User talk:Jfiling
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Yo jf, whazzup. I added some stuff to your Jabbor Gibson page. Fellow H&Rer Miraculouschaos 05:00, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Regarding the article Mean Croboys
If you wish to nominate an article for deletion, you should follow the guidelines at WP:AFD. Bjelleklang - talk 00:54, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
The article had already been nominated for speedy deletion, and in fact has been deleted. Thank you for your input, though. Jfiling 02:05, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
- I know, the user that created it was a sockpuppet of a known vandal, which was discovered at the same time. Bjelleklang - talk 02:08, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
- I see now. I've just graduated from newbie status, I guess, so I was not aware of that fact. Jfiling 02:10, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Salford Jets
The article claims that Mike Sweeney is with Piccadilly Radio, so the first thing I did was to see if we had an article on that, and we do. Since he's a DJ, that gives him some claim of notability. Next, it states they had a 1980 hit, so there's a second claim of notability. {{nn-band}} was really meant for articles like (to give a really obvious example), "XXX is a rock music band with four people. They've played some high school gigs and are getting ready to release a demo album." Basically, CSD A7 (nn-band, nn-club, nn-bio) can only be applied when there is no assertion of significance/importance at all or the assertion is so ridiculous that it can't possibly be true ("Joe Schmoe is king of the USA"). What differs among administrators is what qualifies as an "assertion," although most of us set the bar pretty low. The intention of speedy deletion is really to eliminate discussion on articles that have a snowball's chance in hell of surviving AfD so that we all save our time and energy by not dealing with 100% loser articles. So you were pretty close with your application of it. A7 just got expanded to include groups of people recently so we're still testing the waters and figuring out where exactly the line is. The more conservative route is to go to AfD whenever in doubt; if the article is speediable, it will be figured out soon enough (and you'll also get a good idea of what qualifies as speedy and what doesn't). If you're doing new page patrol, you might consider looking at User:Jnothman/afd_helper to make AfD nominations easier. Regards, howcheng {chat} 08:00, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you for the good advice. I'll follow your link, and consider this a good learning experience. Jfiling 08:06, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] V7ndotcom Elursrebmem Deletion
Hi, I noticed you voted to on the abovementioned article. Initialy I wanted to keep it, but when I compared it to Nigritude ultramarine and Seraphim proudleduck it seems obvious that all theese articles are repating the same info:
- It's a search contest
- It has begin/end dates
- It has a prize
- It uses a unique phrase that is not used before
I'd like to urge you to change your vote to Redirect to SEO Contest where I have created already made a copy of the article. This way they dont have "their own article" but they are mentioned in the encyclopedia. Seems like a compromise to me. Right now w/ all the Delete, Keep, And Redirect votes it will be hard to reach a compromise.This user has left wikipedia 22:15, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit]
[edit] I've instructed wiki that you are vandalizing the KM site
and I've requested that they ban you from the site.
[edit] wikipedia is now aware of your actions and are advising me on how
to proceed to deal with your violations of user code and harrassment of posters to the KM entry
-
- Um, who are you? Jfiling 22:42, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] How did I Vandalilse the KASHMIR page
By adding a link to an active blog on Kashmir by a Kashmiri is that Vandalising and I have never ever been to any terrorism in pakistan link , and here Wiki is telling me I vandalised that page????
This is utter nonsense, I am an established wriiter in Kashmir and a link to my Blog is vandalising.
Can you make me understand how you, a non-kashmiri, is to decide what is right and what is wrong. How are you to decide the authenticity of any person???
203.135.21.45 06:13, 11 February 2006 (UTC)Kashmir
I am not sure whre I should be reponding to your response. But here it goes:
I added the link in external links only in pages of Kashmir, Srinagar and Kashmir Conflict. I have seen the same sites being repeated over and over again on all pages of Kashmir which represent the minority view. Why is that not wrong. Is it just becasue they have well organsied websites? Is now a well-organsied website the criteria for un-biasness! Further I have not beeen Vandalising any page at all.
All I did was add a couple of links, which thanfully have been removed, becasue as far as the issue of Kashmir is concerned wikipedia's information is biased and based on fiction. People who wrote that did well and good. But, such biased information came under no fire! An unbiased link is, ofcourse, spam.
Good day sir.
203.135.21.45 18:05, 11 February 2006 (UTC)Kashmir
I have added the links of muslim and pro movement newspaper greater kashmir and if you remove them i shall be assured of your baisness and soft-corner for the non-muslimns of kashmir whose links appear on each and evry topic of kashmir, however unrelated. and why isnt that spam.
203.135.21.45 20:23, 11 February 2006 (UTC)kashmir
[edit] thanks
I am sorry for being rude. I guess I should register, better way to help in this then. So, if I add the links to the newspaper greater kashmir on most pages related to kashmir (as if the case with www.ikashmir.com or www.kashmir-information.com or other minority community sites, who even add subdomains like www.ikashmir.com/abc under different headings) it won't be considered spam and will be allowed to stay. If you might have observed I deleted the link to my blog from all pages, almost.
203.135.21.45 06:31, 12 February 2006 (UTC)kashmir
Kashmir Observers credibilty is unquestionable.. All kashmiris know that and no one can misled us any more... having resources and painting news in color may make one big newspaper but never the best..
[edit] HELP
[Kashmir Observers] credibilty is unquestionable.. All kashmiris know that and no one can misled us any more... having resources and painting news in color may make one big newspaper but never the best..
