User talk:Infrogmation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- This is the talk & discussion page for user Infrogmation
[edit] Archives
Old discussion moved to archives: User talk:Infrogmation/Archive Aug Nov 06, User talk:Infrogmation/Archive June July 06, User talk:Infrogmation/Archive March May 06, User talk:Infrogmation/Archive January February 06, User talk:Infrogmation/Archive October December 05, User talk:Infrogmation/Archive July September 05, User talk:Infrogmation/Archive May June 05, User talk:Infrogmation/Archive March April 05, User talk:Infrogmation/Archive Jan Feb 05, User talk:Infrogmation/Archive6 (November-December 2004), User talk:Infrogmation/Archive5 (September-October 2004), User talk:Infrogmation/Archive4 (May - August 2004); User talk:Infrogmation/Archive3 (January - April 2004); User talk:Infrogmation/Archive2 (August - December, 2003); and User talk:Infrogmation/Archive1 (oldest, October 2002 - July 2003).
Please add new disussion at the bottom of the page. Please sign comments.
[edit] Convert block to IP only?
User talk:LSK is requesting an unblock. He claims you blocked his school's proxy.[1] Perhaps you can change it to an IP only block? ---J.S (T/C) 18:20, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Changed to anon only block per request. -- Infrogmation 19:47, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Should I block sooner?
In the future...on cases such as that, should I block it sooner? Kukini 19:15, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, which case are you talking about? Thanks, -- Infrogmation 19:47, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- This one [2]. -Kukini 19:52, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, I figured it out just as you were posting this. Thanks. With User talk:Kdk1234 being used as a chat page irrelevent to Wikipedia, I think what we did was about appropriate for the circumstances -- warning the user first, then as the warning was ignored, the user was blocked. As they kept using the user page for irrelevent chat, I edit protected it. Cheers. -- Infrogmation 19:56, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks. Peace, Kukini 20:14, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, I figured it out just as you were posting this. Thanks. With User talk:Kdk1234 being used as a chat page irrelevent to Wikipedia, I think what we did was about appropriate for the circumstances -- warning the user first, then as the warning was ignored, the user was blocked. As they kept using the user page for irrelevent chat, I edit protected it. Cheers. -- Infrogmation 19:56, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- This one [2]. -Kukini 19:52, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Ryan O'Grady
Why did you delete the Ryan O'Grady articale i worked hard on that and please don,t give me a robot responce i can,t belive you did that i took me a long time.
- I replied on your talk page at User talk:Roberto-H. Also, please sign your talk page comments. Just add 4 tildes ~ and it adds your signature and the date automatically. Hope this helps, -- Infrogmation 00:20, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] School blocks
FYI: Instead of "School block AO", you can now use {{schoolblock}} instead. Cheers, Netsnipe ► 10:23, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Protection of Down syndrome
Thank you for protecting the article. On the off chance you end up taking some heat for this, good luck :) Fvasconcellos 20:51, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Salvador Dali
hi, not sure if this is the right way to do approach this or not, but on 1 December 2006 at 20:22, you reverted some additions i made to the political section on salvador dali. i don't have a user id on wikipedia but i have been making small contributions here and there. my edits were listed as by "24.80.185.127". i was wondering if you could take minute to explain a bit the criteria you used in deciding to revert the changes (i supplied some info i thought was relevant to the charges of anti-semitism, and i tried to cite it appropriately). i'm also willing to read general information about the topic of editing if you can point me to appropriate articles. thanks jess <anorak@lycos.com> —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.80.185.127 (talk) 02:42, 6 December 2006 (UTC).
[edit] more about wikilogo
[3] has your name on it in the history, thats why I assumed it was yours. who's is it? cchristian —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.34.103.184 (talk) 23:35, 9 December 2006 (UTC).
- My only contribution to Image:Wiki.png seems to have been to have reverted a vandal years ago. The earliest version is alas credited on that page to "Automated conversion", noting an image from earlier version of Wikipedia before mid 2002 from which attribution seems to have sometimes been lost. However the next edits as you can see on that page were by User:Stevertigo, so you might try asking them. You can also ask on Image talk:Wiki.png, the talk page for the image. Hope this helps, -- Infrogmation 04:47, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hi, hope this make my case clearer for diambig
On a google search [4], just about 90% of the pages for the National Rugby League, so I think that makes a good case for a redirect with a link to NRL (disambiguation). --Rugby 666 05:54, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Kim Won-yong edits
Hello, could you please give reasons for your substantial edits of Kim Won-yong. Thank you. Mumun 15:47, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- Sorry...confused by what had occurred. Thank you for making things more clearin Kim Won-yong intro. :-) Mumun 15:56, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] List of recordings preserved in the United States National Recording Registry
You are one of several people who was instrumental in cleaning up my List of recordings preserved in the United States National Recording Registry page. This page was the first page I created and still remains the page that I have made the most edits to on wikipedia (95 edits). Thank you for your assistance. Since this page received so much more cleanup assistance than most of my other pages I am wondering if it was a focus article of a WikiProject Group. Do you know of any such designation? It would be helpful because I will be self nominating for admin tomorrow or Tuesday. Please reply at my userpage with any info you may have. TonyTheTiger 17:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] www.Salvador-Dali.net
ArtsMode Network is a legal company sited in Figueres, just front the Salvador Dali Museum and Foundation.
The company was created in 1989 and we are the owners of various artworks of Salvador Dali, including “La Toile Daligram”, which is reproduced in the home page of www.Salvador-Dali.net. This web site is mainly dedicated to “Dali-News” and essays about Salvador Dali, in part created by people who works for ArtsMode, like “Els tres P Mesons” which articles you can see in “Wide articles and essays” (if you decide to visit it). This website is the result of years of hard work compiling information (written information) about the world of Salvador Dali, and we are very proud about it, enough to consider that it is a very useful tool for Wikipedia people really interested in Salvador Dali who wants or need to consult as much information as possible. In that way, we try to place a link to this information in Salvador Dali places, including Wikipedia.
Is one of the most visited web sites related with Salvador Dalí. Dali News and wide articles and essays have a wide collection of articles about Salvador Dalí, his life, Gala, Museums, Surrealism, etc.
Our web site was blacklisted by you, probably because we did not know well, when we placed at first the web site, how Wikipedia works, the rules and how to communicate with Administrators. And is still blocked.
The objective of www.Salvador-Dali.net is give information about Dali and his world, as you can verify, not spam.
Thanks for your comprehension,
Manuel Toro Arts & Mode Pujada del Castell 27 17600, Figueres, Girona, Spain Tel: (34) 972 51 45 71 Fax: (34) 972 51 45 72 e-mail: marketing@salvador-dali.net —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.48.228.12 (talk) 20:23, 11 December 2006 (UTC).