From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is part of WikiProject Macintosh. This means that the WikiProject has identified it as an article pertaining to Apple Computer, but is not currently working to improve it. WikiProject Macintosh itself is an attempt to improve, grow, standardize, and attain featured status for Wikipedia's articles related to Apple Macintosh and Apple Computer. We need all your help, so join in today!
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.

[edit] Merger w/ iPod

• Strongly Object - iPod photo was at one time its own separate product line, and thus has its own history and deserves its own entry. raekwon 16:11, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
• Object to merger - essentially for the same reasons as Raekwon above. Grstain 18:15, July 13, 2005 (UTC)
• Support It's a marketing term for a particular feature of what was essentially just another in a long line of iPod models. Just because it was branded a bit differently doesn't make it notable. I'll also note that the February 2005 models even had "photo" removed from the product packaging. --Dtcdthingy 23:37, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Actually, the word "photo" just had its size reduced in the packaging, not removed, presumably because at that point, Apple was preparing for the lines to merge in June. raekwon 02:49, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
• Object – for Raekwon's reason. And the iPod article is already rather long. —RadRafe 11:41, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
• Support Since all current iPods include color screens and the photo display capabilties I don't see an seperate article about the now defunct iPod photo line being able to provide anough information not allready covered in the iPod article to be worth it. The two articles should be merged. The usefull information from --Cab88 15:18, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
• Strongly Object - being its own Product line, with the original iPod in 4 lines with the iPod photo being a line one, well, I guess my argument is the same as Raekwon's. --05:02, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
• Object - Yes all Full iPods now have cololor screens that dosen't change the fact that the iPod photo was its own line wich means it should have seprate history!
• Object - They were different at one point and this page should remain to reflect that. shinyplasticbag
• Object for some of the reasons above... plus, who doesn't like corporate astroturfing. Except... by consumers... gren グレン 20:57, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
• Object as an owner of an iPod photo. Swirlix 13:53, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
• Object was a seperate model, should be kept seperate. The wizard 15:30, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
• Support the iPod Photo, was just called the iPod for 1 thing. Second, there aren't articles for the 1G, 2G, or 3G, so why is the 4G different? Jmclark911 21:05, 18 September 2006 (UTC)