User talk:Kaimiddleton
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Brace yourself...
Ok here's the goofy canned greeting: Hello there! Welcome to Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Also: you can play and experiment all you want in the Sandbox. Welcome, and Happy editing!
Ok, now you can breathe. Your edits at Pikaia seem to indicate you are off to a good start. Also, you should sign your talk page edits with this --> --~~~~ Cheers! --DanielCD 20:46, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
Hi Kai, Glad to see you're on board here on wikipedia - the 9/11 pages need you! I've been trying to recruit people onto here to help but have a hard time getting people interested. You know me, but I'd rather not put my name on here. I live in Alameda with someone else you know. You tried to get them a job . . . - Bov 21:57, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
Hi Kai, I saw your mention of Noam Chomsky and thought you might be interested in reading this article. If nothing else it's very interesting. Whatever you might think about some of the material in the article, it is possible that this is how Chomsky actually decides what is worth researching and what isn't.Chomsky Talk to ya later. SkeenaR 03:32, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your efforts on the 'psuedoscience' issue. I haven't had time for the discussion on this but it seems like just the latest effort to try to discredit. Bov 19:41, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
AFD Scholars for 9/11 Truth SkeenaR 01:21, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up Kai, looks like you took care of it. A good way to keep track of all the changes is to go here and click on 'related changes' at the top and it lists all the changes made each day. Then you go through and see what needs to be . . . looked at. See you tonight? Bov 22:16, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Hello there. I thought you might want to check out this list of AFD's in case you weren't aware of them. Have a fun weekend! [1] SkeenaR 06:08, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks! I didn't know what an AFD was. Now I know. I'm also looking at the link Bov gave me. Kaimiddleton 07:14, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] "Googolplex is a cardinal number" means:
One is to first as googolplex is to... Georgia guy 23:51, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] AFD
This article could use your vote: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Citizens' Commission on 9-11--Striver 19:13, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Guild
Hi! I wonder if you are intrested in joining the Wikipedia:WikiProject Conspiracies Guild by signing the member chart. i would also apreciate any advices you might have on improving the Guild. Thanks :) --Striver 11:06, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Loose Change Now Being Promoted on Wikipedia
If you could check over on that page Loose Change (video) and discussion from time to time I would appreciate it. Bov 00:47, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 9/11 Truth Movement Page
Hi Kai, I added some images, so it looks a little better. I also noticed a bunch of little bizarre statements inserted into the text. Given that we know what's coming down the pike, it would be good to keep track of this page's contents. Bov 19:35, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Hi Kai: Just a note to commend you on your excellent post regarding those who are hungry for deletion of this page. Constructive content is the whole point of the encyclopedia, I agree, and I have had much of my 9/11 content sniped at and deleted by the destructive actions you describe. It might be a good idea to copy your comments (with minor modification) over to the "Scholars for 9/11 Truth" page, which is also up for deletion. I think it may be the Zogby poll that has brought this editing war into further intensity this week. Sincerely, --PureLogic 20:58, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Another AFD
I think that this may interest you: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gatekeeper (politics). Thanks, HK 07:04, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 9-11 conspiracy changes
I did outline the changes on the talk page. Please read and respond. --Mmx1 16:08, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 7/7 Truth Movement
Interested? - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedians_of_the_7/7_Truth_Movement - If so please ask those on here whom else you think would be interested. Thank you and keep up the great work.
[edit] Comments on film
I appreciate your thoughtful comments on the 9/11 film very much. Badagnani 09:01, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Svensk
Är du svensk? Jag fick det intrycket av att läsa [2] --Striver 10:26, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 911
fyi, I also oppose the deletion of (many) 911-related articles. — Xiutwel (talk) 23:56, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hi
Esperanza is just a fun place to do fun things, for fun people really. Unless your a nasty person you are invited! One of my favourite parts is the User Page Award program.--Andeh 10:58, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Crossing the Rubicon
Hello, Kai. My involvement in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crossing the Rubicon (Ruppert) was only to close the AfD after the usual five-day time period for discussion and delete the article after determining that the consensus was to do so. I'd gladly comply if you would like me to restore the content of the article into your userspace for you to work on. Some helpful pages on this are Wikipedia:Deletion policy, Wikipedia:Undeletion policy, and Wikipedia:Deletion process; still, another option is to use Wikipedia:Deletion review.
I'm glad you're thinking of joining Esperanza; your presence would be most welcome. :) Regards, Sango123 15:32, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Ackermann numbers
I noticed that the original HTML had the numbers ascending to the left, but when I looked at all the other examples of tetration to do the latex, the numbers ascended to the right, so I figured it was a typo or something. Personally, the only thing I know about tetration is what I read in order to understand the notation. --Carl (talk|contribs) 21:50, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
