Talk:Intercrural sex

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Intercrural sex is part of WikiProject Sexuality, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Sexuality and Sex-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
Article Grading: The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

[edit] Image

What does the new image have to do with the topic? Is there any evidence that intercrural sex is meant to be inferred to be taking place? --Strait 23:53, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Misc

Is there any quantitative evidence that this is mainly a gay practice? Plenty of heteros do this, especially when one or both partners is sexually inexperienced.

I don't know that there is - I'm gonna change that. --Blackcats 10:03, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

---

User 68.117.211.92 - I think it's still important to include reasons as to why people might choose this form of sex as opposed to another. I'm going to add back in the part which you removed about that. If people still think it doesn't belong, then we can talk about it more here... --Blackcats 05:55, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I think you've made it all fit together well. The only problem I have is with the term "full" penetration, while I understand that for heterosexuals (obviously) femoral sex is a natural precursor to "full" penetrative vaginal sex, for men anal penetration isn't neccesarily an, I dunno, "inevitability" in the same way, the anatomy is just different. Its not the full or partial expression just two different expressions. So I'm removing the word full.

dry fuck? [1]