User talk:ImpuMozhi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
ImpuMozhi is taking a long wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia eventually. Please e-mail him for anything urgent |
 Archives |
|---|
 Home |
 Talk |
 Message me |
 Gallery |
|---|
Contents |
[edit] Hey!!
hey hey hey!!! Look who's back! I was really wondering which remote part you have gone and hidden yourself.. So welcome back (look how tables turn, just the other day I was the newbie learning the tricks from you and now I am welcoming you:) and well thanks so much for the barnstar as well as your support to my RFA... Hope you'll stick around now -- Lost(talk) 03:44, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
- Glad to see you back, Impu. Please continue editing however low frequency it may be. -- Sundar \talk \contribs 05:44, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Looks good
As best as I could tell, the gallery looks good now. Thanks for fixing it. I changed the external links into internal ones just so it looks nicer for you too. Kevin_b_er 16:11, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you for your support!
 23:42, 7 November 2006 (UTC) |
If I'm a bit pale in the face now, And if in the future |
[edit] Thanks ImpuMozhi
Took me a while to get back to you for various reasons. Yes indeed I am still here! I also had a small break from wikipedia a few months back, it has been a real hectic year. Anyhow, ImpuMozhi if you remember it was your yourself who have kindly invited me to register in the first place. I have learnt so much from wikipedia (and being part of it) and all that is thanks to you. As for the photos, well many of them were actually already in wikipedia, such as the Jaivana's photo, which was already there in the Cannon article. Nevertheless, thankyou so much for the Barn Star, It felt nice as well when I saw it, thanks again!
Apart from that I'm quite surprised to learn from you about the relatively small number of people interested in Indian history, out of all the people in India that could speak English and have access to the Internet.. Another reason, which kept me in wikipedia is because of how disgusted I am of the continuous attempts to distort and simplify Asian history. Lastly, thanks for your wish with regards to the case, wouldn't say that trip was particularly happy due to the situation. In the past centuries, these internal family conflicts would have been much worse, as a historian yourself, I'm sure you can imagine. Nevertheless I have my own objectives in life (fortunately) which is to be an instigator of rural development and historic-conservation in Rajasthan, so these courtcases are just an unfortunate part of life that has to be dealt with.
Lastly, things would be much better though if I could reconcile with my grandma as soon as possible, after all it was not her fault, and she is the only grandparent I ever really got to know (as my Thai-grandfather passed away when I was 9).Devraj Singh 04:39, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Request
Hi,
Can you please have a look at this article. I think the title is written wrongly. There should be halant at the end of both words. Just wanted to confirm from someone who understands the script better. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 05:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Did you know
 |
On 27 November 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Rajendrasinhji Jadeja, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
--GeeJo (t)⁄(c) • 21:08, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Ranganathaswamy Temple
I see that you moved this article. I do not object. However, some editors believe that when a name refers to one subject far more often than to others, that a simple search for that name should bring up the most commonly expected subject. In the case of Ranganathaswamy Temple, I think by far the most expected subject would be the temple at Srirangam, which is the largest temple in India, and also the largest temple currently used as a Hindu temple. I am only sharing this for your reference so that you will be aware of the issue. Sincerely, --BostonMA talk 20:21, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you
Thank you for your comments on Talk:Carnatic music. You have reflected my stand in this dipute quite succintly. All I'm trying to bring is a neutral point of view to the article. A couple of users are unwilling to listen to reason. Any help from you to find a compromise will greatly help. Thanks Parthi talk/contribs 00:23, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
