Talk:Keshia Chanté

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to musicians and musical groups on Wikipedia.

Contents

[edit] Chart's name

Is it better to state which countdowns her songs were on, like YTV's Hit List and MuchMusic's COuntdown, rather than just say YTV and MuchMusic? Yelly.telus.14 06:48, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Keshia Chante - Improper Comments and Information

This article contains improper comments and information that is inappropriate for an encyclopedia! There are also many spelling mistakes made like the one made about a video made for the "singel" (supposed to be single) Unpredictable. This also contains malicious information about Keshia Chante, such as perfoming certain acts and questioning her intents and integrity as an artist. Please take your hate elsewhere, for Wikipedia is a place of knowledge and interest . - Someone please edit this article! Renaissance Man - look it up 02:05, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you!

Thank you for cleaning up this article and updating it to Wikipedia standards. Best of luck to Keshia Chante, and despite what I've heard, don't forget about Brampton, Ontario!

[edit] Repeated Blanking

Someone keeps blanking the image and certain other information on this article. If there is a problem with it, please explain why. Otherwise, it is considered vandalism as per Wikipedia policy. See quote below...

Blanking: Removing all or significant parts of articles (sometimes replacing the removed content with profanities) is a common vandal edit. However, significant content removals are usually not considered to be vandalism where the reason for the removal of the content is readily apparent by examination of the content itself, or where a non-frivolous explanation for the removal of apparently legitimate content is provided, linked to, or referenced in an edit summary. Due to the possibility of unexplained good-faith content removal, template:test1a or template:blank, as appropriate, should normally be used as initial warnings for ordinary content removals not involving any circumstances that would merit stronger warnings.

I have replaced the unexplained blanked content for now. I believe it should stay there unless an explanation can be given! djsik 19:58, 17 November 2006 (UTC)