Talk:Indo-Pakistani wars and conflicts

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
More information about this article... ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Related task forces... Indian military history task force

Is it the consensus to refer to the supression of Bengalis prior to the '71 War as genocide? I wouldn't have thought that it merited that label but am not an expert. Eluchil404 20:34, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

I am not very happy with that particular sentence. It does not convey the meaning it is suppossed to convey. The war started as a last resort after the political situation in East Pakistan got out of control & the subsequent *genocide* that was carried out.. Perhaps the sentence needs to be reworded as ".. the dispute between the 2 nations started out after Pakistan made a heavy-handed crackdown on the supporters of autonomy in East-Pakistan. East Pakistan became a free sovereign country Bangladesh as a result of this war --Rev.bayes 23:27, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Contents 1 Pro-Indian Bias 2 Pro-Indian Bias 3 The facts are: 4 Bias 5 No action so far to balance this page 6 Has any Pakistani been charged for genocide?

[edit] Pro-Indian Bias

This article is not based on facts. There is a need to balance this article.

[edit] Pro-Indian Bias

This article is not based on facts. There is a need to balance this article.

Here is an example:

"The Second Kashmir War again involved the issue of Kashmir with Pakistan infiltrating and starting a rebellion in Jammu and Kashmir" Maakhter 04:15, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The facts are:

Pakistan did indeed try to incite riots in Jammu and Kashmir then they attacked it putting India on the defensive but due to politics in the military the attack was delayed resulting in the defeat of the Pakistanis or at least thats what i took from the section on operation Grand Slam

[edit] Bias

I could not see a reason to flag this article as biased.

Although I am no expert on this subject, in casual reading I could see no bias and was not drawn to ither side of the argument that the article outlined. I am sure that those who have added comments about this bias, will be able to correct these errors if they see fit, however, this article seems to be reporting the facts of the war- obviously wars are had to report on, the sources of information are mainly biased in favour of the source's origin.

---

[edit] No action so far to balance this page

This page looks like a propaganda tool of Government of India. A serious effort should be made to fix this page.

[edit] Has any Pakistani been charged for genocide?

Has any Pakistani been charged for genocide? What about the current relations between Pakistan and Bangladesh? The relations between Pakistan and Bangladesh are very friendly. If someone accuses Pakistan for genocide then why Bangladesh is so friendly with Pakistan, while no one has charged any Pakistani for genocide.

Has Bangladesh given up its allegation of genocide against Pakistan? If not then, why they are so friendly with Pakistan? Why Bangladesh does not want to chase its allegations of genocide against Pakistan?

The reason is that there was no genocide. It is Indian propaganda.