User talk:Ju98 5
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Nariño's_House.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Nariño's_House.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact Carnildo or ask for help at Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. Thank you.
[edit] Avianca Table
I notice that you keep re-adding the words "aircrafts" and "cities" to the Avianca table when referring to its fleet and destinations, this is unecessary due to the fact the table already indicates that when citing the words "fleet" and "destinations" on the side. Adding the word "aircrafts" is also grammatically incorrect since the plural form of "aircraft" is also "aircraft" without the "s" at the end. Adding in those words is thus redudant since anyone reading the table would automatically know the airline has 49 aircraft and flies to 39 cities when reading "fleet" and "destinations" on the side of it. I hope you keep this in mind while you clean-up the article. Thanks. -- SmthManly / ManlyTalk / ManlyContribs 00:03, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Use of Preview button, image copyright
When editing articles please use the preview button to check what you edited. Do not save and check then because you'll create restore points for every single edit! Please do not upload images stolen from other sites with even stating the source! --Denniss 20:35, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
- Please stop reverting edits to Image:Avianca Boeing 747.JPG IT is not your image as it was takern from another site without even stating the source. If you continue to revert these copyvio/no license tags I'll contact an admin with a temp blocking request. Please only upload media with a free license and proper source or own media. Do not upload images stolen from other sites! --Denniss 16:15, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Avianca
You cannot make a claim of it being the first airline in its introductory paragraph when the history section clearly states the claim is disputed. Please take not of that for future rewritting. Thanks. -- SmthManly / ManlyTalk / ManlyContribs 01:25, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
- Well, other than the airline's own claim [1], and the airline's proof in historical documents and pictures, as well as the fact it is registered under IATA also (having the code OP), meaning it would have the same information as Avianca would in the registry, there is the fact the airline does exist and operates, and even had a recent crash on December 19. I have not gone into IATA itself to find their registry, but I am sure they would be listed or if not they'd be unable to operate. Either way, this claim is disputed by the airlines themselves, not by me individually. I am not out to discredit anyone or take anyone's thunder, or make up stories. If I were, I'd have removed all mention of Avianca's claim to being second instead of rewritting it to include both points of view; I'm really just trying to keep the article neutral. Hiding a claim wouldn't be neutral, and taking an airline's side is also unfair. Many people, especially Colombians, automatically dismiss the claims and wish they not be mentioned, and that is basically wrong. I know it's just a minor dispute, but it is a major subject that makes it credible enough to be included. Don't think I'm trying to do this out of some twisted personal point of view. I myself am Colombian and worked for Avianca for two years at FLL, and would wish for Avianca to be first as it claimed back in the 1970s during a marketting campaign. I am very interested in Aviation and these claims are credible, having worked at Fort Lauderdale Airport, I can tell you Chalk's is an airline that operates just like any other. If you want to dispute this further, we can do it, but I'd still prefer for there to be a neutrality to both points of view. Also, please sign your comments using ~~~~. Thank You. -- SmthManly / ManlyTalk / ManlyContribs 01:51, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
-
- Also, it would be reasonable if you would leave the article in a neutral tone until this can be sorted out. Even still, having the claim that it is the first in the americas in the introduction is unecessary. KLM does not make its claim in its introductory paragraph, it is only necessary in the history section. -- SmthManly / ManlyTalk / ManlyContribs
- What are you talking about, official information comes from official webpages all the time. In fact, most of the information about Avianca comes from its official webpage, should we not trust that??? Almost every article on a company or organization on Wikipedia has information taken from its webpage. What would a credible source be then if not from the official source itself? There is no way to confirm or deny who is the real winner of the title, I'm not trying to write "Avianca is not the 2nd airline in the world, Chalk's is", I'm trying to say "Avianca and Chalk's both claim to be the 2nd airline, who it is, is a mystery. Here are the facts from each side... now you as the reader can decide until the claim is lifted". This isn't some guy trying to make a claim, this is a whole responsible company who is not making any real claims, just reporting its historical fact of when it was founded and when it began flying. That is all... saying that their webpage is not credible is ludicrous at best!!! (I'm not angry, just a bit shocked... LOL, let's not argue, let's take this lightheartedly) -- SmthManly / ManlyTalk / ManlyContribs 02:04, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Hey!! You should use the preview button to check your edits before submitting. It saves time and doesn't put a lot of sequential edits onto the article. Also, I guess you somewhat agree with my last paragraph on the historical subject then? right? -- SmthManly / ManlyTalk / ManlyContribs 05:32, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
Hey, Great Job at writting the history section, with a bit more cleanup and several external links and notes in the article this could be a good candidate for a Featured Article! What do you think of shooting for that? -- SmthManly / ManlyTalk / ManlyContribs 18:51, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Moving articles
Hi, could you please use the move button to move articles, instead of copying the content to a new location? Thanks, RexNL 15:22, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Vipdornier.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Vipdornier.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:56, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Moving Articles
