User talk:Jcam
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Thanx to Sam Spade for welcoming me to Wikipedia.
Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.
[edit] Hi there
Hi J,
Good to see an enthusiastic new editor, but if you blank out a page for longer than a couple of minutes, someone will likely revert you thinking you're a vandal. If you're trying to rewrite sections of an article, best to do it at your sandbox (make one by adding /sandbox to the URL when you are at your userpage, or use this link! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jcam/sandbox), or offline until you are ready to upload the finished article.
If any of your large edits are likely to be controversial with other users, it might be an idea to talk it over on the talk page before making major changes.
In the meantime, have lots of fun around here! PaulHammond 00:49, May 27, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] High school article
Sure! Take anything you want. Thanks for the feedback! Mike H 23:53, May 29, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Miami Tornado
Sorry, I didn't know that. When I wrote the article, I forgot all about the tornadoes that can be spawned from tropical cyclones, as well as from the pop-up thunderstorms Florida gets.
BigT27 02:44, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Change for Wikipedians from Florida
The list Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Florida has been replaced by Category:Wikipedians in Florida. Your name has been removed from the list. If you would like to remain listed as a Wikipedian from Florida, please add [[Category:Wikipedians in Florida]] to your User page. thanks!
Dalbury(Talk) 16:39, 29 December 2005 (UTC), a member of WikiProject Florida, a new project to improve articles about the state -- please join us and help!
[edit] Thanks for your support
Thank you for supporting me in my request for adminship! It ended with a tally of 39/5/4, and I am now an admin. I'm glad to have earned the trust of the community, and I will make use of it responsibly. Of course, you can let me know of any comments or concerns you have.
With a million articles in front of me, I'd better get mopping.
rspeer / ɹəədsɹ 05:11, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you!
Thank you! Hi Jcam, thank you for your support in my Rfa! It passed with a final tally of 86/0/0. If you need help or just want to talk let me know! Again, thank you! – Dakota ~ ° 21:51, 3 March 2006 (UTC) |
[edit] My RfA
Thank you for your support during my RfA! It has decided to postpone making me an administrator based upon recent consensus (or lack thereof). Thanks for the kind remarks and I hope to continue to see you arount the project. Cheers, ZsinjTalk 08:31, 4 March 2006 (UTC) |
[edit] The U-gouge
Yes, we're still out here. We're the annoying customers who demand that their sandwich bread be cut like it used to be, using the "U-gouge". This was, and for some still is, an ongoing source of frustration. The most notorious of us U-gouge hardliners is probably Steve, whose rant regarding this spread across the internet like wildfire back in 2001. He was even interviewed on radio and tv regarding this. Anyhow, I think that a section regarding this debate would be most helpful. --Dragon695 22:37, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Sweetwater, Florida's history
Russian circus midgets? [1] --☆TBC☆ (aka Tree Biting Conspiracy) 18:40, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Pluto
You should know better. -- Netsnipe (Talk) 20:05, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
- Just a fun edit which I knew would be quickly reverted. I've seen some of your edits... they're not ALL ones I would brag about. Jcam 20:10, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Actually, I'd like to hear about the ones I shouldn't be bragging about (if I were the type who was self-centered enough to be bragging about editing Wikipedia in the first place) — I'm always seeking feedback on how to improve myself. -- Netsnipe (Talk) 20:17, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] RfA Thanks
Thank you very much for participating in my RFA, which closed successfully today with a result of (50/3/0). If you have any further questions or suggestions, feel free to write me. I hope I will live up to your trust. Michael 01:35, 18 September 2006 (UTC) |
[edit] RfA thanks
Hey Jcam, thank you for supporting my recent RfA. It finished with an amazing final tally of 160/4/1. I really appreciate your support. Cheers, Sarah Ewart (Talk) 11:20, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you!
I had a few moments of "Oh god what have I done?" but I think it'll be okay. If it fails, I'll learn from it and try again in six months. -- Merope Talk 01:50, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Welcome to Esperanza!
Welcome, Jcam, to Esperanza! As you might know, all the Esperanzians share one important goal: the success of this encyclopedia. Within that, we then attempt to strengthen the community bonds, and be the "approachable" side of the project. All of our ideals are held in the Charter, the governing document of the association.
