User talk:JohnJohnJohnJohn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Contents

[edit] Polton

Polton is a prinicipality in Central Scotland. Polton resides between the governmental borders of Polmont and Brightons - two small villages in Falkirk Council.

[edit] Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, JohnJohnJohnJohn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  —Whouk (talk) 15:45, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Wee Flag of Polmont.jpg

Please write in the summary what the picture depicts. Thanks. feydey 23:52, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism to Kim Jong-il

Regarding this edit;

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thank you. OhNoitsJamieTalk 19:57, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Logo she.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo she.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:10, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:MalkyNicol.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:MalkyNicol.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:06, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Polmont FC Crest.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Polmont FC Crest.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 17:12, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reasons:

Autoblock of 195.188.152.16 lifted.

Request handled by:  Netsnipe  ►  02:53, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:MalkyNicol.gif

You say this image has been allowed to be used by the site it came from. Could you provide proof? Thanks. └ OzLawyer / talk ┐ 14:49, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Use of the image was provided over email. How would you like verification of this?

Supply me with the address of the person so I may contact them. I suspect you haven't actually gotten such permission, since a previous upload of this image has already been deleted. I also note you've uploaded at least four completely different images that are supposed to be the flag of Polmont (clearly, they can't all be the flag—and probably none of them are, I'd bet). └ OzLawyer / talk ┐ 23:52, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Firstly, the original time the image was deleted, it was deleted immediately after being uploaded, with next to no time for me to react. Naivety on my part, perhaps. The email address in question was simply info@falkirk.gov.uk. I can tell this will seemingly never please some people, unfortunately, so I'll remove it from the page for atleast the time being. Maybe if you'd wait a little longer for a response then things would be resolved a little more smoothly. Oh and regarding the flags, naivety on my part with unsuccessful bordering, I'm afraid. I'll list the required images for deletion, however. Thank you.

You mean Image:Flag of DPRP.png is not a silly made up flag based on the flag of the DPRK? Come on, Johnx4! └ OzLawyer / talk ┐ 00:17, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Don't bother listing them, just let me know which ones are not the "real" flag. If the blue top and white bottom you're displaying on your userpage is the flag, then might I delete the purple/white one, the purple/white/purple ones, and the one that looks like the DPRK's flag? └ OzLawyer / talk ┐ 00:24, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Template:PLTf

Template:PLTf is up for deletion; see it here. └ OzLawyer / talk ┐ 00:17, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Oh goodmorning Mr Osgoode. The "real" one as you would call it is dprpflag.JPG. The rest, including the blue and white thing with the red star on it can go. Thank you.

Could you show me evidence that this one is the real one? I don't mean to hassle you, but the fact that you uploaded several completely different flags as the flag of Polmont kind of casts suspicion on this one as well. As for a bordered flag, which one would you like to keep? In addition, is the flag of Polton that you uploaded correct? └ OzLawyer / talk ┐ 13:48, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

It's no problem. Apart from real-life 'documents' I have with it, there seems to be no citation on the internet. This is the same for the flag of Aberdeen etc. There must be something somewhere, though. Oh and Polton can go.


Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Fraslet 17:23, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Future

Hi John, just happened to come across your edit history. Frankly, Wikipedia is not the place to play silly buggers and amuse yourself while sitting bored in front of your computer. Some of your edits and image uploads demonstrate that your account is being used to make misleading, useless and disruptive edits. A few of your edits do seem to be constructive and well intentioned, and you should continue to head in this direction. You've already been warned about your conduct and further disruptive edits could well lead to a block. Happy editing, Deizio talk 14:28, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Hello. Not all of the edits were made directly by me, unfortunately this is what you get when you leave yourself signed in permenantly with other more eccentric people in the same area. I don't appreciate being called a silly bugger either. Bye.

Sorry if my turn of phrase offended you. Your account is your responsibility and if you allow others to edit with it then it will come back to you. I recommend signing out from shared computers and protecting your log in details as you would with an email or online banking account. Take it easy, Deizio talk 15:06, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../j/o/h/User_talk%7EJohnJohnJohnJohn_09c8.html"