Talk:Insulated gate bipolar transistor
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It is not clear how it works, and what this N+ ares under the insulator are standing for?
A better explanation is required, such as down to level of PN barriers, what opens and what shuts when the device is open and when it is closed.
Otherwise, good work -- Mtodorov 69 13:59, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
- I agree this page deserve more. I plan to work on it, but if someone wants to do it before, please help yourself! Meanwhile, I've added the stub label... CyrilB 16:08, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
Isnt it somewhat redundant to call this page "IGBT Transistor" when the T stands for Transistor?
Contents |
[edit] Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was move to Insulated gate bipolar transistor.
- IGBT transistor → IGBT or Insulated gate bipolar transistor … Rationale: Redundant word: "Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor transistor". Precedents: MOSFET, JFET.
[edit] (Initial) Survey
- Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
- Support. - mako 08:46, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support or maybe move to Insulated gate bipolar transistor, with a redirect from IGBT and IGBT transistor ? - CyrilB 11:05, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support Insulated gate bipolar transistor with redirects. Blair 05:08, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
- Ambivalent -- Even though it's a blatant case of RAS syndrome, I think the trailing "Transistor" makes it a lot easier to figure out what the article is about. Otherwise, it's alphabet soup. Atlant 11:20, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Approval voting
[edit] IGBT
[edit] Insulated gate bipolar transistor
- mako 21:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Blair 05:09, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
- Atlant 22:17, 25 June 2006 (UTC) (If we're going to change the article name, this is what we should change it to.)
[edit] Discussion
- Add any additional comments
Moved. - mako 00:23, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