Now that you are a member you should read the guide to what to do now or you may be interested in some of our programs. A quite important program is Stressbusters, which seeks to support editors who have encountered any stress from their Wikipedia events, and are seeking to leave the project. So far, Esperanza can be credited with the support and retention of several users. We will send you newsletters to keep you up to date. Also, we have a calendar of special events, member birthdays, and other holidays that you can add to and follow.
In addition to these projects, several more missions of Esperanza are in development, and are currently being created at Esperanza/Proposals.
If you have any other questions, concerns, comments, or general ideas, Esperanzian or otherwise, know that you can always contact Natalya by email or talk page. Consider introducing yourself at the Esperanza talk page! Alternatively, you could communicate with fellow users via our IRC channel, #wikipedia-esperanza (which is also good for a fun chat or two :). If you're new to IRC, you may find help at an IRC tutorial. I thank you for joining Esperanza, and look forward to working with you in making Wikipedia a better place to work!
[edit] CFB Welcome
Hi, and welcome to the College football Wikiproject! We are a group of editors who love college football and work to improve Wikipedia's coverage of this sport.
There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:
- Starting some new articles? Please add {{WikiProject College football}} to the talk page and list your new article in the new articles section.
- Looking for somewhere to help? Please see our article to do list or project to do list
If you have any ideas you would like to share or if there is any way your fellow college football fans can help you, please feel free to ask on the project talk page.
--MECU≈talk 12:28, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Interested in joining the Wikipedia:WikiProject American football?
I noticed that you are involved in the NFL and college football wikiprojects. I started a new project at: Wikipedia:WikiProject American football to help clean up the non-NFL football articles (mostly football strategy type articles). Please consider joining this project and helping out where possible.
[edit] If you don't mind me asking....
Exactly what are the unknowns? The code's there in plain sight, anyone can take a look? I'm getting really confused at this now -- Tawker 17:57, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- ??????? Checked the User's contributions and found that user TawkerbotTorA falls way short of my criteria for supporting. I encourage user TawkerbotTorA to not get discouraged- many Rfa's fail the first time around. Will support after several months of good editing and interaction with other users. Jcam 17:50, 5 October 2006 (UTC) - what's that susposed to mean - this isn't exactly a standard RfA. If you want contribs, Special:Contributions/Tawker - there's lots there (I think I'm in the top 500 editors by editcountis now) :) -- Tawker 18:18, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- Wrong template I think :) -- Tawker 18:22, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- Funny, I don't remember this Rfa being about the user named Takwer, but the one named TawkerbotTorA. If TawkerbotTorA him/herself has any problems with my comments, I highly encourage him/her to contact me. Jcam 18:28, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- It's my bot account. As a rule I don't edit as bots :) -- Tawker 18:30, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- As a rule, I only vote for Homo Sapiens as administrators. Sorry if that makes me a bigot. Jcam 18:32, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- No, it doesn't make you a bigot, though your current vote likely will confuse the hell out of a lot of users. Heh, a script written by a Homo Sapien I guess is still kind of Homo Sapien. On the other hand, if you don't vote on non Homo Sapien administrators, shall I make a note of this diff and strike your vote? :) -- Tawker 18:34, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- As a rule, I only vote for Homo Sapiens as administrators. Sorry if that makes me a bigot. Jcam 18:32, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
-
Dammit, Tawker. You need to give me time to respond to your questions, I keep on getting edit conflicts trying to answer you... As for "striking my vote", sure if you want to set this precedence go ahead and strike my vote. Obviously, as mentioned in the nomination, Jimbo wanted to have this put to a vote... surely part of the reason was because many people(myself included) are hesitant about a bot administrator. Jcam 18:43, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- Well, to be honest, most people don't understand the code, but it doesn't matter. How many people review the FireFox code yet trust it. They know what it's going to do and if they cared to review it, it's there. Nobody's reviewed the Microsoft code yet we all use it. I wanted to ensure that you weren't voting on something you were not intended to, hence the comment. In short, treating a script / bot (it really is a script) as a human is just odd. -- Tawker 20:44, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- If your reason for continuing this conversation is to persuade me differently, then I suppose it is pretty pointless and should end here. Jcam 21:56, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- No, I'm just pointing out that any 'crat will take the current context of your vote and disregard it as it makes no sense whatsoever with relationship to the bot. I think you saw Cowman109's message, that's pretty much how the 'crats would take your vote. You might want to add a little logic behind it :) -- Tawker 03:36, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- I find it insulting that you question the validity of my vote. I have made my reasoning abundantly clear here and on the Rfa page(as well as my user page which you obviously have failed to look at). I also made it clear in my previous post that I consider this discussion pointless and request that unless you wish to discuss something else, refrain from continuing this discussion on my talk page. Your continued discussion is starting to border on badgering me simply because I disagree with you on an Rfa, and should you continue this discussion, I will seek alternative ways of ending it. Jcam 08:08, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- No, I'm just pointing out that any 'crat will take the current context of your vote and disregard it as it makes no sense whatsoever with relationship to the bot. I think you saw Cowman109's message, that's pretty much how the 'crats would take your vote. You might want to add a little logic behind it :) -- Tawker 03:36, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- If your reason for continuing this conversation is to persuade me differently, then I suppose it is pretty pointless and should end here. Jcam 21:56, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- Well, to be honest, most people don't understand the code, but it doesn't matter. How many people review the FireFox code yet trust it. They know what it's going to do and if they cared to review it, it's there. Nobody's reviewed the Microsoft code yet we all use it. I wanted to ensure that you weren't voting on something you were not intended to, hence the comment. In short, treating a script / bot (it really is a script) as a human is just odd. -- Tawker 20:44, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Uh, what?
You opposed the RFA for TawkerbotTorA for not using enough edit summaries. I'm assuming that you simply looked at the wrong RFA, but this is an RFA request for a bot account - not a human, to solely block the hundreds of Tor open proxies that are out there - edit summaries are kinda irrelevant. Cowman109Talk 19:23, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] RfA thanks
Thank you for participating in my RfA, which finished with a tally of 66/11/5. I learned quite a bit during the process, and I expect to be learning a lot more in the days ahead. I will be taking things slowly (and doing a lot of re-reading), but I hope you will let me know if there is anything I can do to improve in my new capacity. -- Merope Talk 12:49, 6 October 2006 (UTC) |
[edit] Thanks
Hey, Jcam, I just wanted to say thanks for using my Pro-Life userbox! It's always nice to see another Christian out there! -- P.B. Pilhet (Talk to me here) 18:52, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vahid Tarokh
Hi Jcam. I've written a comment at this AfD; can I ask to you revisit and read that? Thanks, Splash - tk 21:15, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- Hey, that's a relief. It's always good to know that AfD can work when it needs to. Yeah. Adminbots. I've never seen a persuasive case made...technological solutions are tempting but not always thought through in their full impact. -Splash - tk 00:53, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] RfA thanks from StuffOfInterest
Thank you for participating in my RfA, which finished with a tally of 52/6/1 (~90%). It was an interesting process which gave me a chance to learn a bit about myself and about the community. My intention now is to slowly ease into using those additional buttons on my page. No use being over eager and mucking up the works. The support of all those who went over my record and/or rallied to my defense after the big oppose vote was instumental to the success of this review. Again, thank you! --StuffOfInterest 11:33, 10 October 2006 (UTC) |
[edit] My RfA
Just wanted to send a quick note of thanks for your support in my RfA. :-) I really appreciate it! Best, Irongargoyle 01:50, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] About My RfA :-)
Thanks for supporting me, too, Jcam! You were one of only two editors who supported me before the RfA was closed early. I didn't really expect to pass, anyway. I'll try again around February time. By then I plan to have a good three thousand edits and plenty of experience in admin related chores. Thanks again! -- P.B. Pilhet / Talk 02:46, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
P.B. Pilhet / Talk has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
- P.S. -- God bless you, too!
