User talk:JackSparrow Ninja
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Please stop ad-placing Land of the Legend
In the Phantom Hourglass article, you changed a distributor citation to a fan site citation. I have reverted it to a citation of my own site because we verified in July 2006 Phantom Hourglass was delayed until 2007, which was verified by other sites after we announced it. Additionally, in September 2006, NOA's press site updated to reflect the 2006 schedule, which showed PH not in the 2006 schedule. We got confirmation from both NOA and NOE that PH was not being released in 2006, and in North America, not before March 2007, and we also reported on this. You also have made reverts on the Twilight Princess page. The most embarrassing edit you made was about The Wind Waker 2, which was a report made by IGN after GDC 2004 in which they had the only image proving that fact about it. Land of the Legend has no authority over IGN on that matter because it was proved via a live photograph of the claim (TWW 2 as a title). Also, the LotL "pre-release" guide is nothing but a compilation of info from other sources, and using LotL's reference there, rather than original, verifiable sources is detrimental to the integrity of this encyclopedia. I have officially filed a complaint with the administration that you are tampering with articles and trying to advertise Land of the Legend with seocnd-hand citations. Please change because you are very active and do make better contributions, but your bias for Land of the Legend is ruining you. --TSA 06:53, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
Most of the discussions that I had been a part of were fairly civil, even if a particular user's reliability was in question. I hadn't meant to start any kind of spam war, or anything of the sort; simply to bring up that I found it funny that as much as I had heard TSA's name associated with false rumors leading up to the Twilight Princess release I was wondering why he was cited for the article. It was my fault for not actually looking at the source, so I apologize for any unnecessary argument that resulted in my question. -- Mellesime 08:35, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] IGN
It can be verified that IGN is more often correct than they are incorrect. As I said, all you need to know is that Wikipedia - not me - says verifiability is more important than truth. - A Link to the Past (talk) 01:12, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Land of the Legend
You explain, right here, right now, why Land of the Legend is verifiable - and yes, a source CAN be verified. Am I to understand you disagree with the idea of sources being verified as to whether or not they can be used? We have to verify if they can be used. If we can, it is verifiable. If not, it is unverifiable. As it stands, you have yet to verify this source. - A Link to the Past (talk) 19:17, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- They never do citations. --TSA 19:42, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your reliability page is a joke
So I fixed it up. --TSA 20:34, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Hello, concerning your contribution, Image:Bahrain International Circuit.jpg, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.bahraingp.com.bh/virtual-tracks.html. As a copyright violation, Image:Bahrain International Circuit.jpg appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Bahrain International Circuit.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on [[Talk::Image:Bahrain International Circuit.jpg]]. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Image:Bahrain International Circuit.jpg, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Alexj2002 22:23, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
