Talk:Jambi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Jambi is part of WikiProject Indonesia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. Please do not substitute this template.
|
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. |
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. |
|
|
|
[edit] Requested move
- oppose, too many other meanings. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 19:22, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
- support - Jambi Province is the primary meaning of the term. Other meanings can be found by the user on the disambiguation page. (MichaelJLowe 11:20, 26 September 2006 (UTC))
opposeSupport moving -I am afraid I have to oppose the idea, because I am a fan of Tool myself and they have a song called Jambi. There is also a city called Jambi. However,I do agree that Jambi (province) is the primary meaning, therefore it must not be on the disambiguation page. Imoeng 10:24, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- The disambiguation page is fine to cover the alternate meanings of Jambi. A song can't be compared in significance to the province containing 2.4 million people :-) (MichaelJLowe 11:41, 26 September 2006 (UTC))
-
- of course it can be _compared_. Maybe you look up the article comparison.
- Support — I think the name is primarily pointed to Jambi province. Though there is a song called Jambi or any other meanings, it can be linked via other disambiguation links from Jambi page, which is the province. — Indon (reply) — 10:59, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- It's not a question what YOU THINK. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 04:44, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Tobias, please respect the need for collaboration and consensus. Also, do not write posts like the one above that can appear "uncivil". --Merbabu 05:05, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Why is this uncivil? Indon wrote: "I think the name is primarily pointed to Jambi province." But this is of no big importance in a Wikipedia what one persons thinks. There should be provided objective facts. Thus I wrote: It's not a question what YOU THINK. . (...But a question of how it is) Tobias Conradi (Talk) 21:18, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- Tobias, I think that is the difference between us. I think, but you don't. — Indon (reply) — 08:53, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- Indeed I think the same. And I think that there are more differences then only one between us. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 21:18, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- No. Since you don't think, the above sentence is not correct. — Indon (reply) — 13:05, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
- Since my last message had two sentences I am not sure which one you refer to. Nevertheless, seems you have different definitions of the words since, you and thinking than me and wikipedia have or it has to do with your way of syntax iterpretation. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 14:34, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
- Since you are apparently "offering" english grammar lessons, perhaps you could inform us if there is any similarity between your seemingly new word iterpretation and interpretation? --Merbabu 11:34, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, wow!! Tobias, you should have this award. — Indon (reply) — 11:54, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- Since my last message had two sentences I am not sure which one you refer to. Nevertheless, seems you have different definitions of the words since, you and thinking than me and wikipedia have or it has to do with your way of syntax iterpretation. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 14:34, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
- No. Since you don't think, the above sentence is not correct. — Indon (reply) — 13:05, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
- Indeed I think the same. And I think that there are more differences then only one between us. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 21:18, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- Tobias, please respect the need for collaboration and consensus. Also, do not write posts like the one above that can appear "uncivil". --Merbabu 05:05, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- It's not a question what YOU THINK. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 04:44, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- support - i second the reasons put forward by michael, imoeng and indon --Merbabu 05:05, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Support --Yath 13:39, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Support. *drew 14:36, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
This article has been renamed as the result of a move request. Vegaswikian 20:01, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 3RR
unsigned misinformation from User_talk:Tobias Conradi Tobias Conradi (Talk) 04:44, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
I see what you're doing with Jambi (province). Be careful, what you are doing is in violation of WP:3RR. Let the discussion on the talk page pan out before you start feeling justified in repeatedly reverting the edits made to Jambi.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tobias_Conradi&diff=78044114&oldid=78037422
- That was me who made that comment. You don't have to go off the handle because I forgot to sign my post. Simply use the {{unsigned}} template next time. WP:3RR does not say that it is okay to revert any article less than 3 times in a 24 hour period, and you were caught in an edit war over Jambi. I was perhaps hasty to say it was a violation of WP:3RR, but whatever it was, it was bad form. --King Bee 17:05, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Agree, it was bad form to put a false WP:3RR violation allegation on my page without providing evidence and without signing it. Hopefully you will do it better the next time. Thanks for the template pointer, I will use it next time. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 21:23, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
