Talk:Inverse

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Length and ease of use

This disambiguation page is too long and tedious to use. Any ideas or precedents for making it better? --Commander Keane 12:26, 1 May 2005 (UTC)

I am afraid it has got even longer, I merged in invert, inversion, and inverted. At least we now have everything together, I found it confusing to have such closely related terms separately.--Patrick 22:31, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

I object strenuously to this merger. The terms inversion and inverse in widely varying fields do not belong on the same page. I'm for re-establishing a page for the term inversion. Tmangray 17:41, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Inverse perspective?

There is nothing on inverse perspective at perspective (graphical). Might it be removed? --Zemyla^t 02:28, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] MOSDAB/Inverse

Could you explain what still needs to be cleaned up on Talk:Inverse? Just a short explanation would be good... as far as I can tell, it's formatted properly according to WP:MOSDAB, so it's not clear what work still needs to be done. --Interiot 21:34, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Oh, I think it's just still too hard to find anything e.g. the 2 categories I added, science and mathematics, may be a little weak. I'm sure there's a better way to arrange it -- I just don't know what it is. Also some entries may not really need to be here e.g. antonym, anitmatter; they might be examples of a kind of inversion, but does anyone call them that? And who would be coming to this page looking for Terminology of homosexuality#Other late 19th and early 20th century sexological terms? Ewlyahoocom 22:44, 14 May 2006 (UTC)