User talk:Karmak
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] RE: 1980s reference
Please reconsider the source of information you have decided to use for the Beverly Hills High School article's Academics section. Deriving a conclusion from a 1980s analytic observance of the school may be highly inaccurate, as times and cultural demographics have gone through a significant change.
We should also question the accuracy of the website's copy of the excerpt of the book, as the owner of the website could have misplaced, and thereby distorting the context of the excerpt's meaning.CH1 01:45, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Case name, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.
- This mediation request was delisted before I had a chance to see it. I suspect that Gunbolt is the same person as "The MAN" and the same person who has been vandalizing the Beverly Hills High School article just to personally insult me!
- Somehow this person doesn't want to believe that there are wealthy students at Beverly Hills High School, which is very bizarre! It is no secret that wealthy people connected to the entertainment industry live in Beverly Hills and have children who go to the high school!Karmak
[edit] Info removed from BHHS Trivia
Some editor has been removing the Munitz trivia. Why should that be censored?
-
- I personally did not remove this. Perhaps someone thought that something that cannot be documented shuld not be in the article. But I can't be sure.Karmak
[edit] You need to stop being a nazi and placing moronic assumptions in the article. The MAN 17:31, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
You need to stop being a nazi and placing moronic assumptions in the article. The MAN 17:31, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Beverly Hills High School
Hey man, I've blocked User:The MAN for 3 hours for personal attacks, incivility, and that thing he pulled with your user page. If you have any further trouble, feel free to contact me. - FrancisTyers · 19:30, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your comment on my user page
What are you on about? I've avoided that article for about a month because your "contributions" to it are so hopeless and aggravating. I don't know why you left a message on my page about it. It was probably meant for someone else. Moncrief 22:54, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- I left a message on your page because I wanted to. Simple! Karmak
[edit] Your contributions
Please do not start an editing war on Beverly Hills High School. AS seen on your contribution list, you have historically been known to revert attempts by other users who are trying to correct the Beverly Hills High School article.
There is, for me, no outstanding problem with you in regards to this article. I've edited the new section because it does not fit the bill of Wikipedia. CH1 02:19, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
-
- As you may have noticed, people revert YOUR edits, not mine! You, (with 100 usernames) have been the only person to revert what I write!Karmak
[edit] BHHS
I've semiprotected the article and banned CH1 for 24 hours for personal attacks. The other users you mention have been banned by Will Beback I think. - FrancisTyers · 20:04, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
-
- Thanks for you help! Karmak
[edit] 1980s Section and your Accusations about me being a sockpuppet
Firstly, Calm Down. No one can understand you if you're going to fling such accusations with absolutely no logic in them at me.
I am not a sockpuppet of whomever you think is personally vandalizing user Will Beback. I am a new wikipedia.com member who began editing by looking over an article of a school that I attended in the nineties. I just found that the 1980s section needed more solid sources and references, specifically not from a website ran by an individual who lacks credibility.I am quite surprised that you would connect me to such racist and, (to me) quite offending names) such as the n word! I will ignore that, however, if you continue to do so, I will seek appropriate administrator assistence in user harassment. Quite a rude awakening for a first time Wikipedia user, I might say. Next time, please, consider your words before you type as; describing immature is highly incorrect and tactless, and truly shows a part of you that no one wants to see. It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Attacking another user back can only satisfy trolls or anger contributors and leads to general bad feeling. Please try to remain civil with your comment.
And then this?:
"I say Hellwing is a sock puppet because he has made about 15 edits to wikipedia, and most of them have involved requests for deleting pages, and the one request to un-protect the BHHS article. It is not likely that someone new to wikipedia would request unprotection and request that pages be deleted and nothing else. This person has been banned from editing wikipedia indefinately many times and he should not be allowed to request unprotection or request pages be deleted! Karmak 18:00, 15 September 2006 (UTC" -from you?
It is not likely that someone new to wikipedia would request unprotection and request that pages be deleted and nothing else My goodness! How do you know what a first time user does or doesn't do? Is Wikipedia.com a communist state? I don't know and can't understand what your source of anger is against me, but this is harassment.
This person has been banned from editing wikipedia indefinately many times and he should not be allowed to request unprotection or request pages be deleted And on what grounds? I am sensing that you are playing a role of a attack dog for the Beverly Hills High School article. Let me go back into your past edits...
You've literally been on a edit war with another user called Moncrief during June over a section about a journalist's column regarding Beverly Hills High School. Go into the discussion section, and , to me it seems, Moncrief and other users were correct, in that Joel Stein's reference wasn't NPOV. You know surprised me the most? The fact that you wouldn't let down! My edits were varied, even, as you accuse me of that It is not likely that someone new to wikipedia would request unprotection and request that pages be deleted and nothing else, however, your edits circumnavigate around the article Beverly Hills High School from april to september! From a first time user, and a user well-acquainted with Wikipedia by learning of its magic from the news, perspective, you believe Beverly Hills High School is your article and have all rights to gang up against other users who attempt to edit sections where they find it is not NPOV.
I'm going to remind you of a little thing I learned when reading a tutorial for new users. Don't be afraid of makign edits, be bold.
I'm erring to the side of being ACCURATE and CORRECT, and mostly, NPOV.
Hellwing 19:23, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re:Hellwing
I didn't accuse Hellwing of being a sockpuppet, I simply said the chances of people participating in AfD with such a low edit count increases the chances of them being one. I was assuming good faith, if you have evidence of him being a sockpuppet though, you should post it at WP:SSP. As for "sharing all my info about him" I don't have any info other than that he participated in an AfD I was involved in. If you suspect he is a sock you might want to look at the people who voted in the first AfD of the article and see if you think there is any connection between him and one of the people who voted in that. VegaDark 20:12, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Last Man
Hey could you add where Nietzsche stated a connection between the last man and the underground man to the article.1 Thanks LoveMonkey 03:28, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
