Jamal Abdullah Kiyemba

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jamal Kiyemba, also known as Jamal Abdullah, is a Ugandan citizen held in extrajudicial detention in the United States Guantanamo Bay detainment camps, in Cuba on suspicion of being a terrorist.[1]

Kiyemba's Guantanamo ISN is 701.[2] The Department of Defense states his birthdate is April 22, 1979.

After his father died, he came to the UK from Uganda to join his mother in 1993 when he was 14 years old, and completed his education in London. He has been granted indefinite leave to remain in the country, but is not a British citizen. Because of this, the British Government has declined to make representations on his behalf.[3]

Kiyemba's lawyer, Clive Stafford Smith, says that Kiyemba was a participant in a hunger strike which started in July, 2005 in protest at the conditions in the camp and alleged maltreatment, including alleged desecration of the Qur'an by American guards. The hunger strike ended on July 28, 2005 after promises were made to address the detainees concerns. Many detainees resumed the hunger strike on August 8, 2005, believing the camp authorities had not lived up to their promises.

Sam Kutesa, the Ugandan Minister of Foreign Affairs, was quoted on December 12, 2005 about his government's responsibility to intervene on Kiyemba's behalf.[4] He said: "I understand that Britain gave up on him. I am yet to look at the papers. We have to intervene, but this depends on the documents."

Contents

[edit] Combatant Status Review Tribunal

Combatant Status Review Tribunals were held in a small trailer, the same width, but shorter, than a mobile home.  The Tribunal's President sat in the big chair.  The detainee sat with their hands and feet shackled to a bolt in the floor in the white, plastic garden chair.  A one way mirror behind the Tribunal President allowed observers to observe clandestinely.  In theory the open sessions of the Tribunals were open to the press.  Three chairs were reserved for them.  In practice the Tribunal only intermittently told the press that Tribunals were being held.  And when they did they kept the detainee's identities secret.  In practice almost all Tribunals went unobserved.
Enlarge
Combatant Status Review Tribunals were held in a small trailer, the same width, but shorter, than a mobile home. The Tribunal's President sat in the big chair. The detainee sat with their hands and feet shackled to a bolt in the floor in the white, plastic garden chair. A one way mirror behind the Tribunal President allowed observers to observe clandestinely. In theory the open sessions of the Tribunals were open to the press. Three chairs were reserved for them. In practice the Tribunal only intermittently told the press that Tribunals were being held. And when they did they kept the detainee's identities secret. In practice almost all Tribunals went unobserved.

Initially the Bush administration asserted that they could withhold all the protections of the Geneva Conventions to captives from the war on terror. This policy was challenged before the Judicial branch. Critics argued that the USA could not evade its obligation to conduct a competent tribunals to determine whether captives are, or are not, entitled to the protections of prisoner of war status.

Subsequently the Department of Defense instituted the Combatant Status Review Tribunals. The Tribunals, however, were not authorized to determine whether the captives were lawful combatants -- rather they were merely empowered to make a recommendation as to whether the captive had previously been correctly determined to match the Bush administration's definition of an enemy combatant.

Kiyemba chose to participate in his Combatant Status Review Tribunal.[1]

[edit] Administrative Review Board hearing

Detainees who were determined to have been properly classified as "enemy combatants" were scheduled to have their dossier reviewed at annual Administrative Review Board hearings. The Administrative Review Boards weren't authorized to review whether a detainee qualified for POW Xstatus, and they weren't authorized to review whether a detainee should have been classified as an "enemy combatant".

They were authorized to consider whether a detainee should continue to be detained by the United States, because they continued to pose a threat -- or whether they could safely be repatriated to the custody of their home country, or whether they could be set free.

The factors for and against continuing to detain Kiyemba were among the 121 that the Department of Defense released on March 3, 2006.[5]

Kiyemba chose to participate in his Administrative Review Board hearing.[6]

[edit] The following primary factors favor continued detention:

a. Commitment
  1. Detainee stated that any system like a democracy, which tries to end Sharia law, is worthy of a Jihad against it.
  2. The detainee knew that Afghanistan (AF) lived under Sharia law before September 11, 2001.
  3. After September 11, 2001, the detainee traveled from England to Iran then to Pakistan in an attempt to travel to Afghanistan in order to fight in the Jihad.
b. Training
  1. While waiting in Pakistan on his way to AF, the detainee received weapons training on the Ak-48. The detainee learned how to shoot, assemble and disassemble the weapon.
c. Intent
  1. Detainee stated that he traveled to Afghanistan to try to stop the aggression against the innocent.
  2. While attempting to travel from Pakistan to Afghanistan in order to fight in the Jihad, the detainee was arrested at the border.
  3. Detainee stated that if he had a weapon, he might attack Camp Delta guards.
  4. Detainee stated that he would go fight Jihad in the future if he found a way.

[edit] The following primary factors favor release or transfer:

  • Detainee has stated that he would never be a threat.
  • Detainee stated that September 11, 2001 was a terrorist attack against women and children, which is never warranted.
  • Detainee stated that he does not support what happened on September 11, 2001.
  • Detainee stated that he has never been a part of an organization or laundered any money.

[edit] Statement

Kiyemba, on the advice of his lawyer, had told his Assisting Military Officer that he should decline to answer any questions. But he did agree to give an oral statement.

He told his Board that he hoped to return to England, complete his education, get married and live a normal life. He said he was not a threat to the USA or the UK. While he said he hadn't always been treated well, while in detention, he thought most Americans were kind and decent people. He said he understood how the shock of 9-11 could trigger an over-reaction. He said he bore no ill-will due to his detention. He thought the attacks of 9-11 were terribly wrong and that he believed in settling differences through peaceful means.

[edit] Release

Kiyemba was transferred to the United Kingdom in the winter of 2006, according to Ugandan paper New Visions.[7] Kiyemba was denied entry to the United Kingdom, and deported to Uganda. He was detained in Ugandan custody for two months, and released on April 18, 2006.

[edit] References

  1. ^ a b Sumarrized transcripts (.pdf), from Jamal Abdullah Kiyemba's Combatant Status Review Tribunal - pages 21-23
  2. ^ list of prisoners (.pdf), US Department of Defense, May 15, 2006
  3. ^ Five still held without help or hope, The Times, January 12, 2005
  4. ^ Guantanamo Inmate to Return to Uganda, All Africa, December 12, 2005
  5. ^ Factors for and against the continued detention (.pdf) of Jamal Abdullah Kiyemba Administrative Review Board - pages 74-75
  6. ^ Summarized transcript (.pdf), from Jamal Abdullah Kiyemba's Administrative Review Board hearing - page 69
  7. ^ Uganda Frees Ex-Gitmo Detainee Jamal Kiyemba, cageprisoners, April 18, 2006

[edit] External links