User talk:Kigoe
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Hill.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Hill.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 18:48, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
- Image provided by school for use on entry, and I'll work to get written permission to re-upload it. -- KiGOE | talk 22:36, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Michael Kight
Hi there, if you ever have any questions on Wikipedia's policies, I'd be happy to help. Just drop me a note on my talk page. Cheers. --lightdarkness (talk) 01:25, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
As I said on the talk page, you really need to look at WP:BIO and understand that criteria. Vegaswikian 02:17, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy deletion is a policy that allows well defined types of articles to be removed without discussion. The reasons that are acceptable have been voted on with a consensus of editors supporting those reasons. Vegaswikian 02:33, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
- I did read your reasons for not deleting on the talk page. Nothing that you wrote there provided any assertion of meeting the WP:BIO guidelines. So, in my opinion, you were given a chance to justify keeping of the article and I believed that what you wrote still justified the speedy deletion. Vegaswikian 02:44, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
- I stated no reason given since you did not provide a reason that justified keeping the article. If an article is nominated for a speedy deletion for a valid reason, then there is no need to use AfD. In fact, speedy deletion is on of the tools usede to keep the number of articles discussed in AfD to a reasonable number. Any administrator can delete any article, but that action is always subject to some form of consensus review. When you reposted this article, the consensus review became the discussion on AfD. Vegaswikian 02:54, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
- I did read your reasons for not deleting on the talk page. Nothing that you wrote there provided any assertion of meeting the WP:BIO guidelines. So, in my opinion, you were given a chance to justify keeping of the article and I believed that what you wrote still justified the speedy deletion. Vegaswikian 02:44, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] B o Rts
Notice that the specfic rights you mention only come from the first 8, not 10. ;) John wesley 12:55, 18 May 2006 (UTC) Commoners think BoR are 1st 10 because elementary sch teachers tell me so, but they are not lawyers who have to sue the guvmint to protect indiv rts. :( John wesley 12:55, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
