Talk:Jack Vettriano

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

It was reported in yesterday's Independent, the many of Jack Vettriano's most famous images were actually copied directly from an artistic reference book. [1] (unfortunately the online edition doesn't have the illustrations to compare). This story has now been reported in several other places. [2], but they only show the copied dancers. Jooler 06:51, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

You could just hear the collective gleeful chuckle from the art establishment as they read their papers over a cup of Earl Grey yesterday ;-)

The BBC news is one of the few websites to show the comparison. However I guess it is not at all uncommon to use reference sources to construct compositions and the argument that it doesn't particularly detract from the popularity of the painting is quite valid. It will be open season on finding the sources for most of his other paintings now... -- Solipsist 09:27, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

This revelation did little to tarnish Vettriano's reputation, however. -- I find this sentence a little puzzling and think perhaps it should be deleted. Does it really mean it didn't lower the monetary value of his paintings? His reputation among critics was never high in the first place, and how exactly do we know what the print-buyer in the street thinks about it? Flapdragon 16:23, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

"He uses himself and a model for all his paintings." - given the revelation that he uses/used reference books, this statement is obviously incorrect. duncan 10:38, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

FyiFoff 00:04, 20 November 2006 (UTC) I never heard of him until I just found his 2007 calendar. Is there a "master list" of drawings he did that are "copies" from photographes(which in a way is a drawing but done with a camera)? In school I was told if you altered an image 10% you could say this is your drawing rather then my verison of so and so. Did he alter the images or copy layout 100%? FyiFoff FyiFoff 00:04, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

In some respects, this shouldn't be overplayed. If you check some of the externally linked stories on this issue (if those links are still active), you can see that Vettriano largely uses the photographs in old dancing guides as a starting point for the poses of figures in his paintings. Other folks use those wooden manequins. In The Singing Butler, the pose of the central two figures is taken from a dancing book, but for the most part what makes the painting is its style and atmosphere. -- Solipsist 21:46, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

00:35, 22 November 2006 (UTC)thanks, I didn't think it was that bad, people only don't like art copying art, art copying a photo has never been that bad of a "art crime". Is there any information who "broke the news"? FyiFoff00:35, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Singing Butler

Yes, there is a direct link to a picture in the text, but doesn't this famous painting deserved to be thumbnailed on the side of the article? -- User:81.99.181.231 17:02, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

Its an idea. The picture would of course be still under copyright (I guess we could now claim it is a derivative work of the dancing manual ;-) but as that was published in 1987 its photos would most likely still be copyright in any case). However, if you could find an example of the painting on Vettriano's own web site, or perhaps a gallery representing him, then it might be possible to use it under Fair use provisions as long as it was small enough that it couldn't be used by anyone in place of say buying the postcard of it. -- Solipsist 19:26, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

The link doesn't seem to work any more so I have deleted it. It seems to be common Wikipedia practice in such cases to use a small image of a famous picture under fair use. Flapdragon 16:26, 15 December 2005 (UTC)