User talk:Jorgenpfhartogs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jorgenpfhartogs
user | talk | contribs | sandbox 2 | js | css

I am currently online!
Last updated: {{{2}}}. Purge this page to check for updates.

Talk Page
Hey look, it's another talk page!

If I've left a message on your talk page, you can reply there. I'll have your page watchlisted. If you've left a message here, I'll reply on your talk page (with the entire contents of our discussion) unless your talk page says otherwise.

Contents

[edit] The old cemetery

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your new article The old cemetery appears to have been copied from here. For more information, see Wikipedia:Copyright problems. You cannot submit work to Wikipedia unless it is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License or is in the public domain. If it is, please provide substantive evidence (in English) on the article's talk page. In addition, the content you posted is written in Dutch. The English Wikipedia only accepts contributions in English. If you would like to contribute in the Dutch language, see the Dutch Wikipedia. Thanks, and happy editing. sɪzlæk [ +t, +c, +m ] 07:24, August 1, 2005 (UTC)

Jörgen, do check out how copyright works as sɪzlæk says above. Under copyright law, a translation is considered a derivative work where the copyright of the original work still applies. Tearlach 21:00, 1 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Removal of copyvio tags

Please stop removing copyvio tags. The decision is down to the admins who assess listings on the Wikipedia:Copyright problems page. If you have reason to believe there is no copyright violation, discuss it. As I said, copyright still applies after translation. Tearlach 11:18, 2 August 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for your note: see User talk:Tearlach#Copyright. Best move is to let the copyvio page admins assess it. If they agree with you, I'll happily admit I was wrong. But close translations of this sort, even with paragraphs of new material in between, do tend to be viewed as copyvios. Tearlach 09:36, 3 August 2005 (UTC)

I agree but most of them are chronological summaries about these monuments. The facts will saty the same, translate or not, so the format will always look similar to the original. However, it's up to the moderators to review this. If a rewrite has to be done required, please let me know so I can come up with another text. Jorgenpfhartogs 10:01, 3 August 2005 (UTC)

Well, there's always a way to phrase differently (drawing on multiple sources helps). These need a look at too: Loretto Abbey/[1], Yellow House Pub (Dublin)/[2] and Marlay Park/[3]. Tearlach 18:37, 3 August 2005 (UTC)

Well I did not create these sites, but I will certainly take a look at them. Jorgenpfhartogs 07:07, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] I'll get blocked

Soon I'll get blocked (you can be sure of it). --213.138.128.13 15:53, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Pubs

Hoi,

Ik zie dat je veel artikelen over pubs in Ierland aan het schrijven bent. Zou je er op willen letten om een spatie tussen de naam van de put te zetten en het gedeelte tussen haakje. Verder gebruik je te veel, te algemene categorien. Succes, --R.Koot 10:12, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

Please stop contributing the way you are now! Most of your edits seem to be copyright violations. Could you please explain this, because this most likely get you banned? --R.Koot 10:27, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
Would you please add licensing information to all the images you uploaded. If you don't they will eventualy be deleted. (I suspect that most of these images are not in the public domain nor constitute fair use, please delete them.) --R.Koot 10:55, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
It still is plagiarism. And this does not solve the problem of all the images you uploaded. Furthermore, I sugest you read the Wikipedia:Manual of style. You should try to avoid to Start Every Word In The Title With A Capital. Creating redirect from dutch words is also discouraged. And most of the article you create are most likely to get deleted because of non notability, so you might think if this is worth your time. --R.Koot 12:18, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

It is not plagiarism. I don't use the images anymore but will get new ones that are not uploaded on my site already. A lot of those images come directly from my side so if people use them somewhere else I don't complain. Concerning Capitals: The Old Orchard Pub is the name so that would be in capitals. I don't know where I redirect them from Dutch words, but I can't find them. Jorgenpfhartogs 12:24, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

Tachtigjarige Oorlog (dutch name and wrong caps). Well then you don't quite understand the concept of plagiarism. Do you claim to have the copyright on all the images you uploaded? --R.Koot 12:27, 5 August 2005 (UTC)


This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. STOP REVERTING THE COPYVIOs!

