User talk:Kchase02

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives
14 March 2006 - 19 June 20 June - July August - September October 2006 -

[edit] Brisbane Catholic

We're working on sourcing it. It's being written by , the creators of the show, who are also the stars, so we can't really imagine how to reference it. DarkTurtle 09:38, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Patrick O'Riley

Hey, I am new to the user pages and I'm not sure what I did wrong on my page. If you could explain that would be cool. Thanks.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by PatrickORiley (talk • contribs).

You're fine. It was my mistake. I came across your page during a maintenance task and thought you created a page about yourself in the space for articles (without the "User:" prefix), so I tagged it for speedy deletion. It's fine where it is.--Kchase T 18:12, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] re: User:86.148.84.73

It was another of the penis images vandals that have put the featured articles under assaults these last few days. They are getting more deceitful. I count 3 edits that didn't involve getting or removing penis images on the current FA since it went live! Circeus 01:28, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. I've been thinking of uploading a smaller copy of that enormous scrotum closeup, since it's size in scrotum is quite small, and it's usually enlarged considerably for vandalism. Your thoughts?--Kchase T 01:32, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Input

In regards to the comment you made on this AfD Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/James_Kim_(timeline_of_death). Could you also stop by and give your opinion here Talk:James_Kim#Timeline.3F as we're having a consensus issue.--Crossmr 19:04, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Adminship

Congratulations, you are now an administrator! If you haven't done so already, now is the time to read Wikipedia:Administrators' how-to guide and the pages linked from the Wikipedia:Administrators' reading list before using any of your admin abilities. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me, or at the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard. Best wishes, Warofdreams talk 14:16, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you, Warofdreams.--Kchase T 16:45, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations! Have fun with the tools! If you ever need help, feel free to contact me. =) Nishkid64 15:27, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, Nishkid.--Kchase T 16:45, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Well done! Let me know if you need any help with admin tasks. Regards and happy mopping! (aeropagitica) 16:34, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, I will.--Kchase T 16:45, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Mazel tov. And if I ever get confrontational again, now there's something you can do about it! - crz crztalk 17:09, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

lol. Thanks, crz!--Kchase T 17:12, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for voting

I appreciate the feedback that I received during the RfA process. Unfortunately, I withdrew my candidacy. However, your participation is appreciated. I have made my New Years Resolution (effective immediately) to attempt to vote on at least 50 WP:XFD/week (on at least 5 different days), to spend 5 hours/week on WP:NPP, to be active in WikiProjects and to change the emphasis of my watchlist from editorial oversight to vandalism prevention. I have replaced several links that I had on my list to some that I think are more highly vandalized (Tiger Woods, Barry Bonds, my congressman Jesse Jackson, Jr., my senator Barrack Obama and Jesse Jackson). My first day under my newly turned leaf was about what I hope a typical day to be. I quickly found a vandal, made a few editorial changes to Donald Trump, voted at WP:CFD and WP:AFD, continued attempted revitalization of Wikipedia:WikiProject_Chicago and proposed a new stub type as a result of WP:NPP patrol. I hope this will broaden my wikipedia experience in a way that makes me a better administrator candidate. I hope to feel more ready to be an admin in another 3000 or so edits. TonyTheTiger 16:11, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Simpson vandal

Hey, I see you removed the ip that keeps deleting cats from the List of characters from The Simpsons, since they appeared to have stopped. That's fine, but I would like to alert you to the fact that they are kind of intermittent (I seem to have been the one to catch them every time, since I have the list watchlisted). They usually do these deletions once every few days, but it is always the exact same thing. So they may not actually have stopped. Just a head's up. Natalie 20:59, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Sure. You can add {{longterm4im}} to their talk page if it continues. Actually, they seem to be productive, now.--Kchase T 21:10, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Yargh. I don't know what the vendetta is. Thanks for the tip on that template. They apparently have a static IP, so a block could actually work, but I would like to give them a chance to knock it off. (If I did relist them, it could go on the longterm noticeboard, yes?) Natalie 21:22, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

No, just send it to AIV. We can handle it there. Thanks, Natalie.--Kchase T 21:27, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:Westtexasman

You have blocked the User:Westtexasman. So far as I can tell the newbee was doing a right thing - removing unsourced negative information about a living person. See WP:BLP. Quite possible he is somehow involved in the matter the more reasons not to block him, IMHO.

Unless there is something I do not understood, I propose to unblock the guy Alex Bakharev 05:29, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, looks like he had good intentions and an edit war without any explanation got started. Sorry I was a bit happy on the trigger finger. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.--Kchase T 05:33, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks! Alex Bakharev 05:45, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] IP vandal 20.137.52.231

Hi, Actually this IP was warned with a test3 in November - did you not notice? Take care and thanks for your work here! Kla'quot 06:37, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I gave the test2 because the IP has a history of mixed contribs (some productive, some vandalism) and it may be shared amongst multiple people, though that's not completely clear from the whois info. Also, we're generally not supposed to block unless they've received the full range of warnings recently. See "Only list here if:" at WP:AIV and look at that list to see what I mean. Unrelatedly, the IP seems to have quit, now.--Kchase T 06:45, 15 December 2006 (UTC)