IPsec
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
IPsec (IP security) is a suite of protocols for securing Internet Protocol (IP) communications by encrypting and/or authenticating each IP packet in a data stream. IPsec also includes protocols for cryptographic key establishment.
There are two modes of IPsec operation: transport mode and tunnel mode.
In transport mode only the payload (message) of the IP packet is encrypted. It is fully routable since the IP header is sent as plain text; however, it cannot cross NAT interfaces, as this will invalidate its hash value. Transport mode is used for host-to-host communications.
In tunnel mode, the entire IP packet is encrypted. It must then be encapsulated into a new IP packet for routing to work. Tunnel mode is used for network-to-network communications (secure tunnels between routers) or host-to-network and host-to-host communications over the Internet.
IPsec is implemented by a set of cryptographic protocols for (1) securing packet flows and (2) internet key exchange. Of the former, there are two:
- Authentication Header (AH) provides authentication, payload (message) and IP header integrity — and with some cryptography algorithm also non-repudiation — but it does not offer confidentiality.
- Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) provides data confidentiality, payload (message) integrity, and with some cryptography algorithm also authentication.
It may be easier to understand the difference between AH and ESP by thinking of AH as an open envelope that lists the sender and recipient whereas ESP would do the same but the envelope would be closed and sealed.
In some countries message encryption is prohibited by law and ESP protocol may not be used. In this case AH provides entire IPsec functionality (without confidentiality).
Originally AH was only used for integrity and ESP was used only for encryption; authentication functionality was added subsequently to ESP due to performance advantages. The key exchange protocols, as defined by IPsec, include the IKE (Internet Key Exchange) protocol and its successor, IKEv2.
IPsec protocols operate at the network layer, layer 3 of the OSI model. Other Internet security protocols in widespread use, such as SSL and TLS, operate from the transport layer up (OSI layers 4 - 7). This makes IPsec more flexible, as it can be used for protecting both TCP- and UDP-based protocols, but increases its complexity and processing overhead, as it cannot rely on TCP (OSI layer 4) to manage reliability and fragmentation.
Contents |
[edit] Current status as a standard
IPsec is an obligatory part of IPv6, and is optional for use with IPv4. While the standard is designed to be indifferent to IP versions, current widespread deployment and experience concerns IPv4 implementations. IPsec protocols were originally defined by RFCs 1825–1829, published in 1995. In 1998, these documents were obsoleted by RFCs 2401–2412. 2401–2412 are not compatible with 1825–1829, although they are conceptually identical. In December 2005, third-generation documents, RFCs 4301–4309, were produced. They are largely a superset of 2401–2412, but provide a second Internet Key Encryption standard. These third-generation documents standardized the abbreviation of IPsec to uppercase “IP” and lowercase “sec”.
It is unusual to see any product that offers RFC1825–1829 support. “ESP” generally refers to 2406, while ESPbis refers to 4303.
[edit] Design intent
IPsec was intended to provide either transport mode: end-to-end security of packet traffic in which the end-point computers do the security processing, or tunnel mode: portal-to-portal communications security in which security of packet traffic is provided to several machines (even to whole LANs) by a single node.
IPsec can be used to create Virtual Private Networks (VPN) in either mode, and this is the dominant use. Note, however, that the security implications are quite different between the two operational modes.
End-to-end communication security on an Internet-wide scale has been slower to develop than many had expected. Part of the reason is that no universal, or universally trusted, Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) has emerged (DNSSEC was originally envisioned for this); part is that many users understand neither their needs nor the available options well enough to promote inclusion in vendors' products.
Since the Internet Protocol does not inherently provide any security capabilities, IPsec was introduced to provide security services such as:
- Encrypting traffic (so it cannot be read by parties other than those for whom it is intended)
- Integrity validation (ensuring traffic has not been modified along its path)
- Authenticating the peers (ensuring that traffic is from a trusted party)
- Anti-replay (protection against replay of the secure session)
[edit] Technical details
[edit] Authentication Header (AH)
Authentication Header (AH) is intended to guarantee connectionless integrity and data origin authentication of IP datagrams. Further, it can optionally protect against replay attacks by using the sliding window technique and discarding old packets. AH protects the IP payload and all header fields of an IP datagram except for mutable fields, i.e. those that might be altered in transit. Mutable, therefore unauthenticated, IP header fields include TOS, Flags, Fragment Offset, TTL and Header Checksum. AH operates directly on top of IP using IP protocol number 51.
