Talk:Kai Tak Airport
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Hong Kong.
A project to help knowledgeable editors like you improve all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, please consider joining this project. Everyone is welcome! |
|
Hong Kong To-do:
|
|
 |
Kai Tak Airport is part of WikiProject Airports, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to airports. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
|
WikiProject Airports To-do:
|
|
|
|
|
 |
WikiProject Echo has identified Kai Tak Airport as a foreign language featured article. You may be able to improve this article with information from the Chinese language Wikipedia. |
Contents |
If anyone wants to use the "External Link" picture I put in the External Links area in the actual article body, be sure to get permission from the people who have the picture. ~ WHISPERTOME - WhisperToMe 01:47, August 13, 2003 (UTC)
What was the handling capacity (passenger and cargo) and the actual utilisation of Kai Tak before it was closed? How long was the runway extended in the 1970s? Was it named 13/31? — Instantnood 12:44, Feb 13 2005 (UTC)
Answered now... Oldie 18:18, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
When was the Kai Tak Airport renamed Hong Kong International Airport? — Instantnood July 6, 2005 14:29 (UTC)
[edit] North or northwest?
Hi, I was reading a page call Kai Tak International Airport of Hong Kong. The encyclopedia said "the airport was located north of Kowloon Bay"
This is the diagram of the geography:
__________
airport | NW N
-- ----- \ |
\ \ \ \ |
\ \ \ Kowloon Bay W ____\_|______ E
\ \ \ |
\ \ \_______________ |
\_/ |
S
I changed a word north to northwest. but u guys change it back. I thought that my imformation was pretty accurate since I have lived in Hong Kong for a long time and I am pretty good with geography. So can i ask why u change it back? Thank you very much. (Anon, via an email to the Board) - Angela 20:54, August 19, 2005 (UTC)
- Here's (the top right quadrant) an old map showing the old coastlines that I've found (compare with a recent satellite picture). The apron, passenger terminal and cargo terminal were actually built on reclaimed lands in the northern part of the bay, and the runway extends from that area towards the southeast into the bay. — Instantnood 17:10, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Requested move
This article, not sure for what reasons, has been existed under this title since it was created. Nevertheless, the airport itself has never been called "Kai Tak International Airport". It was originally known as "Kai Tak Airport", and was later renamed "Hong Kong International Airport". Despite the official name was changed, the old name remains popular, and is frequently used to differentiate from the new airport of the same name which replaced it.
I would like to propose to change the title as "Kai Tak Airport", which was one of the names that the airport has been known as. (I understand this move can be performed with the move button, but since this article has been here with this title for more than 2 years, I'm not too sure if the move would upset anybody.) — Instantnood 17:10, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
- Support. — Instantnood 17:10, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose, why bother? and "Kai Tak International Airport" was used as well, I don't know if it was an official name, nor do I know if Kai Tak Airport was an official name. As long as redirects exist, it's a pointless move, as it no longer exists anyways. SchmuckyTheCat 17:54, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
- Add any additional comments
- Moved from WP:RM as per WP:RM policy:
google "kai tak international airport" on site:hongkongairport.com comes up with a hit for the term. The official airport authority uses the term (I have no idea in what context), but it's not like this article is currently at a the wrong name. This discussion is continued at the talk page of the article, not here. SchmuckyTheCat 18:19, 5 October 2005 (UTC)- In response to user:SchmuckyTheCat's comment at WP:RM [1]: the former Hong Kong International Airport (i.e. Kai Tak Airport) has never been managed by the Airport Authority, the owner of www.hongkongairport.com. The Airport Authority was set up for the new HKIA. FYI, the one hit in the Google search you have tried is the main page of the website [2]. (If you look into the source code of www.hongkongairport.com/index.html, you would know the words Kai Tak do not even appear.) — Instantnood 18:58, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
-
- Ok, I still don't see how the current name is wrong, it seems to be KTIA or KTA, and since it was international.... Why don't you just provide a cite, a real cite by the controlling business or license or charter, or whatever, that backs up the necessity to change it. It's really not that important, so if you can provide a proper cite, nobody is going to disagree. If you can't, you're just proposing moves because you like to do so. SchmuckyTheCat 02:59, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Decision
Page moved as requested. Ryan Norton T | @ | C 20:40, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Language in Article
Some of the language in this article seems a little inappropriate for an encyclopedia entry - hijackers 'taken down'...the view of the turning aircraft being 'quite the thrill'
ahpook 15:06, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] The 13 approach
"Another challenge for the landing is the relatively short runway for large aircraft"
The article also says the runway was 11,122ft long -- that is a relatively long runway for any aircraft. By comparison, the longest runway at KLAX is 12,091ft, the longest runway at KEWR is 11,000ft and these are both major US airports that serve heavy traffic. Even if 11,000ft was short, it wouldn't be a factor for the landing distance since runway length is a more significant factor for takeoff roll distance.
"Consequently, aircraft must land accurately at the landing spot at where the runway starts or face the risk of overrunning the runway and end up in the sea.
This is not an unusual characteristic for an airport. KBOS, KSFO, KJFK, etc, all have runway configurations that are adjacent to water. It would be good to get a pilot who has flown into this airport to edit this article; it seems to be be written more by observers and lacks the technical accuracy that would be more valuable for an encyclopedia. Dbchip 01:09, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
87.17.224.154 14:13, 23 September 2006 (UTC)Paul On short final pilots perform a Visual Approach, instead of VFR. This means that they don't change the flight rules (they still remain within IFR rules, but they conduct the final approach visually.
[edit] Future plans for the site
This section describes scaling "down" from 133 hectares to 166 hectares. I'm not used to dealing with hectares, but I'm pretty sure units of measurement of area follow natural laws of mathematical increment and 166 hectares is in fact larger than 133. This would make the following mention of being further scaled down to 133 hectares sensible, except that 133 is the original number. I don't know where to find further details on the plans for airport site land reclamation, so perhaps someone with better familiarity with this project could clean this up.
[edit] Golf course
Is it still used as a golf course? - jlao 04 08:39, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
