Talk:James McCanney
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. [FAQ] | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics. | |
|
Please rate this article, and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
||
Should be moved to : Pseudoscience. McCanney is a contempary (idea wise) of Zecharia Sitchin and Richard C. Hoagland, who are already listed in that cat.
(Move Galileo and Copernicus while you're at it. Amazing how NASA is starting to incorporate what McCanney's been saying for thirty years - witness their constantly evolving dirty-snowballs-that-are-actually-hot-but-still-iceballs-even-though-there's-no-evidence -of-ice comet model, and recent introduction of discussions of the electrical nature of the universe into mainstream scientific symposia.)
Should we update his page to include this?
http://www.jmccanneyscience.com/
December 06, 2005 posting ... 3 new topics briefly ...
topic #1) word has it that the orders have gone out to the disinfo crew to flood the air waves ... main disinfo topics that they want to "grab headlines and then distort" ... tesla technology garnering free energy ... weather manipulation ... planet X and extra solar system objects (word is after my show announcement below they already started making a new video and are trying to pre-sell it with no topics or "stars") ... ancient disasters ... and last but not least ... promote the government disinformation imposters that have been set up for this purpose (the imposter "experts") ...
topic #2) the volcano outside of mexico city Popo is convulsing on a short erratic rhythm of less than 24 hours ... the dome inside the crater is rising and falling and large plumes are emitting from the caldera ... i just finished a real analysis of a potential mega tsunami that i have been mentioning in brief on my recent shows and here is the result ... IF Popo blows AND ruptures the local fault line it could extend into the north to release earth quakes around the ring of fire and even affect Sumatra ... HOWEVER the more serious effect COULD BE to carry south to the area of Patagonia and into the Antarctic sub ice shelf mountain ranges and drop the Ross Ice Shelf or other glaciers into the ocean in one action ... the mega tsunami of many thousands of feet would inundate the entire west coast of the americas and all of the islands of the pacific and the easterly populated area of australia and all of new zealand within 6 to 12 hours ... it would inundate alaska and japan and the yellow sea off of eastern china ... the reverberating surge would move through the drake passage off the tip of south america and would be reflected off the african coast to then inundate the entire eastern sea board of the USA within another 24 hours .... 95 % of the world's population would succumb to this disaster ... the final effect would be a rising of the earth's oceans by as much as 50 feet after the tsunamis receded ... THIS IS A POSSIBLE SCENARIO and from our vision of many off shore coastal ancient cities (just off shore under water) ... has this already happened in the past and will it happen again ???
topic #3) my show series on the science of the many planet Xs (extra solar system objects) starts this week with the december 08, 2005 thursday night show ... you will not want to miss this cohesive set of science lectures
Its from a couple weeks ago, but he keeps refereing back to it. Recommending that his listeners get ready for the end of the world.
[edit] New Content
Yes, McCanney is perceived as "eccentric" to put it mildly, but I feel his scientific contributions deserve re-examination. There are numerous examples throughout history of astrophysicists and astronomers who were perceived as "eccentric", therefore McCanney's scientific papers deserve consideration just as those of any other kooky but learned scientist might.
- removed snarky comment in first sentence as stark violation of Wiki's NPOV
- added introductions to McCanney's two most significant published astrophysics papers
- added 2 diagrams of ECM
- added 2 sections to elaborate the details of the two publications (coming soon)
- plan to add a section regarding predictions based on his hypotheses that may or may not have been proven (need to research this more deeply in near future) such as his successful predicion of sweeper moons in the saturnian rings
ottojack 16:42, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] "Scientific Contributions" section
I'm going to seek to modify this section later, if no one else does it. It makes claims about his contributions to science, but these contributions are the same crackpot theories that are explained elsewhere in the article. No where does the section explain that these are at all any more accepted than everything else he's said. There's no reason to have this section as it is. I also can not find anything on the "Continuing Galactic Formation Hypothesis" in any scientific publication, though I still have some sources to check. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 08:28, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
- Add "McCanney Writes:" to that. The Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a place for repeating a person's rants, verbatim. People can go to his website if they care to read it. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 08:39, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
- The hell with it, much of the other sections look in need of help as well. They're largely quotes and such directly from his website. Not good. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 08:41, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
