Talk:Impossible Princess

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Impossible Princess article.
Please sign and date your posts using four tildes (~~~~). New discussion topics go at the bottom of the page; click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Frequently asked questions. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Talk page guidelines Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Don't bite the newcomers!

Impossible Princess has been listed as a good article under the good-article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a review.

Impossible Princess has had a peer review by Wikipedia editors which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

The following users are active in maintaining and improving this article. If you have questions regarding verification and sources, they may be able to help: Underneath-it-All (talk • contribs)

[edit] Good Article nomination has failed

The Good article nomination for Impossible Princess has failed, for the following reason:

While the referencing is decent where used, sources outside Minogue's own website should be found. Also, the "Singles" and "Cover Artwork" sections are wholly unsourced as are large parts of "Making of the record". Finally, more as a style point than a GA requirement, the Release details section could use a serious re-tooling as it looks very strange right now. Staxringold 14:52, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

I have addressed the issues with references and reformatted the "release details" section, placing them into a table. I have now renomianted the article.Underneath-it-All 16:16, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

I've approved it as a Good Article. Congrats! Briancua 13:22, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sales totals

Please do not change sales totals unless you can source you claims. Thanks. -- Underneath-it-All 15:24, 13 July 2006 (UTC)