Thanks, Jcam! Again, I really appreciate the support! -- 00:33, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Florida
Thanks for the massive repair work!! I see from the diff that you had to clean up more than the 'two seansons' vandalism I tried to 'make funny'. Bo 13:09, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- No worries, dude. Actually it was kind of funny, disaster /clean-up seasons. Jcam 13:50, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Minnesota
Do you have a source for your mention of 30-40 t-storm days per year? -Ravedave (help name my baby) 02:05, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- cited Jcam 02:23, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Awesome.
I really need to stop checking that user's page (I'm sure you know of whom I speak), but your recent comments there made me smile, and even made me say "Right on." (Actually, what I really said was "Fuckin' A, man.") Thank you for that: being around here has been so stressful lately, and it's nice to remember that there are people who are not only civil themselves, but try to encourage others to be so. -- Merope 15:36, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- I don't even know what his "beef" is about or why he has an ax to grind with you, but if he thinks he has a legit concern, he should have gone about it in a totally different way. I kind of gave up on the "Girls go to Jupiter to get more stupider" talk in 5th grade- except for the rare occasion when I wanted to annoy one of my three sisters. I actually feel bad for him because he probably doesn't (and probably never will) see anything wrong with his attitude towards women. Jcam 16:06, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thor
For a full moment, I thought you were the person whose article I deleted seriously contending that the person was notable by reason of MySpace. It... it's been a long day. I think a Wiki-mini-break is in order. Have a wonderful weekend! -- Merope 22:58, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
u2 Jcam 00:38, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] My RfA
No worries.— Deon555talkReview 23:58, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Welcome!
Welcome to the Tropical Cyclone Wikiproject! Our Wikiproject is dedicated to high standards for writing articles about tropical cyclones, and as such our work has been mentioned by scholars and news reports from around the world. There are numerous ongoing projects occurring within the project, including providing the latest information on active tropical cyclones, and bettering existing articles for older storm articles. The next two items are template-form information letters to tropical cyclone participants. First is the ideal format for a tropical cyclone article, which we strongly encourage users to abide by due to our prominence as a leading area in information for tropical cyclones.
Dear Tropical cyclone editor,
As a member of the Tropical Cyclone Wikiproject, you are receiving this message to describe how you can better tropical cyclone articles. There are hundreds of tropical cyclone articles, though many of them are poorly organized and lacking in information. Using the existing featured articles as a guide line, here is the basic format for the ideal tropical cyclone article.
- Infobox- Whenever possible, the infobox should have a picture for the tropical cyclone. The picture can be any uploaded picture about the storm, though ideally it should be a satellite shot of the system. If that is not available, damage pictures, either during the storm or after the storm, are suitable. In the area that says Formed, indicate the date on which the storm first developed into a tropical depression. In the area that says Dissipated, indicate the date on which the storm lost its tropical characteristics. This includes when the storm became extratropical, or if it dissipated. If the storm dissipated and reformed, include the original start date and the final end date. Highest winds should be the local unit of measurement for speed (mph in non-metric countries, km/h in metric countries), with the other unit in parenthesis. The lowest pressure should be in mbars. Damages should, when available, be in the year of impact, then the present year. The unit of currency can be at your discretion, though typically it should be in USD. Fatalities indicate direct deaths first, then indirect deaths. Areas affected should only be major areas of impact. Specific islands or cities should only be mentioned if majority of the cyclone's effects occurred there.
- Intro- The intro for every article should be, at a minimum, 2 paragraphs. For more impacting hurricanes, it should be 3. The first should describe the storm in general, including a link to the seasonal article, its number in the season, and other statistics. The second should include a brief storm history, while the third should be impact.
- Storm history- The storm history should be a decent length, relatively proportional to the longevity of the storm. Generally speaking, the first paragraph should be the origins of the storm, leading to the system reaching tropical storm status. The second should be the storm reaching its peak. The third should be post-peak until landfall and dissipation. This section is very flexable, depending on meteorological conditions, but it should generally be around 3. Storm histories can be longer than three paragraphs, though they should be less than five. Anything more becomes excessive. Remember, all storm impacts, preparations, and records can go elsewhere. Additional pictures are useful here. If the picture in the infobox is of the storm at its peak, use a landfall picture in the storm history. If the picture in the infobox is of the storm at its landfall, use the peak. If the landfall is its peak, use a secondary peak, or even a random point in the storm's history.
