Talk:Keith Emerson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Boy...that off-color overexposed awful image of Keith Emerson is just SO much better than the prior image - if Keith saw that he might have preferred dying first not to have this pathetic piece of visual drek he was kind enough to do with a fan posted and distributed worldwide on Wikipedia. Congratulations on finding that lovely free image. Tvccs 01:51, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- Tvccs, this kind of comment is what is really harmfull to Wikipedia. Be respectful to other editors. Avoid using improper humor. --Abu Badali 02:24, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- To find you, after the massive attack you have launched on my images, to be discussing respectfulness, I cannot find the words. It would be my hope that users who find and substitute free images would find ones of far better quality before replacing same. I have little doubt Keith Emerson would abhor the image being used here being distributed as a primary image worldwide. Tvccs 02:39, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- If he abhors it, he has only to give us a freely-licensed replacement and we'll use that instead. —Chowbok ☠ 02:41, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- And as a photographer, I would never in a hundred years have posted such an image for publication - it's fine where it was, as a nice fan image, but has no place being used as it now is on Wikipedia. Tvccs 02:46, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- If he abhors it, he has only to give us a freely-licensed replacement and we'll use that instead. —Chowbok ☠ 02:41, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- To find you, after the massive attack you have launched on my images, to be discussing respectfulness, I cannot find the words. It would be my hope that users who find and substitute free images would find ones of far better quality before replacing same. I have little doubt Keith Emerson would abhor the image being used here being distributed as a primary image worldwide. Tvccs 02:39, 29 November 2006 (UTC)