User talk:J.L.Main

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] In case you were wondering…

Concerning "the downfall of civilized culture and destroy wikipedia as we know it," this is not the reason. The reason can be found in these pages.

• [1] - Read the second green paragraph.
• [2] - Read the edit comment.
• [3] - Read the edit comment.

Nice to meet you! Jecowa 04:16, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

nice to meet you too. thanks for the links. now i know what i'm up against. basically a guy with a chip on his sholder:)J.L.Main 19:56, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Wiimote

I am for mentioning the term Wiimote in the Wii article. Sorry to confuse you. I'm guessing you were confused by those links that I listed above. Did I guess correctly? I'm sorry for not explaining what I was trying to say very well. I thought you might be interested in those links to see why some views wouldn't want to mention "Wiimote" in the Wii article. I didn't make the edits of the three links listed above. If you check those links again you will see that I did not make those edits. I only listed those links to show you the reasoning that the opposition uses for not including "Wiimote" in the article. I am for mentioning "Wiimote" in the Wii article. If you look at those links again you will see. I did not make those edits. Jecowa 08:57, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Oh if you mean this edit, I was only telling that guy that "Wiimote" isn't the official name for English-speaking countries. That doesn't mean that I think it shouldn't be included. Jecowa 15:28, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wildwood Christian School

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Wildwood Christian School, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Wildwood Christian School. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Frexes 04:17, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Diabolik2345

(Please this is not vandalism i am Diabolik2345 and I dont know how to use Wikipidia except for editing stuff)

[edit] Re: History of video game consoles (eighth generation)

You'll never know unless you try. The article might be deleted for speculation, but the fact that there will be eighth gen consoles is not speculative. Microsoft, Sony, and Nintendo fave already mentioned them a little. Of course Apple is secretive. The History of video game consoles (eighth generation) article has been deleted before, the last time being two months ago, but your version is much better than the previous ones. You have a lot of sources; that should make it less likely for people to AfD it. I would go ahead and try it. Jecowa 02:33, 13 December 2006 (UTC) P.S. TouchLight looks fine to me. I think the only thing else it needs is some categories to go in.

I just noticed that PlayStation 4 was deleted six days ago and Xbox 720 was deleted thirteen days ago, but things that aren't worthy of their own article can often be grouped into a list that is acceptable. There is an article about bids that cities are considering making a few years down the road. Jecowa 03:57, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User notice: temporary 3RR block

[edit] Regarding reversions[4] made on December 13, 2006 to Wii

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

The duration of the block is 24 hours. William M. Connolley 18:13, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

i didn't rv. 4 times on the 13th. that is incorrect. only 2 occured on the 13th. by a purly legalistic standpoints i have not violated the 3 edit rule as two occured one day and 2 the day before.

also, i miscounted. it was an accident. i thought i only had 3.J.L.Main 00:49, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

You were blocked for your December 12 violation of WP:3RR. Dionyseus 01:30, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

but i didn't violate it on the twelfth either. the rule is violated if you revert more than 3 times and i only verteded it 3 times on the 12th. the 1st edit doesn't count as i wasn't adding wiimote. o, and Dionyseus, i understand you dislike me, but thats not a good enough reason to vote for deleting an artical.J.L.Main 03:17, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

The three revert rule applies to a 24-hour period. It does not reset at the start of each day. Jecowa 03:19, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

o... in that case i'm guilty. sorryJ.L.Main 03:21, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

ok, i'll be back tomorrow when my ban is up. i'll need to be more careful in the future. and if anyone wants to spam William M. Connolley i would be most appreciative. or making up reasons why he shouldn't be an admin sounds like a fun way to pass the time. you could turn it into a party game. can i edit my home page?J.L.Main 03:58, 14 December 2006 (UTC)