User talk:Ihcoyc

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Older discussions are now at:

Contents

[edit] Quincunx

Just thought I'd let you know that I've replaced your Quincunx.png with an SVG, Quincunx.svg. —Wereon 21:56, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] DYK

Updated DYK query Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Margaret Brundage, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Gurubrahma 00:09, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] More help retrieving code

Thank you for helping me retrieve the code for userbox Template:User Catholic Evangelical. It was helpful. I presume by your ability to help that you are an admin (though I can't find that claim on your userpage). If you can, would you please help me retrieve the code for Template:User Reformed Baptist. The major thing I lack in recreating it on my userpage are the colors, and size of text. Thanks.
 IS Guðsþegn – UTCE – 23:59, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Oldest language

Thanks for your great work on this article—you are the man. You might want to formally change your original vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oldest Language, just in case the closing admin isn't sharp-eyed enough to notice that you changed your mind. rodii 15:55, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Help with Latin and Law

You look pretty busy already, but I was wondering if you'd lend a hand to the Lex Papia Poppaea article. There are a lot of Latin and legal terms that need to be clarified for the average user. I've done some cleanup on it, but I'm heistant to do much more. Thanks! --Kerowyn 02:27, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for addition to magic ring

Thanks for adding Plato's fable/folk-tale about the Ring of Gyges to the magic ring article. Tom Lougheed 02:56, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re:Turkish literature peer review

Hello. I've noticed that you have an interest in literature, and that is why I am leaving you a message. I have recently entirely rewritten the Turkish literature article with a view to getting it up to Featured Article status, and have placed the article up for peer review. If you could possibly take the time to look at and review the article, I would greatly appreciate it. If not, thank you for taking the time to read this message. Saposcat 09:55, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] real punk

Hello, I have noticed you use the punk-fan userbox. You may be also interested using {{user realpunk}}, which look like this:

This user appreciates real punk music and can't stand pop "punk".




If you want to comment me, use my talk page please. psychomelo(discussion) 20:58, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:EmileNelligan.JPG

I have deleted Image:EmileNelligan.JPG, from which you removed the no source tag without specifying a source. I'm sure you meant well, but I'd like to point out that a drawing does not necessarily have to have been made during the lifetime of its subject, so there's no way to know the copyright status of that image without knowing its source. We require a source for all images, regardless of copyright status. As it happens, that image was uploaded by indefinitely blocked user JillandJack, who is a reincarnation of User:DW, a user hard-banned multiple times under different usernames (see those two user pages for details). I encourage you to find a proper illustration for Émile Nelligan, but it will be better for the article itself if the image doesn't have that username attached to it. Thanks. Chick Bowen 21:43, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

I'm not accusing your actions at all, I'm just defending mine--I was actually encouraged to delete everything JillandJack uploaded, on the grounds that this person had already been banned before that account was created. The ideal situation is for a new image to be uploaded, and I'm very glad you're planning to do so. Thanks. Chick Bowen 15:25, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Natalie Barney's hat

I have a .jpg of a painting, "Natalie in Fur Cape", 1905 by Alice Pike Barney, in which she is wearing a similarly ludicrous hat, but is slightly happier. It might make a nice addition to the article, but I'm not sure: is a 1905 painting pretty clearly in the public domain? If so, I could upload it and you could see if you like it. I also have a rather nice, though faded, photo (.gif) of her in her older days, in no hat and looking rather impish in an embroidered robe, but I suspect that the copyright on that is still valid. - Nunh-huh 23:29, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Here she is then: Image:Natalie_Barney_in_Fur_Cape.jpg. Please add it to the article if you think it's worthwhile! -Nunh-huh 00:22, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mohammed's sexual orientation

Can you or I remove the deleted page tag? I say this for a few reasons... it was never recreated so I don't see a need for it having that... there is also no consensus that an article about Muhammad's sexual orientation can't be created... granted I think it's a subject that might be impossible to do well and neutrally... but, there's no real consensus that we can ban its recreation... there may be some scholarly discussion of it that I am not privvy to. My point is... we should see what happens since it's not simple vandalism... if it becomes a problem page then we can protect it and put that template. Thanks. gren グレン 08:09, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Looking at the deletion log my deletion is the only one listed... is there a reason that others would be omitted? Well, in either case I don't suppose it's a big deal. gren グレン 19:14, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Request for mediation

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Roman Catholic Church, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.