An AH packet diagram:
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
Next Header | Payload Length | RESERVED | |
Security Parameters Index (SPI) | |||
Sequence Number | |||
Authentication Data (variable) |
Field meanings:
- Next Header
- Identifies the protocol of the transferred data.
- Payload Length
- Size of AH packet.
- RESERVED
- Reserved for future use (all zero until then).
- Security Parameters Index (SPI)
- Identifies the security parameters in combination with IP address.
- Sequence Number
- A monotonically increasing number, used to prevent replay attacks.
- Authentication Data
- Contains the data necessary to authenticate the packet.
[edit] Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)
The Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) extension header provides origin authenticity, integrity, and confidentiality protection of a packet. ESP also supports encryption-only and authentication-only configurations, but using encryption without authentication is strongly discouraged. Unlike the AH header, the IP packet header is not accounted for. ESP operates directly on top of IP using IP protocol number 50.
An ESP packet diagram:
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
Security Parameters Index (SPI) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequence Number | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Payload * (variable) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Padding (0-255 bytes) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pad Length | Next Header | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Authentication Data (variable) |
Field meanings:
- Security Parameters Index (SPI)
- Identifies the security parameters in combination with IP address
- Sequence Number
- A monotonically increasing number, used to prevent replay attacks.
- Payload Data
- The data to be transferred.
- Padding
- Used with some block ciphers to pad the data to the full length of a block.
- Pad Length
- Size of padding in bytes.
- Next Header
- Identifies the protocol of the transferred data.
- Authentication Data
- Contains the data used to authenticate the packet.
[edit] Implementations
IPsec support is usually implemented in the kernel with key management and ISAKMP/IKE negotiation carried out from user-space. Existing IPsec implementations tend to include both of these functionalities. However, as there is a standard interface for key management, it is possible to control one kernel IPsec stack using key management tools from a different implementation.
Because of this, there is confusion as to the origins of the IPsec implementation that is in the Linux kernel. The FreeS/WAN project made the first complete and open source implementation of IPsec for Linux. It consists of a kernel IPsec stack (KLIPS), as well as a key management daemon (pluto) and many shell scripts. The FreeS/WAN project was disbanded in March 2004. Openswan and strongSwan are continuations of FreeS/WAN. The KAME project also implemented complete IPsec support for NetBSD, FreeBSD. Its key management daemon is called racoon. OpenBSD made its own ISAKMP/IKE daemon, simply named isakmpd (that was also ported to other systems, including Linux).
However, none of these kernel IPsec stacks was integrated into the Linux kernel. Alexey Kuznetsov and David S. Miller wrote a kernel IPsec implementation from scratch for the Linux kernel around the end of 2002. This stack was subsequently released as part of Linux 2.6, and is referred variously as "native" or "NETKEY".
Therefore, contrary to popular belief, the Linux IPsec stack did not originate from the KAME project. As it supports the standard PF_KEY protocol (RFC 2367) and the native XFRM interface for key management, the Linux IPsec stack can be used in conjunction with either pluto from Openswan/strongSwan, isakmpd from OpenBSD project, racoon from the KAME project or without any ISAKMP/IKE daemon (using manual keying).
