Talk:Kaur Methodology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Wiki Admin,

This article has obtained a reference. Please remove the warning. I agree that the title of the article maybe debatable but the methodology is well recognized.

At this stage, I'm unable to provide more detailed information on the methodology due to the lack of sufficient references and the inability of accessing to the relevant journals. However, the authentic citations are in the folloiwng and I have to rely on the field of the expertise to expand the article.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6V0D-3WM4WPP-4&_coverDate=04%2F30%2F1999&_alid=487714861&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_qd=1&_cdi=5644&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=268d980d37fd007fc09074927a983a66

http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/10/19/6528

Another issue that I would like to raise is that I suggest Wiki Admin to publish a referencing guideline on what reference can be cited and what can not. This will ensure the authenticity of wiki articles. If something can not be cited definitely, please issue a blacklist to the public

[edit] PROD removed

Kulwinder should have more than 5 days to defend this article. She has several articles to her name, so I'm surprised she didn't reference some of those. I agree the title may be somewhat grandiose, but I would like to see how this technology differs from "standard" SSADM. If it turns out that nothing very useful has been added, then delete it. Jpaulm 17:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] I vote to keep the article!

I think this is a valid article, I do NOT believe it should be deleted

JimmySmitts 09:16, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../k/a/u/Talk%7EKaur_Methodology_80f9.html"