[edit] The Old Orchad Pub(Dublin)

Hey Jorgenpfhartogs, The Old Orchard Pub(Dublin) will need to be moved to The Old Orchard Pub (Dublin), but before I do that I'm just checking that it is actually called "The Old Orchad Pub" and not "Old Orchad Pub". While I'm here, I'm guessing you speak some German, and I am wondering how the letter "k" is pronounced when you say the alphabet in German. Eg, in English we say ..."jay", "kay", "ell"... --Commander Keane 12:46, August 5, 2005 (UTC)

Indeed, you're aboslutely right; it is called Orchard Pub, but since it is a pub I thought I should call it "The" Orchard since there is only one in Dublin (there is another one in Swords, Co. Dublin). I do speak German, the "k" would be pronounced as "kaa" , with a long "aa" like in car but longer. Jorgenpfhartogs 12:57, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Johan Hendrik Caspar Kern

Sure, you can send me the translations (of those Dutch articles, I presume?). My normal response would be "well, why don't you just revise Johan Hendrik Caspar Kern yourself?", but reading this talk page I guess I see why. :) You can use User talk:Quuxplusone/Johan Hendrik Caspar Kern as a scratch page if you like. --Quuxplusone 21:09, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Nice work

It's great to see you contributing in a more productive way. Here are some suggestions to help you further:

  • I did some editing to Wessem. I removed some images (see the point below) changed a standard location template. You might want to fill out some of the information in there.
  • The images you uploaded are still untagged. You can can view the images you uploaded by clicking on 'my contributions'. You should then add a tag to each images, specifying it's licence and source (see Wikipedia:Images and Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags). If the image is not under a license acceptable to Wikipedia, you can {{d}} on the page. An admin will than delete that image.
  • It's not allowed to add links to your own site. On several pages this has already been reverted by me or other users, but it would be simpler if you didn't add them.
  • After the copyright problems on the articles about Rathfarnahms pubs has been resolved, it would be great if you could rename them (from "The Eden Pub(Dublin)" to "Eden Pub (Dublin)"/"The Eden Pub (Dublin)" (depending on wether or not The is part of the official name)) and categorize them under "Rathfarnham pubs" instead of "Rahthfarnham Pubs".

Cheers and happy editing, R.Koot 15:52, 8 August 2005 (UTC)

Ok thanks, I'll start on it tomorrow. Jorgenpfhartogs 15:55, 8 August 2005 (UTC)

Linking to your own user page shouldn't be done either. (because of Avoid Self References) :) --R.Koot 16:04, 8 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:CastleRaf.jpg

needs a source Derex 03:49, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

I've noticed that Image:Ventures79.jpg, and possibly other images you've uploaded, do not have source and copyright information. They may be tagged as having {{no source}} or being of {{unknown}} copyright status. Images given those tags can be deleted 7 days later without further warning. To prevent this, provide accurate copyright tags and sources for all your images. For a list, see your upload log. If you have questions or need help, post to my talk page. Thank you for your cooperation. Superm401 | Talk 23:07, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image of Dutch dialects

Hi Jörgen,

You've made a map of Dutch dialects. I like it, but also feel that it can be improved on many points:

  1. It gives the Flemish and Brabantic dialects in Belgium the same colour, suggesting they are more closely related to each other than to the adjoining dialects in The Netherlands.
  2. It shows the dialects of Limburg north of the mich-line as essentially Limburgish. They are Brabantic or South Gueldrian.
  3. The east of Zeeuws-Vlaanderen is given as Zealandic. It is East Flemish.
  4. The Achterhoek is in fact soundly Saxon. The Lijmers is the transition zone.
  5. There is no dialect continuum between Frisian and Saxon, so more precise lines would be in order.
  6. West Flemish should have a different colour from East Flemish.
  7. You correctly let Limburgish extend into Germany. The same should be done for Brabantic and Saxon.

