User talk:Jordevi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit]
Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia, the greatest encyclopedia on Earth! You seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics!
You may wish to review the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, as well as the avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.
Here are some helpful links:
- Wikipedia:Merge, for information about merging, renaming and moving pages.
- Wikipedia directory is also quite useful.
- Meet other new users You may want to add yourself to the Wikipedia new user log.
- Assign edits to your username from before you registered.
- Be Bold!
- Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
- Play nice with others
- Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
- Tell us about you
- How to upload files and image copyright tags.
By the way, an important tip: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments.
Hope to see you around the Wiki! If you have any questions whatsoever, feel free to contact me on my talk page :)Joe I 05:41, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hola!
Hola Jordevi! Thank you for joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Uruguay. My name is Antonio, Im the originating member of the project and I am from Puerto Rico, and I dedicated WikiProject Uruguay to your beautiful country.
I wanted to ask you to visit, and maybe join also, other wikiprojects I have originated, such as Wikipedia:WikiProject Puerto Rico, Wikipedia:WikiProject Cuba and thse that Im a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Argentina and Wikipedia:WikiProject Mexico. I feel we become more powerful as we learn about our paises hermanos together.
Well, thanks for joining WikiProject Uruguay and Dios te bendiga!!
Sincerely yours, your wiki-friend, Antonio Dizzy Latino Martin
[edit] Request for edit summary
Hi. I am a bot, and I am writing to you with a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, to use edit summaries a bit more often when you contribute. The reason an edit summary is important is because it allows your fellow contributors to understand what you changed; you can think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. For your information, your current edit summary usage is 10% for major edits and 16% for minor edits. (Based on the last 115 major and 37 minor edits in the article namespace.)
This is just a suggestion, and I hope that I did not appear impolite. You do not need to reply to this message, but if you would like to give me feedback, you can do so at the feedback page. Thank you, and happy edits, Mathbot 04:31, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Yorugua
Hola! Me alegra ver que hay finalmente un usuario Uruguayo ordenando las categorias. Desgraciadamente, hay pocos articulos de Uruguay, y los que estan estan muy mal categorizados. Si necesitas algo, no dudes en contactarme. Un abrazo, Mariano(t/c) 06:29, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] License tagging for Image:Welcome.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Welcome.png. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:18, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Greetings
Hi, I'm Gustavo Góngora and I'm proud to say I'm Uruguayan. I want to join the wikipedia project and thereso I included myself in the list. Let's keep in touch and work together. Kind regards, your compatriota, --Gustavo86 17:08, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Report of Special:Contributions/87.81.136.43 at WP:AIV and edit summaries
With respect to your report of User:87.81.136.43 at WP:AIV and the edits with which you disagree (and your subsequent reversions), please remember to assume good faith. This user's edits are "good faith" edits at this point. Please see Wikipedia:Vandalism for definitions of vandalism on Wikipedia -- content disputes are not the same as vandalism. Edit summaries such as "reverting vandalism once more" will only aggravate the situation. Thanks. -- Renesis (talk) 05:10, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- Oops... I made a mistake. I confused you with User:Jogurney who made the above-mentioned report. However, since you and User:Jogurney are both involved in the reverts of this user's edits, I'd still advise you to be aware of assuming good faith in edit summaries! Thanks :) -- Renesis (talk) 05:38, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- Hello, I have also been trying to revert the edits on the Liverpool FC (Montevideo) page, and I reported the user who was making them to the admins for vandalism. They have suggested that we ask the other user to explain his edits on the Talk page Talk:Liverpool FC (Montevideo). I have asked him to do this so hopefully we can get his agreement that his edits are inappropriate. Best regards. Jogurney 15:38, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- Well, I do consider those edits to be vandalism, as there's evidence to disprove at least most of what he's writing: [this site] mentions the current status of the club, as far as who the coach is at least; while this shows there is no way a person called "Walter Pele" could possibly be a relative of the football player (since Pele is just a nickname).Jordevi 21:05, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- I agree with you. Please join the discussion on the Talk page Talk:Liverpool FC (Montevideo). Thank you. Jogurney 19:54, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- Well, I do consider those edits to be vandalism, as there's evidence to disprove at least most of what he's writing: [this site] mentions the current status of the club, as far as who the coach is at least; while this shows there is no way a person called "Walter Pele" could possibly be a relative of the football player (since Pele is just a nickname).Jordevi 21:05, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- Hello, I have also been trying to revert the edits on the Liverpool FC (Montevideo) page, and I reported the user who was making them to the admins for vandalism. They have suggested that we ask the other user to explain his edits on the Talk page Talk:Liverpool FC (Montevideo). I have asked him to do this so hopefully we can get his agreement that his edits are inappropriate. Best regards. Jogurney 15:38, 29 November 2006 (UTC)