Talk:Impossible cube

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Okay, we seem to have a revert war going on here, and I for one can't understand why. The two images keep getting put into reverse order, then fixed, then reversed again. This is silly.

Remember, both of the images float to the right, so the first image in the wikicode ends up the furthest to the right: following the other if you read left-to-right (as most English speakers do). So we end up with "Viewed from another angle, however, the non-impossibility of the shape is apparent -- its cubic nature itself is an illusion. Viewed from a certain angle, this cube appears to defy the laws of physics." which reverses the logical order of the sentences. It makes no sense to have the image revealing the illusion from another angle before the image of the illusion we're describing itself. — Gwalla | Talk 05:43, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

In my browser, the two images appear one on top of the other, no matter how wide I make the page; and the present state (with "impossible_cube_illusion_angle" first) is the one which puts the pictures in the correct order. (I absolutely agree that the image of the illusion must appear first - whatever that means - in the rendered page.) Zack 07:49, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Two kinds of impossible cube?

I think the impossible cube in the Image:Impossible_cube_illusion_angle.png is not the same type as the one used by Escher in [1] and which I have seen most often (and which I personally prefer). The current image has two "wrong" intersections, whereas Escher's version has only one. Here's a modified version of the figure with only one intersection wrong. Itub 19:42, 5 June 2006 (UTC)