Talk:John Stewart Bell
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belfast, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the City of Belfast, Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.If you are a member of the project, please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. | ||
|
Article Grading: WikiProject Belfast tasks:
|
|||
I have added a little to the page (re the loopholes in the Bell tests) and given a couple of refs and a link to a biography. This does not pretend to be a full coverage of the subject. Caroline Thompson 09:52, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)
It should be "superluminal" instead of supraluminal.
[edit] According to whom did Bell hope that QM would be falsified?
"John Bell [..] had hoped that [..] experiments would eventually falsify quantum mechanics." - From reading his book, I find no such thought. He seemed to believe strongly in QM. Thus, what is the above claim based on? Harald88 18:25, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- Thus I now park the doubtful phrase here:
, and that experiments would eventually falsify quantum mechanics
Harald88 14:03, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] "EPR and Bell theorem"?
The article now asks: "perhaps one can instead regard EPR and Bell's theorem as a success?"
However, it is generally held that Bell's theorem disproved the EPR claim about specific (from the start determining) hidden variables, and Bell agreed with that. Thus that sentence needs rephrasing.
Harald88 20:14, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
this needs to be properly formatted
and why does it read like personal notes? (exclamations etc)
