Talk:Instance (World of Warcraft)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Instance use
I'm a little annoyed at the use of Instances being solely relegated to World of Warcraft, when they appear in other games such as City of Heroes. I'm not exactly sure what to do about it though, but I think that it should be made apparent that WoW isn't the only game that uses them.PratzStrike 11:25, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] LOST!
All of the instance articles have been removed! What's up with that?!
- Indeed it was voted they should be removed. I tend to agree with them, but some of the articles had content that was useful. A small number of the instances were actually quite important to Warcraft lore, particarlly Black Rock Spire... Im annoyed it got deleted. - UnlimitedAccess
[edit] Merge Battleground instance with Instance (World of Warcraft)
Neither is large enough to support their own article, and a Battleground is still an WoW Instance, what do you think? - UnlimitedAccess 03:46, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
-
- I agree. The Battleground instance article is pretty sparse ... it would probably be better to just do as you suggest and merge it into the main instance article. --Arabani 04:13, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
They could both be two seperate articles, but right now they are to small. We could merge them now, and then split them up when each become big enough. Havok (T/C) 09:01, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Level Ranges
These level ranges seem a bit optimistic.... Evercat 02:52, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
-
- I'm pretty sure they're the level ranges from the meeting stones placed by Blizzard for each instance. --Arabani 03:37, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
-
-
- You would be correct. Altair 18:48, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
-
[edit] Redirects
Why the hell does The Deeprun Tram redirect here? There's really no use, since TDT is NOT an instance. And let's say it was, why isn't it in the list? Byeee 19:47, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Useless Article
Wow, what a stupid article... Who cares about instances? This should be merged, transwiki'ed, and/or outright deleted... --Htmlism 13:16, 7 December 2006 (UTC)