Perhaps when you have time you could change it? As it is, it's rather deceptive, especially on the first point :o(. --MWAK 07:43, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Images on 13th Dublin

Hi. I noticed most images on 13th Dublin don't have sources. My guess is, most of them won't stay long (i.e. someone will soon delete them), so I'd recommend you add a tag to them. Either {{gfdl}} or {{PD}} if you have taken the image youself or have permission to realease the image under those licenses, or {{fair use}} if you haven't permission, but think it would otherwise constitute fair use. Regards, Fred-Chess 23:23, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:VlagRoermond.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:VlagRoermond.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag, so its copyright status is therefore unclear. Please add a tag to let us know its copyright status. (If you created/took the picture then you can use {{gfdl}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{fairuse}}.) See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have tagged them, too. Note that any unsourced and untagged imaged will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --Michael 09:02, 1 October 2005 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:Rathfarnham yellow house.jpg

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Rathfarnham yellow house.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Supercoop 20:43, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:Buglers.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Buglers.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, ie in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{gfdl}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{fairuse}}.) See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. HI YOU NEED TO CHECK THE SOURCE OF THE IMAGES AND ASK IF THE CREATOR WILL RELEASE IT INTO THE PUBLIC DOMAIN I.E. DECLINE ALL RIGHTS TO THE IMAGE BEFORE YOU UPLOAD IT WHICH WOULD AVOID A LOT OF WORK FOR OTHER WIKIPEDIANS THANKYOU Arnie587 01:55, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:Voorstad.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Voorstad.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, ie in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{gfdl}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{fairuse}}.) See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --Nv8200p (talk) 02:53, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

Please also indicate the source and copyright status of Image:Padraig.jpg, Image:Edenpub.jpg, and all other images you've uploaded. (For pictures you made yourself, in addition to saying so, please add {{GFDL}}.) dbenbenn | talk 21:42, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Vlag2.gif has been listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Vlag2.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
--Bash 04:46, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Removal of banners.

Referring to Image:Vlag2.gif. What word in the sentence "Do not remove this notice while the question is being considered." don't you understand? --R.Koot 14:56, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:WapenLimburg.jpg has been listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:WapenLimburg.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
Orphan and no source. --Bash 22:16, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:WapenschildLimBE.jpg has been listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:WapenschildLimBE.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
Orphan and no source. --Bash 22:16, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Please don't delete IFD tags from the image pages

They are still orphans and are still fair game for deletion. --Bash 23:52, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

My fault. Didn't realize you uploaded the pictures. Please, if you upload these images again, please link them up. --Bash 23:53, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

Ok, I will , no woriies , no problems. Jorgenpfhartogs 07:49, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Unsourced images

The following images are in the {{no source}} category, and so will be deleted Really Soon Now unless you provide a source for them. Just letting you know. JesseW, the juggling janitor 06:48, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

  • Image:Burgemeester van beers.jpg
  • Image:Carrillion.jpg
  • Image:CupTeam2005.jpg
  • Image:Edenpub.jpg
  • Image:Frans Wiertz.jpg
  • Image:GemeentenLim.jpg
  • Image:GerechtArrond.jpg
  • Image:GerechtKantons.jpg
  • Image:Kerkhof 1.jpg
  • Image:Kerkhof 2.jpg
  • Image:Kerkhof 3.jpg
  • Image:Kerkhof 4.jpg
  • Image:Kerkhof cuypers.jpg
  • Image:Kerkhof handjes.jpg
  • Image:Kerkhof oudejoodse 600.jpg
  • Image:Kerkhof.jpg
  • Image:Kerkhof1 200.jpg
  • Image:Kerkhof1.jpg
  • Image:Kerkhof2 200.jpg
  • Image:Kerkhof3 200.jpg
  • Image:Kerkhof4 200.jpg
  • Image:Kerkhof5 200.jpg
  • Image:Kerkhof6 200.jpg
  • Image:Kerkhof7 200.jpg
  • Image:KiesKantons.jpg
  • Image:Kilmashogue.jpg
  • Image:Limburg-Position.JPG
  • Image:Lorabbey2.jpg
  • Image:Loretto.jpg
  • Image:Loretto2.jpg
  • Image:MijnGemeenten.jpg
  • Image:Munster Cuypers.jpg
  • Image:Munster kiosk.jpg
  • Image:Munsterkerk 200.jpg
  • Image:Munsterkerk avond 200.jpg
  • Image:Munsterkerk kiosk.jpg
  • Image:Munsterkerk tekening 200.jpg
  • Image:Munsterkerkochtendg.jpg
  • Image:Munsterplein.jpg
  • Image:Padraig.jpg

