User talk:JeffBurdges
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
April Fools template code: :<div class="boilerplate" id="AprilFools">''April Fools! The [[{{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}/NotAprilFools|original article]] will be back tomorrow.''</div>
Template:AprilFools
Contents |
[edit] Re: Template:AprilFools
You can create a user sub-page right now or after the deletion discussion is closed. You have the code so it's your choice when you want to userfy it.--May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 06:54, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Technical
Perhaps these are the droids you are looking for: Wikipedia talk:Proposed policy on userboxes#Technical Solution.--God Ω War 21:30, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Invitation
Hi, I notice that no one has bothered to slap a {{welcome}} template on your page yet, and you've been here too long for me to do it. Anyway, you might be interested in the conversations that take place on the talk page to Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics. linas 02:51, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Compass and straightedge
Please comment. John Reid 16:28, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Apology for false editorial commentary
Greetings, I've apologized on the JP-MC talk page but I also wanted to apologize on your talk page. You may want to respond on the Jyllands-Posten_Muhammad_cartoons_controversy talk page. Netscott 22:32, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- oka,y thanks, I made a comment, doesn't seem much need to change the article after all. I didn't realize it had a seperate overview section after the intro. JeffBurdges 11:43, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] NatSel etc
The first step is to get Marcos in check, after that, I will start dealing with several of his articles (except the NatSel article, which seems to be highjacked by a bunch of darwin lovers KimvdLinde 23:46, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you
Oule, Ave, and Hello. I would like to thank you for voting to keep the Aleksandra Wasowicz article. I really appreciate it. Don't worry about not being able to access the article. Eventually, further research will help provide the information necessary in expanding and refining the contents of the article. Again, thanks. - Deucalionite Deucalionite 16:09, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fred Carama
Please note that you made a vote on this article's AfD based on a bad understanding of the article. Carama is not a faculty member at Julliard. He attended that school. Not all students of the school are notable, that would be a rediculous assertion.--Strothra 09:28, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
- Woops! Never mind. I'll abstain. Thanks, JeffBurdges 10:13, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
I have emailed you about something that others have been preventing people from telling you. If you do not receive it, please respond on your talk page. Dagedzil 08:54, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Please help clarify this edit of yours
This edit of yours is part of the instigation of the discussion at talk:42 (number). Can you help clarify? Note that the statement in the article is still there, but commented out. Michael Hardy 15:00, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your post about Orhan Pamuk
You know I don't care if some people try to hijack a Nobel for Turkish literatue for their own political agendas. That's their shallowness frankly. I don't get offended at all, I am over all that :)))))) Funny that u didn't put a similar post (that you put on the armenian genocide talk page) about Pamuk wikinews on the talk page of the Featured Article Turkish literature.. No agendas there, right?? :)))))) Whatever dude, I am the one that had one of his fellow city-dwellers win a Nobel prize, not u :)))) cheers!!Baristarim 02:25, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not going to take this too seriously, as you don't seem to have written anything about him in the wikinews article yourself. JeffBurdges 13:14, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- No I didn't because I was not on Wiki when he won the Nobel Prize, so there was not much I could contribute among all those people who kept on modifying Pamuk related articles every three minutes even twelve hours after.. I have contributed to wiki and started article, if that's what u r trying to imply. But u still haven't answered to me why u didn' put a similar post on the Turkish literature article (i mean, logically, at least u should have put a post there, right??), but you only put one on Armenian genocide.. That's agenda pushing and/or bad faith my friend, that's all I am saying whether u take it seriously or not.. regards Baristarim 23:45, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
Whatever, you guys start calling each other names at the drop of a hat. I don't care, not my fight.
fyi, linking the Pamuk comment was only an after thought. I really wanted comments about the French law since we had a obviously POV article about it. I just happened to remember that Pamuk's article was heading down the road to abandonment & deletion. Wkinews covers the science prises, but literature will always be the first to be forgotten.
JeffBurdges 12:39, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Cat Stevens
I think the way it now reads - with your introductory phrase about his never retracting the statements, but with his complete quote, is the best way to proceed. This is a touchy area, obviously, and I think we ought not to be characterizing or editing what is said - let the words speak for themselves. I don't think we can worry about - or predict - whether or not readers will read an entire quote - and the quote isn't so long anyway. You don't know, and I don't know, what was in his mind at any point in this affair - so let's not try to guess. Tvoz 04:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