- Preparations- The preparations section can be any length, depending on the amount of preparations taken by people for the storm. Hurricane watches and warnings need to be mentioned here, as well as the number of people evacuated from the coast. Include numbers of shelters, and other info you can find on how people prepared for the storm.
- Impact- For landfalling storms, the impact section should be the majority of the article. First, if the storm caused deaths in multiple areas, a death table would work well in the top level impact section. A paragraph of the general effects of the storm is also needed. After the intro paragraph, impact should be broken up by each major area. It depends on the information, but sections should be at least one paragraph, if not more. In the major impact areas, the first paragraph should be devoted to meteorological statistics, including rainfall totals, peak wind gusts on land, storm surge, wave heights, beach erosion, and tornadoes. The second should be actual damage. Possible additional paragraphs could be detailed information on crop damage or specifics. Death and damage tolls should be at the end. Pictures are needed, as well. Ideally, there would be at least one picture for each sub-section in the impact, though this sometimes can't happen. For storms that impact the United States or United States territories, this site can be used for rainfall data, including an image of rainfall totals.
- Aftermath- The aftermath section should describe foreign aid, national aid, reconstruction, short-term and long-term environmental effects, and disease. Also, the storm's retirement information, whether it happened or not, should be mentioned here.
- Records- This is optional, but can't hurt to be included.
- Other- The ideal article should have inline sourcing, with the {{cite web}} formatting being preferable. Always double check your writing and make sure it makes sense.
Good luck with future writing, and if you have a question about the above, don't hesitate to ask.
Here's a copy of our latest monthly newsletter.
The Hurricane Herald
This is the monthly newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The Hurricane Herald aims to give a summary, both of the activities of the WikiProject and global tropical cyclone activity. If you wish to change how you receive this newsletter, or no longer wish to receive it, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. The WikiProject has its own IRC channel.
Storm of the month
Hurricane Ioke is the most intense hurricane on record in the Central Pacific. After forming on August 19 to the south of Hawaii, Ioke moved to the northwest and hit Johnston Atoll as a Category 2 hurricane. It strengthened further as it moved to the west, reaching Category 5 strength on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Scale three times, twice in the Central Pacific and once in the Western Pacific. After the storm entered the Western Pacific it directly hit Wake Island. The storm finally became extratropical on September 7 but its extratropical remnants affected Alaska. Overall damage from Hurricane Ioke was light.
Other tropical cyclone activity
- 4 hurricanes formed in the Atlantic: Hurricane Florence, Hurricane Gordon, Hurricane Helene and Hurricane Isaac. Florence affected Bermuda and Newfoundland, and Gordon had effects in the Azores and Europe. Isaac is currently forecast to affect Newfoundland as an extratropical storm.
- The east Pacific saw three hurricanes and a tropical storm develop. Hurricane John and Hurricane Lane were both major hurricanes which hit Mexico, whilst Hurricane Kristy and Tropical Storm Miriam stayed clear of land. In addition, two tropical depressions formed in the Central Pacific.
- There were 4 typhoons in west Pacific during September. Typhoon Shanshan, Typhoon Yagi and Typhoon Xangsane formed in the west Pacific and Typhoon Ioke entered the basin from the east. Shanshan killed at least 9 people in Japan and Typhoon Xangsane, which is still active, killed at least 72 in the Philippines.
- Two tropical cyclones formed in the North Indian Ocean during September. Severe Cyclonic Storm Mukda formed in the Arabian Sea but did not affect land and Tropical Cyclone 05B formed in the Bay of Bengal before making landfall in India. However, the deadliest tropical system of September was a depression in the Bay of Bengal that killed more than 170 people in Bangladesh.
New and improved articles
- New storm articles include: Harry Cane of 1667, Hurricane Florence (2006), Hurricane Abby (1968) and Hurricane Lane (2006).
- New non-storm articles include: Monsoon trough, List of Pennsylvania hurricanes and Tropical cyclogenesis.
- New Good Articles include: Meteorological history of Hurricane Katrina, Hurricane John (2006), Typhoon Saomai (2006) and Tropical Storm Danielle (1992).
