Image talk:Jaggery.jpg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Info from Wikipedia:Image sleuthing

• Used in Jaggery
• Gorgeous photo. This can't be a personal photo. . . can it? – Quadell ^{(talk) (sleuth)} 21:32, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)
• Wow - after some extensive searching, I'd say it can - and a damn good one too! Nrbelex ^(talk) 06:24, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Amazing. That's National Geographic quality. If it makes it through the gauntlet, I'm nominating it as a featured image. – Quadell ^{(talk) (sleuth)} 14:02, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)
• Which of course is the question: Perhaps the reason it is National Geographic quality is that it is scanned from the National Geographic. . . — Zeimusu | Talk 16:08, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Still digging. . . – Quadell ^{(talk) (sleuth)} 17:30, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)
• I looked through images at nationalgeographic.com based on all keywords I could think of, and turned up nothing. Also, the Image Description says "Traditional Jaggery Making Process. Bangalore-Mysore highway, India - September 2004" Either the magazine was published in September 04 or, more likely, that's when the uploader took the photo. Using this info, I still couldn't find the photo anywhere. – Quadell ^{(talk) (sleuth)} 19:31, Mar 20, 2005 (UTC)
• Is image file size ever a useful clue to origin?.. this photo is >500k - would a photo nicked off the web be so large? Pcb21| Pete 12:35, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • No, but a scan from a physical magazine might be. – Quadell ^{(talk) (sleuth)} 14:39, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
• I've left a question on the user's talk page, but his/her last contribution was in October. --Tagishsimon (talk)

User declares that copywright belongs to him. Asked him to mark the image with appropriate template. —Clarknova 05:00, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

Actually, you asked me, not The.lawrd. Easy mistake to make. --Tagishsimon (talk)

• Good photo--Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut, which held its ground 14:54, 25 August 2006 (UTC)