Talk:Jack Napier (porn star)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Letter
Why is this letter still up? Shouldn't someone remove it and incorporate the information in the letter into the article itself? ERADEKator 02:48, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Well, the quick answer to that is be bold and do it yourself. However, the long answer is that we really prefer to write our articles from verifiable materials, not just a letter from someone claiming to be JN. Verifiable means we need something that someone else can look up - a book, a magazine, a web page. AnonEMouse (squeak) 13:53, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] NPOV edits
I'm deleting/altering some of the sections that most gratuitously violate the NPOV. Super Jedi Droid is totally right about this thing; it's written almost to sound stupid. Dkostic 17:25, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Apparent Copyright Infringement
A big chunk of this article appears to be lifted directly from here: [1]. I'm deleting the offending sections. Dkostic 17:19, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Expansion required
This article is in desperate need of expansion with information from reliable sources. If you care to help in this, please do so; if you care to help develop other aticles, please see WP:P*#Articles. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud — WP:PORN BIO? 16:20, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] External links
Moved from brenneman's talk
You removed most of the external links from this article, commenting this was per WP:External links. I restored, and want to discuss. I am not sure which part of that those links would contradict; since it's an article about a porn star, presumably "tasteful" must be interpreted within the context. :-). Also the reason the article was kept around rather than removed by PROD is due to the actor's >100 film appearances, so linking to a list of those appearances would seem to be required. AnonEMouse (squeak) 14:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- *chuckle* I have no idea what "tasteful" means. I wear stripes with spots. But with regards to this, per the guideline, the removed links do not "provide a unique resource." If there is one in particular that anyone feels should be replaced, I'm happy to discuss it here. - brenneman {L} 00:47, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Rewording?
Now, I realize this is an article about a porn star, but it reads like an ad for a (very) cheesy porn convention biopic. Can someone figure out how to reword this without ruining it? Super Jedi Droid 06:33, 24 September 2006 (UTC)