving his Anglican Church because of "some disagreements with the Anglican Church" (this was mine)

leaving his Anglican Church because of disputes between the Anglican Church and himself on both sides.

Oh ya, removed POV tag (Not "NPOV" tag, Excuse my typo)

Contents 1 Removed paragraph 2 Plagiarism 3 Doctor title 4 See also 5 AfD discussion

[edit] Removed paragraph

I've just moved the following pragraph here (after deleting it and having it reinserted):

"According to its critics, they pointed out in an article¹ that Rev. Kong Hee spoke of leaving his former Anglican Church as an ordained deacon in his early days because of disputes between the Anglican Church and himself on both sides."

My first problem is what it means, but I think that I can sort that out; it's either:

"It has been claimed that Kong Hee has said that he had thought of leaving the Anglican Church when he was a young ordained deacon because of disputes between him and the Church.¹"

or it's:

"It has been claimed that Kong Hee has said that he left the Anglican Church when he was a young ordained deacon because of disputes between him and the Church.¹"

Whichever it is, so what? What significance is this supposed to have? Moreover, what disputes? If this has any significance, it's presumably the nature of the disputes that matters. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 12:24, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Plagiarism

Please have a look at this page: http://www.chc.org.sg/english/church.cfm

There seems to be quite a bit on Kong Hee's wiki page which read similarly to what's written on the church's official intro page. Yuyudevil 04:58, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Doctor title

According to Doctor of Theology, it is "not customary" to use the title Dr. (Doctor) for Th.D holder. Is there any different view on this? --Vsion 07:16, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

CHC website does not use Dr., it just use Rev. Kong Hee. We should follow the proper title of his. Use the standards of Doctor of Theology, some ministries of CHC uses doctor and some do not. I would like to repeat myself again, just follow what the official manner is. --Terence Ong 13:48, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] See also

What's the rational for linking to those under "See also"? If there is relevance, the name should appear under the main article section.

[edit] AfD discussion

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kong Hee  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  15:23, 8 April 2006 (UTC)