Main Page content
- Hurricane Katrina appeared on the Main Page as Today's Featured Article on September 29.
- There were no Did you know mentions. Please check for an interesting fact in any new articles and submit it to Template talk:Did you know.
New articles and improvements wanted
- Pacific hurricane, Pacific typhoon, North Indian tropical cyclone...
- There are many many stub and start class articles on many topics, please improve these!
- How about David Roth (meteorologist)?
Storm article statistics
Grade | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
---|---|---|---|---|
FA | 13 | 16 | 15 | 15 |
A | 6 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
GA | 18 | 24 | 28 | 33 |
B | 79 | 77 | 79 | 84 |
Start | 180 | 191 | 200 | 201 |
Stub | 8 | 8 | 8 | 13 |
Total | 303 | 322 | 337 | 352 |
percentage ≥Less than B |
62.0 | 61.8 | 61.7 | 60.8 |
Member of the month
The September member of the month is Thegreatdr, David Roth. David Roth is a meteorologist at the HPC, who as part of his work there is producing Tropical Cyclone Rainfall Data. Dozens of the maps he has created are used in Wikipedia articles. He has produced a number of valuable articles to the project such as tropical cyclone rainfall climatology and Atlantic hurricane reanalysis, and significantly expanded several seasonal articles such as 1982 Pacific hurricane season.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask anywhere. If you don't mind me asking, what area to you plan on contributing to? Remember, this is about tropical cyclones, not the Miami Hurricanes :P (Just messing...) Good luck, and have fun with your contributions in the future. Hurricanehink (talk) 15:56, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Editor review
I have finished your editor review. I hope it helps. Jcam 00:22, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking the time to look over my history here. It really is a help to get an outsider's perspective on how I'm doing.
- I get your point on voting for RFAs. Hadn't actually crossed my mind, but now that you mention it I probably should be at least a little active in there. If anything, it should give me a better feel for the process. I totally admit I was hasty in my first request.
- As for the sporradic editing in the past, you'd be surprised how much the dips corelate to the times in which I was playing World of Warcraft. Thankfully, I've kicked that addiction and I should be sitting at around 1000+ each month from here on in.
- Anywho, thanks again for the feedback. It's a great help. Cheers. :) --Brad Beattie (talk) 01:53, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you also for the good pointers that you have given me. They will definately help. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cbrown1023 (talk • contribs). 14:09, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 69.159.9.68
I suspect this user may have created an account, is there any way for us to track him/her down? --Cyktsui 05:50, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- I think if the IP is blocked, it will autoblock any account created. Jcam 05:53, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Dia duit!
Haha, tá fáilte romhat, is dóigh liom. Sláinte! hoopydinkConas tá tú? 21:52, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you for supporting my RfA
Thank you for your support in my RfA, which passed with a final tally of (56/0/2). It was great to see so much kind support from such competent editors and administrators as commented on my RfA.
I know I have much reading to do before I'll feel comfortable enough to use some of the more powerful admin tools, so I'll get right to it. P.S. – I promise I won't bite the heads off any small animals. |
[edit] Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #6
The November issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list.--Nilfanion (talk) 00:29, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] November Esperanza Newsletter
|
|
|
[edit] Thank you for your support!
23:42, 7 November 2006 (UTC) |
If I'm a bit pale in the face now, And if in the future |
[edit] Welcome to VandalProof! 1.3
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Jcam! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page and please note this is VP 1.3 not 1.2.2 see this for the approved list. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 15:12, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- PS sorry the last bach of welcomes failed to go out if you have readded your name can you please remove it thanks
[edit] Thank you
Hi Jcam, thanks a lot for your very flattering comments on my RFA. It passed and I value your acquaintance. Do let me know if I can be of assistance in any way -- Lost(talk) 17:49, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] My RfA:
Thank you so very much for voting support in my RfA. However, I have withdrawn due to reasons that a stressed user would withdraw under. I'm sorry I have failed you & your expectations. Thanks, Spawn Man 09:03, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] RfA thanks!
