User talk:Joerg Kurt Wegner
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
on Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit
|
Messages
Please add new discussions by clicking here. |
[edit] Welcome
I was once a user of JOELib ... ! Glad to see you here... the cheminformatics pages are waiting for you. best wishes Shyamal 03:24, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] I am fine
Thanks Joerg, I am moderately OK on the process of editing, less on the style and sometimes unclear as to what the accepted policies are. I have created Molecular graphics and Molecular model as I have spent many years in these areas and want to make sure that the history does not get lost. The main problem are copyrighted images. Peter
[edit] JOELib-Matlab question
Hi Joerge ... it is really nice to meet somebody like you who is interested in comp chem .. please i wanna register in joelib wiki ..but only login page appears without the registration page ... can u help me ?
and can I bother you with JOELib question ... I have just added the libraries to javaclasspath in matlab , but when i try showmolecules command : i get this error message :
Undefined variable "joelib" or class "joelib.io.SimpleReader". Error in ==> showmolecules at 39 reader=joelib.io.SimpleReader(inStream,inType);
before that there were a proplem in the Inholder class I have added joelib.jar and log4j.jar to javaclasspath
sorry If my questions bother u and answer me plz if u r totally free --Chaos 10:42, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
- Please contact for all JOELib questions the mailing lists:
- I think Wikipedia should not be used in this way. But it look's like a 'simple' classpath problem, which can be sometimes really tricky. And registration can be only granted by an administrator, since we had some SPAM issues. Analogue to the OpenBabel-Wiki only granted users can edit. If you really want to contribute, then I can give you access. JKW 16:24, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi joerge .. yes I found the links of mailinglists after i send the message to you here .. sorry for that .. about the registration .. yes I like to get an access and I will try my best to help u organizing this wiki .. Best Regads --Chaos 08:59, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
- Please try to create an account and contact me via email, e.g. under wegner@users.sf.net and let me know, if you are able to create an account. JKW 17:37, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Joerg Kurt Wegner! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. - Glen TC (Stollery) 00:57, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] NCE vs NME
I noticed that you moved NCE to NME. I've heard both terms used, but in my experience is that NCE is much more common and NME. I work for a pharmaceutical company that spans both the United States and Europe and it seems consistent on both sides of the Atlantic. Google turns up more hits for "new chemical entity" than "new molecular entity" too (but I'm not sure how much that means.) It doesn't matter too much to me which title the article ends up with, but I figure it's best to find out which is more common and put it there. Let me know what you think. --Ed (Edgar181) 20:48, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- I am pro, in fact I don't care which one is the main entry as long both can be find via a redirect. And you are right, new chemical entity has compared to new molecular entity almost twice the number of Google hits. BTW, nice idea with the medicinal chemistry template. JKW 20:53, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Offending edit summary
I have fulfilled your request. You may need to refresh your page to see the new page history. -- Francs2000 22:51, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Prezista
Most drug articles use the actual drug name (Aciclovir, Sildenafil citrate, etc.) for the article title unless there is a clear precedent of genericization. Would you object to moving the prezista information over to darunavir? ˉˉanetode╞┬╡ 11:20, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for this information. Not at all, go ahead! JKW 11:48, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] AfD
Hey - I thought I'd leave you a note that I wasn't trying to look down on your publications in my AfD commentary. Actually, the solubility and partition coefficient prediction was pretty interesting. I was just envisioning a world where everyone who published some papers in specialized journals got to have Wikipedia articles, which would be a bad thing. Opabinia regalis 06:22, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] SLN?
Not sure how to help What did you need me to do exactly? -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 03:30, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- As I recall I made that redirect based on some Ethnologue code. I'm really not sure. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 13:43, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Munich
I noticed you're a good German speaker. I'm wondering if you could help out at WikiProject Munich. Maybe you could help out with the project's Translation page. If you're interested, you can sign up here. Kingjeff 04:05, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry, not at the moment, I am burried under work. Maybe on a long term. Anyway, thanks for asking. JKW 20:23, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Concordia Newsletter
Concordia is currently trying to relaunch. I, and all the members of the ex-council, wish to welcome new members to the group. We are a group who aim to promote remaining civil, in an environment where messages can easily be interpretated wrongly.
[edit] Help out now!
- Try and help people remain civil! Talk to them, and help them in any way possible. Do not be afraid to use the talk page.
- Give people the Civility Barnstar.
- Make and spread some Wikitokens so people know there are people to help if they want assistance.
- Add banners or logos to your userpage to show your support.
- Suggest some ideas! Add 'em to the talk page.
We are a community, so can only work though community contributions and support. It's the helping that counts.
[edit] Decision Making
The council expired one month ago, but due to the current position of the group the current council will remain until the position of the group can be assessed, and whether it would be sensible to keep Concordia going. For most decisions, however, it will be decided by all who choose to partake in discussions. I am trying to relaunch because of the vast amounts of new members we have received, demonstrating that the aims are supported.
If you wish to opt of of further talk-page communications, just let us know here.
- Ian¹³/t 20:29, 13 December 2006 (UTC). Kindly delivered by MiszaBot.