There are a number of implementations of IPsec and ISAKMP/IKE protocols. These include:
- NRL [1] IPsec, one of the original sources of IPsec code [2]
- OpenBSD, with its own code derived from NRL IPsec
- the KAME stack, that is included in Mac OS X, NetBSD and FreeBSD
- "IPsec" in Cisco IOS Software [3]
- "IPsec" in Microsoft Windows, including Windows XP[4], Windows 2000[5], and Windows 2003[6]
- SafeNet QuickSec toolkits [7]
- IPsec in Solaris [8]
- IBM AIX operating system
- IBM z/OS
- IPsec and IKE in HP-UX (HP-UX IPSec)
- "IPsec and IKE" in VxWorks [9]
[edit] See also
- Information security
- Year 2005 saw the standardization of a UDP encapsulation mechanism for NAT traversal: NAT-T
- Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP)
[edit] Overview of IPsec-related RFCs
- RFC 2367
- PF_KEY Interface
- RFC 2401 (obsoleted by RFC 4301)
- Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol
- RFC 2402 (obsoleted by RFC 4302 and RFC 4305)
- Authentication Header
- RFC 2403
- The Use of HMAC-MD5-96 within ESP and AH
- RFC 2404
- The Use of HMAC-SHA-1-96 within ESP and AH
- RFC 2405
- The ESP DES-CBC Cipher Algorithm With Explicit IV
- RFC 2406 (obsoleted by RFC 4303 and RFC 4305)
- Encapsulating Security Payload
- RFC 2407 (obsoleted by RFC 4306)
- IPsec Domain of Interpretation for ISAKMP (IPsec DoI)
- RFC 2408 (obsoleted by RFC 4306)
- Internet Security Association and Key Management Protocol (ISAKMP)
- RFC 2409 (obsoleted by RFC 4306)
- Internet Key Exchange (IKE)
- RFC 2410
- The NULL Encryption Algorithm and Its Use With IPsec
- RFC 2411
- IP Security Document Roadmap
- RFC 2412
- The OAKLEY Key Determination Protocol
- RFC 2451
- The ESP CBC-Mode Cipher Algorithms
- RFC 2857
- The Use of HMAC-RIPEMD-160-96 within ESP and AH
- RFC 3526
- More Modular Exponential (MODP) Diffie-Hellman groups for Internet Key Exchange (IKE)
- RFC 3706
- A Traffic-Based Method of Detecting Dead Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Peers
- RFC 3715
- IPsec-Network Address Translation (NAT) Compatibility Requirements
- RFC 3947
- Negotiation of NAT-Traversal in the IKE
- RFC 3948
- UDP Encapsulation of IPsec ESP Packets
- RFC 4106
- The Use of Galois/Counter Mode (GCM) in IPsec Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)
- RFC 4301 (obsoletes RFC 2401)
- Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol
- RFC 4302 (obsoletes RFC 2402)
- IP Authentication Header
- RFC 4303 (obsoletes RFC 2406)
- IP Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)
- RFC 4304
- Extended Sequence Number (ESN) Addendum to IPsec Domain of Interpretation (DOI) for Internet Security Association and Key Management Protocol (ISAKMP)
- RFC 4305 (obsoletes RFC 2404 and RFC 2406)
- Cryptographic Algorithm Implementation Requirements for Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) and Authentication Header (AH)
- RFC 4306 (obsoletes RFC 2407, RFC 2408, and RFC 2409)
- Internet Key Exchange (IKEv2) Protocol
- RFC 4307
- Cryptographic Algorithms for Use in the Internet Key Exchange Version 2 (IKEv2)
- RFC 4308
- Cryptographic Suites for IPsec
- RFC 4309
- Using Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) CCM Mode with IPsec Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)
- RFC 4478
- Repeated Authentication in Internet Key Exchange (IKEv2) Protocol
- RFC 4543
- The Use of Galois Message Authentication Code (GMAC) in IPsec ESP and AH
- RFC 4555
- IKEv2 Mobility and Multihoming Protocol (MOBIKE)
- RFC 4621
- Design of the IKEv2 Mobility and Multihoming (MOBIKE) Protocol
[edit] External links
- Kame Project
- racoon and ipsec-tools
- IETF IPsec WG has "concluded", archive of the page is here
- IPsec WG still has important active drafts
- All IETF active security WGs
- Securing Data in Transit with IPsec
- Free S/WAN project homepage.
- Openswan project homepage.
- strongSwan project homepage.
- Free IPSec VPN Client for Windows.
- The VPN Consortium.
- A long thread on the ipsec@lists.tislabs.com about the capitalization of the letter S in IPsec. The RFCs indicate that it is spelled "IPsec".
- An Illustrated Guide to IPsec
- A minimal IPsec implementation for embedded systems
- ipsec(4) man page via OpenBSD
- IPsec in VoIP Networks TISPAN has recently selected UDP encapsulation of IPsec to secure signalling in IMS based networks. This paper looks at the issues of IPsec and NAT traversal which lead TISPAN to its choice.
- Windows XP IPSec HowTo
- A Cryptographic Tour of the IPsec Standards
- Lost in Translation: Theory and Practice in Cryptography - Lessons from the discovery of an IPsec flaw