My RfA done I appreciate Anyway, I just |
EVula // talk // ☯ // 16:56, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] RfA thanks
Thank you so much, Jcam, for your support in my RfA, which passed on November 11, 2006, with a final tally of 82/0/2. I am humbled by the kind support of so many fellow Wikipedians, and I vow to continue to work and improve with the help of these new tools. Should you have any request, do not hesitate to contact me. Best regards, Húsönd 21:41, 11 November 2006 (UTC) |
[edit] Your message on User talk:StonedChipmunk
I thought that was excellent. Nice work. --Guinnog 16:49, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks for your input!
Thank you for taking part in my RfA. The RfA was not successful, mostly because I did a pretty bad job of presenting myself. I'll run again sometime in the next few months, in the hopes that some will reconsider.
In the meantime, one of the projects I'm working on is A Wikimedia Administrator's Handbook. This is a wikibook how-to guide intended to help new administrators learn the ropes, as well as to simply "demystify" what adminship entails. If you are an administrator, please help out with writing it, particularly on the technical aspects of the tools. Both administrators and non-administrators are welcome to help link in and sort all of the various policies regarding the use of these tools on wikipedia in particular (as well as other projects: for example, I have almost no experience with how things work on wiktionary or wikinews). Users who are neither familiar with policy or the sysop tools could be of great help by asking questions about anything that's unclear. The goal is to get everything together in one place, with a narrative form designed to anticipate the reader's next question.
A second project, related but not entailed, is a book on wikimedia in general, with a history of how various policies evolved over time, interesting trivia (e.g., what the heck was "wikimoney" about?), and a history of how the wikimedia foundation itself came about and the larger issues that occurred during its history (such as the infamous "Spanish Fork").
Again, thanks for your input on the RfA, and thanks in advance for any help you might be able to provide for the handbook. --SB_Johnny|talk|books 14:36, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] My RfA
My RfA passed with a tally of 71/1/0. Thank you very much for your support. I hope that my performance as an admin will not disappoint you. Please let me know if you see me doing anything inappropriate. -- Donald Albury 02:30, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Shiny new buttons
Two weeks ago I couldn't even spell administratur and now I are one (in no small part thanks to your support). Now that I checked out those new buttons I realize that I can unleash mutant monsters on unsuspecting articles or summon batteries of laser guns in their defense. The move button has now acquired special powers, and there's even a feature to roll back time. With such awesome new powers at my fingertips I will try to tread lightly to avoid causing irreversible damage and getting into any wheel wars. Thanks again and let me know whenever I can be of use.
|
[edit] About new political section
The new political section added to Charlotte County, Florida needs a source. Otherwise, remember WP:NPOV. FullMetal Falcon 00:01, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Virtual classroom lesson #2
Since you expressed concern about the itinerary at the MfD, I thought you might appreciate an update on goings-on at the VC... Well, we've moved on to our second lesson, though each lesson is continuous so I hope you will join in on the interface share and compare discussions as well. The current lesson focuses on "stubbing," with a short course to kick things off provided by our resident expert on the subject, Grutness. Please feel free to add your expertise and questions.
To help keep track of what's going on, here's a template you can place at the top of your userpage or talk page:
Hope to see you at the Virtual classroom again soon. The Transhumanist 14:21, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Grutness, Transhumanist:
That's great. I actually learned (more than) a few things reading that. I might just have to show up at the classroom soon Jcam 21:42, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Gilmore Girls
Lol, I wouldn't have noticed anyway, but OK. It'd be great if the popup tool ignored all edits by the user you're reverting back from when it's reverting... LibLord 22:09, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, vandals are getting smarter... Jcam 22:10, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] [Statement of gratitude]
[Your username name, not subst:ed properly], [statement of gratitude] for [your specific vote] in [link to request for adminship], which passed with a final tally of [final tally][percent in parentheses (optional)]. I plan to [statement of intentions regarding admin tools] and [statement acknowledging oppose votes as helpful]. If you [type of desire for help] or want to provide any [type of feedback], feel free to [link to talk page or e-mail]. [Statement of gratitude, again (optional)] [signature of new admin] |
Because people often complain that RfA thank-you messages are impersonal, I thought I'd give you the opportunity to create your own. -- tariqabjotu 03:42, 17 November 2006 (UTC)