User talk:Ike9898

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Talk page archive 1

Contents

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:WAVES recruitment poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:WAVES recruitment poster.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:06, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Se7en Edit

Your Tag, here, can not happen until the article is confirmed by the GA team. It has since been removed until this happens. -- Shane (talk/contrib) 04:31, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

I don't understand what you mean. This article has achieved GA status; I evaluated it and promoted it. That's why I changed the tag you reverted! ike9898 12:59, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Ah. Like amiss save. No problem.  :) I just saw the counter of GA articles go and I went to check and I still saw GA nominee. Cool that another film article made it to FA status. :) -- Shane (talk/contrib) 17:53, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hydrogen is the science collaboration for August 2006

Okay guys, now let's make this an FA!

As a regular contributor to Science Collaboration of the Month, we thought you might like to know that the current collaboration is Gene.
You are receiving this message because your username is listed on our list of regulars. To stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name!

Samsara (talk • contribs) 08:37, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] COTW Project

You voted for Textile, this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. Davodd 02:05, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Word search

Have a look at the word search article you started. It's fleshed out quite nicely. Fwend 08:13, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] SCOTM

As a regular contributor to Science Collaboration of the Month, we thought you might like to know that the current collaboration is Gene.
You are receiving this message because your username is listed on our list of regulars. To stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name!

NCurse work 06:00, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Science Collaboration of the month

As a regular contributor to Science Collaboration of the Month, we thought you might like to know that the current collaboration is Gene.
You are receiving this message because your username is listed on our list of regulars. To stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name!

NCurse work 06:39, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Science Collaboration of the month

As a regular contributor to Science Collaboration of the Month, we thought you might like to know that the current collaboration is Gene.
You are receiving this message because your username is listed on our list of regulars. To stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name!

NCurse work 07:48, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Philly meetup

Hi! There will be a Wikipedia Meetup in Philadelphia on 4 November. If you're interested in coming, RSVP by editing Wikipedia:Meetup/Philadelphia 2 to reflect the likelihood of your being able to attend. If you have any questions, feel free to ask my talk page. Hopefully, we'll all see you (and each other) on the 4th! --evrik 16:06, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Barnstar moved to user page. I apperciate it! ike9898 15:06, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Want to get involved in food science and technology stuff?

I have been working on food science and technology issues over the last month, including the Institute of Food Technologists, International Union of Food Science and Technology, and other food related stuff. Would you be interested in assisting? Chris 17:02, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Right now, I would like for you to review all articles on food science starting with the main article and make any necessary edits to them. I am under editorial review right now, and one of the things that I have noticed is I tend to do these things individually more than collaboratively. You can use the template that I have created to go through the different articles. Chris 19:08, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Science Collaboration of the month

You voted for Gene and this article is now the current Science Collaboration of the Month!
Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia science article.

NCurse work 17:11, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sex is now the COTF

 You showed support for Sex at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Core topics/Core topics COTF. This article was selected as our collaboration of the fortnight. Hope you can help.

Walkerma 06:36, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Driving away editors

I saw your message on Raul654's talk page. Another thing that is driving editors away is a purge on images that don't comply with Wikipedia's GNU policies. The purgers are showing little judgment at all--if it's not GNU, it's gone. They don't seem to understand the reality that the world is full of images that are INTENDED to be widely reproduced by fair use. Pictures of celebrities are a common case in point -- no celebrity is ever going to release all rights to a picture; instead, they provide publicity pictures that can be widely reproduced under fair use. The purge is just one more reason not to bother with Wikipedia, IMHO. Another is very stupid editors who like to argue with non-stupid ones.

(And BTW, I never met an offal expert before.)

(And further BTW, there's something wrong with the links in the green area of your user page. I click one subject and get another.) Lou Sander 04:41, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Science Desk "Odd Nausea" meta comments

(copied from the discussion page for Reference Desk) I removed the following metacomments today from the aforementioned ref desk page because they are talking about a responder rather than answering the original question:Edison 17:18, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

  • "::Hey Ten - If you don't have anything concrete to add, why write anything at all? ike9898 18:54, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, Ten. Just say 'Go to a Doctor, it sounds serious'. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.10.127.58 (talk) 19:27, 8 December 2006 (UTC).
I think that was a little bit unnecessary yourself ike. His reply was fine. X [Mac Davis] (DESK|How's my driving?) 05:52, 9 December 2006 (UTC)"
I did this per the rule someone stated that comments about comments should be on this page or on the editor's talk page, not on the public side of the reference desk. If Ike, Hagermanbot and Mac Davis feel strongly that they are an answer to the original question, and if the consensus on this page agrees, then I apologize and they can certainly be moved back. Edison 17:18, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Monell Chemical Senses Center

Hello,

Thank you for your stub submission. You may wish to note that it is preferable to use a stub template from Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types instead of using simply {{stub}}, if you can.

Thanks! --Vox Causa 01:12, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

I offer my apologies. as I was tired, I simply read, "institute" and decided with school, and then misspelled it. What I can not figure out is why I did not preview it, as I always preview my edits, especially in stub-sorting. Thanks for calling this to my attention, and I will try to eliminate my mistakes in the future. The article has been re-sorted to {{med-org-stub}} which is more appropriate. thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!--Vox Causa 20:02, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
It is quite alright, think nothing of it. Well all can be grumpy at times, and I don't blame you for being a bit perturbed when I issued advice on stub sorting when I myself messed it up.--Vox Causa 23:12, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Since you disagree with the previous tag, would you agree to {{Neuroscience-stub}}, or simply a general {{med-stub}}? If you disagree, please explain.--Vox Causa 23:42, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for being so reasonable, I knew we could come to a decision. Just to allow for a broader sense of the article, I will add a double-stub, for neuroscience, then medicine.--Vox Causa 01:47, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../i/k/e/User_talk%7EIke9898_b873.html"