[edit] Image source/licensing for Image:Burgemeester van beers.jpg

The image you uploaded, Image:Burgemeester van beers.jpg, has no source information. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, ie in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. Unless the copyright status is provided, the image will be marked for deletion on 24 October 2005.

This message notification has been automatically sent by NotificationBot managed and run by AllyUnion. Please leave comments regarding bot operations at AllyUnion's talk page. Please direct all comments regarding licensing information at Wikipedia talk:Images for deletion. --NotificationBot 13:23, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:CupTeam2005.jpg

The source and copyright information for this image is unsatisfactory. To prevent the image from being deleted, you'll need to provide a hyperlink to the Dublin Archives, as well as a description of their licensing policy. If the contents of the archives are copyrighted, you'll need to ascertain whether or not the image is eligible for {{fairuse}}. Ingoolemo talk 19:19, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Kilmashogue.jpg has been listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Kilmashogue.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

[edit] Image:Loretto.jpg has been listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Loretto.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

[edit] VWN en WCN

Beste allemaal Al enige tijd is er een Nederlandstalig chapter in oprichting, te vinden op http://nl.wikimedia.org . Dit wordt de Vereniging Wikimedia Nederland (VWN). Je kunt je interesse om lid te worden van deze vereniging hier aangeven.

Deze vereniging gaat eind augustus/begin september een Wikimedia Conferentie in Nederland (WCN) houden, volgend op Wikimania in Boston, gedeeltelijk erop inspelend middels een aantal discussiegroepen. Om iets dergelijks te organiseren is imput erg gewenst. Dus als je wilt meehelpen, of als je interesse hebt om bij een dergelijk evenement aanwezig te zijn, geef dat dan aan op nl.wikimedia. Ik hoop daar snel je imput tegemoet te zien! Met vriendelijke groet, effeietsanders 15:41, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Gaelic Games

Hi, i have noticed that you have previously edited articles related to the subject of Gaelic Games. Several users, including my self, have start work on a WikiProject to collaborate and pool our work on the subject to create, expand and improve listings about Gaelic Games and related subjects. With your previous edits i was wondering if you would be willing to join us and help out in this project. Their is no commitment necessary, and you can assists the project as your time permits. If your interested you can check out the project at Wikipedia:WikiProject Gaelic Games, and if you have any questions about the project feel free to drop a line on the project talk page, or you can drop me a line directly. Thank you, and i look forward to your assistance. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 09:12, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Scouting Ireland edits

Hi, thanks for your contributions on Scouting in Ireland. However, the Scouting page is international so it is important that detailed information on national history is moved to the right national page. Would you mind doing that? Thanks. Zaian 13:58, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] dialects - Image:Dialects.GIF

Enlarge
Jorgen, I don't quite understand this image. What do the different shades of green mean, for instance? Also, I noticed the paint-bucket hasn't properly filled in parts of the image and it looks a bit messy (blame it on whatever imaging application you were using -- hope it wasn't MS Paint! :) Anyway, do you think it would be possible for us to work together to clean up and clarify this image? — Donama 02:47, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the explanation. Let me know if I can help out with updating the image. Cheers — Donama 13:28, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Welcome, Jorgenpfhartogs, to Wikipedia, the greatest encyclopedia on Earth! You seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics! You may wish to review the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, as well as the avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages. The Wikipedia directory is also quite useful.

By the way, an important tip: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automagically add your name and the time after your comments.

To basically understand the principles and rules governing Wikipedia, you should take a look the Five Pillars that underlie all rules here.

