Talk:Jonathan Downes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jonathan Downes article.

[edit] Image deletion

The photograph. It was deleted earlier today, but I have reposted. I am both the photographer and the copyright holder, and there is no reason why it should be deleted. I am sure that it was only done so in the bestspirit possible, and I have no intention of starting an argument. I hope this is OK

BLOB
The thing is that you do have to say so and clarify the copyright situation when you add a picture. Then again the deletion of them does seem to have been rather swift as you haven't had a alot of time to address the situation (you only got an automated message about it yesterday). If you upload your pictures again (and I think you should) make sure you add on the right tags. See the advice here but if you are unsure I'm sure what to do I'm sure one of the deleters of your image would b happy to help you avoid the same thing happening again. (Emperor 05:46, 19 November 2006 (UTC))


I DID say so, and the bloody thing has been deleted for the second time, even though I captioned it "from the collection of Jon Downes used by permission". What do I do now? Lazarus 14:23, 19 November 2006

Looking through the notice on your Jon Downes photo (it is up for speedy deletion) it appears they don't make it easy for people to add their own pictures [1] [2] [3] and, ironically, you have to jump through a lot more hoops than if you were using someone else's image from a commercial source. Your best bet appears to be uploading it at Wikimedia and/or making it freely available under a broad license like GFDL (I've used GFDL on the photos I've uploaded). Hope that helps. (Emperor 15:18, 19 November 2006 (UTC))

Thanks mate.... It is bloody stupid tho (User:Lazarusx 19:12, 19 November 2006 (UTC))

Yes I'd forgotten how tricky it all was. The problem is that the content of Wikipedia is licensed so it can be spread to other sites and shared but if an image is uploaded on the understanding that it can only be used here on Wikipedia it causes real problems with the distribution and keeping licensing consistent. (Emperor 19:26, 19 November 2006 (UTC))

well i think it is ok now. I just hope i don't have the problems there were easrilier on this article when someone insisted on rewriting the page to have me married to someone I had never heard of (User:Lazarusx 22:55, 19 November 2006 (UTC))

That kind of thing stopped happening to me when I gave up drinking in Vegas ;) (Emperor 22:59, 19 November 2006 (UTC))