Talk:Kleercut

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

[edit] Seems Non-NPOV

This article seems to be written from an anti-Kimberly-Clark point of view. Although the evidence may be accurate, the diction of the author speaks from an environmental viewpoint. The following phrases are not particularily neutral:

  • "The Kleercut campaign is an international corporate campaign to pressure Kimberly-Clark to clean up its act."
  • "The story and the networks behind this campaign are a great example of the alignment of the progressive technology and free software community and the environmental and grassroots communities." (Again, this phrase promotes environmental views.)
  • "...destroys ancient forests around the world." (Not only is this non-NPOV, it is also not specific.)

Not only is it not neutral, this article only depicts the environmentalist point of view. Further discussion is welcome. Eduard Gherkin 01:59, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] SFI - not relevant for this entry.

According to the article the Kleercut campaign demands that the companies in question; "Turn to Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) eco-certified forestry operations for what virgin wood fibers it does use." Why is the forestry certification currently in use not relevant? It seem like is is the central point. KAM 18:14, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../k/l/e/Talk%7EKleercut_db0e.html"