Ju98 man, you need to use the "move" button at the top of the pages if you're going to rename an article. You cannot just simply copy all the information to a new page and create a redirect because the article history remains at the redirect page and then it can become a problem for someone who wants to see the article's edit history. Just click on move, put in the new title, and give a small reason as to why you're moving it... the page, with all its information and edit history will automatically be moved and the old page will become a redirect, but remember to first check and make sure that the page you're moving it to is empty because if not the move will fail or you may end up deleting another article. If the page exists but is a redirect, you do not have to clear it because it will override redirects. Keep this in mind if you're planning on moving articles to a new name. It also affects other user's watchlist as a moved page will automatically be updated on a user's watchlist but not if you just copy and paste to a new location. Keep up the good work on Colombian aviation, but also keep these rules in mind. Feel free to contact me if you require any help, and I do speak Spanish in case you feel better communicating in that language instead. Thanks. -- SmthManly / ManlyTalk / ManlyContribs 07:17, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Minor Edits
Please do not mark an edit as "minor" if it is not a minor edit. Best, Kukini 15:47, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Vipdornier2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Vipdornier2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:27, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] License tagging for Image:Bogota coat of arms.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:Bogota coat of arms.PNG. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:05, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] National Museum of Columbia
I was going to tell you not to copy stuff from other websites, but it looks like you dont give a damn about copyright anyway. CharlotteWebb 02:59, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] avianca's fleet
Why are you changing Aviancas fleet detail. Do you have a source that have the actual airline fleet detail, or you just changing it for fun. if for sure you have a source or "link" to claim your post? ColBog
Hi, I've seen you added Tulsa International Airport to the Avianca destinations page. I checked on their website (not that I needed to as it is so obvious) and of course they don't fly there. I'm pretty sure you know this as how could you not be? Tulsa is such a small city that why would the airline of Colombia which has nothing to do with that city fly there? If by some extremly extremly unlikely chance that you are right contact me and I will revert my edit but I don't think that wil happen. If you knew this while you were editing what you did is considered vandalism. If you didn't know that they don't fly there, now you know.
Thanks, Vivaperucarajo 01:10, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] License tagging for Image:Balsa oro muisca.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Balsa oro muisca.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:04, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Aviancab767.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Aviancab767.gif. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Denniss 01:02, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] avianca
Hey you are doing a great job on aviancas article, but there is an error, for the B767-300 you put a picture from a 767-200, "By the way thats a nice image" you should put that picture in the 767-200 slot to replace the other one.
this is an image of a 767-300, is a little bit larger, I hope this will help [2]
[edit] GREAT JOB!
with a little bit of cleanup this article is absolutely a future article, thanks for the contributions, Ju98 you will really earn a contribution award really soon!! User:ColBog.
you are doing a nice job on the avianca article, keep it like that User:ColBog
[edit] Minor edits #2
Remember to mark your edits as minor only when they genuinely are (see Wikipedia:Minor edit). "The rule of thumb is that an edit of a page that is spelling corrections, formatting, and minor rearranging of text should be flagged as a 'minor edit'." -Will Beback 06:08, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Colombia's Coat of Arms.JPG listed for deletion
[edit] New Airlines in Colombia
Hey, if you know enough information about the four new airlines given authority to fly in Colombia this week, perhaps we can work together to start up articles on them. It could be something small at first based on the Avianca article but if they're going to be real certified airlines, or even just start-up airlines without concrete plans they deserve an article. What do you say? -- SmthManly / ManlyTalk / ManlyContribs 12:43, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Adittions
Hola Ju, queria saber si me puedieras pasar cualquier adiciones que querais agregrales a los articulos, como la seccion historial que acabas de ponerle al SKBO, antes de que las agreges. Te lo estoy pidiendo para poder arreglarles la autografia a sus adiciones, asi no salgan mal escritas en el articulo y se aparsecan mas profesional. Que dices? Gracias. -- SmthManly / ManlyTalk / ManlyContribs 23:32, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hola
Soy No sé qué nick poner, administrador de la wiki en español, y recientemente subí a Commons una de tus imágenes: Image:Bogota hailstorm.jpg. Me preguntaba si no tendrías una versión más grande de la imagen, ya que un colega quiere proponerla para destacado en Commons. Cualquier mensaje que quieras dejarme, puedes hacerlo en mi página de discusión. Gracias, un saludo. --No sé qué nick poner 19:33, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:George Thaddeus Lozano University.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:George Thaddeus Lozano University.PNG. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nilfanion (talk) 21:30, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:National University of Colombia.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:National University of Colombia.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 21:19, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Our Lady of the Rosary University.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Our Lady of the Rosary University.PNG. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 21:07, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
