Talk:John II of Jerusalem

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In my opinion, this shouold be moved to John I of Cyprus. His title of Jerusalem was purely nominal, his father had lost those small lands, and only his next brother regained them. And, had he ruled Acre, still Cyprus would have been his more important kingdom. However, he ruled in Cyprus only. 62.78.125.186 08:39, 27 May 2005 (UTC)