Hope to see you around the Wiki! And if you have any questions whatsoever, feel free to contact me on my talk page!
Bratschetalk 5 pillars 14:43, July 18, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Eoscamelbeeckf1.gif

Why was the Image:Eoscamelbeeckf1.gif deleted? I've included the rights. I've requested the right to use it from the authors of the file and got it. Shouldn't you first mark it for deletion instead of just go around deleting things? Jorgenpfhartogs 16:39, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your message. Wikipedia is a free content encyclopedia. As a result, it does not accept images that are permitted for use only here, as that permission could be withdrawn at any time and it stops others from using it. To upload an image onto Wikipedia, it must either be released under a free license (and verification of that release lodged with the Wikimedia PR Dept at permissions@wikimedia.org) or usable under the very narrow fair use policy. There are some email texts that you can use to request such a release.
Images that are licensed with permission only are eligible for speedy deletion under criterion I3, and nobody needs to mark them for deletion or wait for any time. Also, when you uploaded the image, a warning was displayed that the page was a candidate for speedy deletion, which is why you were not further informed.
By the way, Kerry will not get another all-Ireland because Cork will beat them again, despite the ridiculous back door situation which has led to this third meeting :) Stifle (talk) 17:16, 10 August 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Copyright

See Talk:Catholic_Guides_of_Ireland It is a possible copyright violation, you cant just copy and paste stuff from webpages Stevecull 14:09, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Armenian Genocide

I see from your message on Talk:Armenian Genocide that you are not aware of the Armenian atrocities that occured during this period. Not surprising. Few people from the Christian west have managed to learn the truth. Let me recommend Justin McCarthy's excellent book, The Ottoman Peoples and the End of Empire [4]. --Anthon.Eff 23:34, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Quoyle point

If you're going to write an article, don't copy and paste the entire content of another page. I noticed you added onto the article and removed the redirect. Just make sure that in the future, before you save an article and it is officially "created," that the article is complete, because there are many people who sit and patrol new pages, and when one pops up that looks like yours did, it will be quickly dealt with. I have my eye on your article. IMHO, it still should be merged with the book site, but you have time to develop it now. Lauren 23:22, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

On a lighter note, I would be happy to help you better format your talk page and your userboxes if you would like. I have been doing a lot of re-formatting of my own recently, and I am getting pretty good at it! Lauren 00:04, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tips

There are a few things you should read, first. I've noticed you've gotten a LOT of messages about copyright tags. READ the Wikipedia guidelines for copyrights, and MAKE SURE that you tag all your images accordingly. It's a tricky issue, and a lot of people dedicated a lot of time to making sure this site is run correctly. I can tell you don't have malicious intent, so just try to be more careful.

Another helpful hint is that when you're editing/creating an article, try not to save after every sentence :) Your edit history shows a long series of edits on one article at a time. If you want to see the progress of an article, you don't have to hit the "save" button; you can just hit "preview."

I'm going to go ahead and clean up your userboxes. You have quite a few! Read this article by the founder of wikipedia about userboxes, and you might want to cut down on them.

Feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you have any more questions! Lauren 00:33, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Boxes done

Alright, I finished up your boxes. You really should think about getting rid of some of them. Later I'm going to convert them into the new format, but they're organized for right now. Enjoy! Lauren 13:17, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] BP Scouts

Please see comments on the two BP Scouts talk pages. I think much of what you added is fine, but I also think it crosses the line at points. I think the POV and advertising needsd to be cut out. Let me know if you want to do it or I'll do it if you like.Rlevse 11:41, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wiki merit badge

Image:Wiki merit badge.png, I present you this wiki merit badge for dedication to Scouting, and especially for your work on Baden-Powell Scouts. Keep it up! Rlevse 21:16, 1 September 2006 (UTC)


Thanks a mill! If only they had these for on me uniform. It's weekend so I'll be editing again. Jorgenpfhartogs 15:49, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Troop2.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Troop2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 18:22, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Copyrighted images & Userboxes

I remove three copyrighted images of Buffy logo, Charmed logo and Alyson Hannigan from user boxes on your User page. Wikipedia says it is a copyright violation to use copyrighted images this way. See Wikipedia:Fair_use#Policy item #9 -Thanks Nv8200p talk 02:36, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can