User talk:Jayden54
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Yo Dawg
Ai G, hooz U gonna tak bout no'ing dat Bontrager iz uh Trek-owned company been all controvercial dawg? datz whack lik iz cancer section been only 3 word stings long dawg, how U gonna do a homie lik dat? "ooohh welllll, heee haaddd soomeee cancer but then heee won some race" FOOO, dis the lance armstrongs page nut da lance armstrongs winnin' dat race page. lance wud tell ya da most important shizzle nizzle hi hus liff was da beatin' of a cancer not da race, aight. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 160.39.153.161 (talk) 00:03, 25 November 2006
- I don't fully understand your comment (sorry), but I reverted your edits because they seemed a bit controversial. If you feel like it should be in there, please add it back, and I won't remove them again. However, another editor might though. If that happens, you might want to talk about it on the Talk page of the article. Thanks, and welcome to Wikipedia! Jayden54 23:08, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Reverting the Ric Ocasek article
Ric Ocasek, The Cars, Benjamin Orr, Greg Hawkes, Elliot Easton were updated (albums) by Tamara4006, why did you revert it back? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.215.26.175 (talk) 22:51, 25 November 2006
- I didn't revert the edits by Tamara4006, but I reverted the edits by 71.219.105.98 (as can be seen in the diff). Tamara4006 reverted her own edits (by removing the album) so you should ask her. I hope this clears everything up. Jayden54 21:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Kirkley
I have cleaned up the Kirkley article and removed your speedy tag; and I want to explain why. In general, geographic locations merit articles on WP. When, as here, they are full of rubbish, the normal practice is not to speedy them but to clean them up and stub them. I will understand if you do not agree. If so, then the way to go is to submit an AfD. If you do submit one I shall abstain due to my involvement hitherto. Please let me know if I can help, further. TerriersFan 00:40, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- It looks pretty good now, and it has some references to ascertain its notability, so I have no problems anymore with this article. It's just that when I saw it it was a complete mess and didn't seem notable at all. Since that's no longer the case I won't bring it to an AfD. Thanks for letting me know about this! Jayden54 10:07, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re:User talk:198.30.10.254
Hello Jayden54 I would like to inform you that 190.30.10.254 is a school IP address and that some of the people's edits may be inappriate, but some people at this school may need to make edits one day. 198.30.10.254 14:43, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know, and I will keep that in mind. I will see if I can add some sort of notice to the User talk page so others know this as well. Jayden54 15:58, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] You're quoted in the Washington Post
This article [1]. Near the bottom of the first page. Vizjim 15:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Wow, that's pretty cool. Thanks for letting me know, because I had no idea. Jayden54 16:54, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] marking CLOUDS - influential 60's Rock Group' for deletion
I don't accept your definition of Clouds not being 'notable'. If you read the sources I left at the foot of the page, you'd find all the sources and verification you need. A cursory glance at Amazon. com, both in the Uk and the Usa, will show you who Clouds were. If you checked the Clouds website (www.cloudsmusic.com) as I originally suggested, you'd find yet more articles and references, including the 4 page MOJO Magazine article about Clouds/1-2-3 which credited them with 'The Birth of Prog', and in which, David Bowie describles Billy Ritchie as 'an unrecognised genius'. 'The History of Scottish Rock & Pop' is a BBC book (Guinness Publishing) - there seems ample source confirmation of everything said in the article. Unless the criteria is something completely different than I understand it to be, I don't see how the band can be dismissed as 'not notable'. Please advise...thank you User:Matthew.Hartington11:25, 7 December 2006
- I've changed my vote to weak keep, as you're right about the band being more notable. Jayden54 12:58, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Pmanderson's RfA
I would ask that you revisit Pmanderson's RfA page to see the comments about his recent un-adminlike behavior. I don't believe he is ready for adminship. Skyemoor 03:56, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- I had a look at your comment, and some of the other comments by opposing voters but I'm not really convinced he's not ready. He's had a few civility problems, and 3RR violations, but it looks like he has cleaned up his act, so I'm sticking to my vote. Thanks for contacting me though. Jayden54 15:45, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Two cows AfD
I found and added 5 print sources which presented and discussed the joke. Edison 19:06, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know, and I've changed my vote because of this. Jayden54 15:44, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celtic warriors
This creator of this AfD discussion page had accidentally linked it to the Welsh rugby team of the same name. I have fixed the link and was wondering if you wanted to revise your comment. -- IslaySolomon | talk 17:19, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Ah, that makes sense, thanks for letting me know! Jayden54 17:28, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Approved for AWB!
Thank you for your recent application to use AutoWikiBrowser. I have approved your request and you should now be able to use the AWB application. Be sure to check every edit before you save it, and don't forget to check out the AWB Guide. You can get any help you need over on the AWB talk page. Feel free to contact me with any questions, Alphachimp 03:04, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks! Jayden54 09:09, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Young Hot Rod's deletion (So you say two albums should be required for an artist to have his own page?)
I think you should check WP:MUSIC again. It is only one of the criteria, and that page says any of the criteria would be sufficient. Tom Danson 22:02, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- I replied on the AFD page. Cheers, Jayden54 09:15, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