[edit] Invitation

The Mediation Cabal

You are a disputant in a case listed under Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases. We invite you to be a mediator in a different case. Please read How do I get a mediator assigned to my case? for more information.
~~~~

--Fasten 13:08, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Your lovely comments

Ihcoyc, thanks for your lovely comments at the mediation page. The controversy has preceded me and will outlast me. You know why? Because there's something objectively wrong with the title. I'm not the only one who recognizes that. I've been making my case based on the naming conventions and the objective criteria that they set out. You, on the other hand, are blatantly appealing to a "moral right" to the name "Catholic Church" -- and that type of subjective argumentation is out of bounds in a naming conflict. I didn't make the rules, but if we follow them for Church of Christ, there is no reason not to follow them for Catholic Church -- because the most common usage of that term, "Catholic Church", refers to that Church of which the Pope is head.

I am amused by your conspiracy theory and your unwillingness to assume good faith on the part of Catholics. I am a papist, and I will always be one. There is no reason for us to run away from the idea of the Pope; we love the successor of Peter and the Vicar of Christ on earth. The whole idea of being Catholic is that you are in communion with the Pope. If you want to create an article called papist Church or papal Church or popery or popish Church, and redirect it to Catholic Church, that is more than fine by me.

But the simple, objective facts of the matter are:

  1. the most common usage of the term "Catholic Church" refers to that Church of which the Pope is head.
  2. the most common way to refer to that Church of which the Pope is head is to say, "Catholic Church".
  3. the Church of which the Pope is head claims that very title ("Catholic Church") for itself.
  4. the title "Roman Catholic Church" is inaccurate insofar as it refers to a distinct particular Church within the universal Catholic Church, not the worldwide and visible Catholic Church of which the Pope is head. Not all Catholics in union with the Pope are "Roman" Catholics!
  5. we've dealt with these possible "ambiguities" before, and we settled them the exact way I am asking us to settle them. (Cf. Church of Christ, United Church of Christ, Church of Christ (disambiguation), International Churches of Christ, etc.)

We have every reason to move Roman Catholic Church to Catholic Church. If you are unwilling to play by the same rules for the Catholics as applied to every other religious group's article, then it is you with the massive POV problem, not me. --Hyphen5 15:29, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

urk... as a Catholic convert, I thought the big thrill was that we were in communion with Jesus, not the Pope. --Bluejay Young 16:24, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Translation of meta:Rodovid.org

Hi there, I find your user page using Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Translators. I am working on the project proposal meta:Rodovid.org and want to have it translated into as many languages as posible. If you could help with translation, add your name to meta:Rodovid.org/translation and please, go ahead, translate the page. I would greatly appreciate your help.--Bjwebb (talk) 14:49, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nice work!

The Epic Barnstar
I hereby award you this Epic Barnstar for your brilliant work on Latin profanity. —Keenan Pepper 02:01, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
Yes, that's an excellent one! Thank you for writing it (and for compiling your favourit quotes ;-)! Mstroeck 22:59, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] PIE project

Hi, thinks for your kind words. Glad you liked the Ablaut article. Question, would you be interested in a bigger project on PIE? Go to Talk:List of Indo-European roots#Project proposal and if you are interested, stick your oar into the discussion going on there. --Doric Loon 10:53, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your Indonesian question

Did you ever find an answer to your Indonesian question, i.e.:

When Bahasa Indonesia was made from Malay, was there any attempt made to reduce the levels of social coding, politeness levels, and respectful/deferential/colloquial/abrupt forms that were present in the language originally? -- Smerdis of Tlön 14:30, 7 Oct 2003 (UTC)

If so, it would be worth putting the answer to this in the article.

btw, love your Favourite quotes from the Wikipedia --Singkong2005 15:05, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Just returning your greeting

Thanks for taking time to post to my talk page, and for noticing my work. I will be messing around in the folklore and blues music categories primarily, with forays into country music and herbology, no doubt. I hope our paths cross again; i much admire you work here. Catherineyronwode 04:24, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] List of shock sites

Someone has put this up for deletion yet again. Care to cast your vote? Skinmeister 10:36, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Saints Wikiproject

I noted that you have been contributing to articles about saints. I invite you to join the WikiProject Saints. You can sign up on the page and add the following userbox to your user page.

This user is a member of the Saints WikiProject.


I also invite you to join the discussion on prayers and infoboxes here: Prayers_are_NPOV.

Thanks! --evrik 17:48, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Weather lore

Hello.

When this article was first nominated for Featured Article status, you very kindly supported it. It is now up for Removal of FA status. I wuold very much hope you would help to defeat this nomination by taking part in the discussion here. Thanks. Denni ☯ 18:42, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Care to put your 2c in?

They're discussing whether or not to delete the userbox for Asperger's. --Bluejay Young 22:01, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Myriad year clock

Hi Ihcoyc. The description in the Myriad year clock indeed fits closely the characteristics of the clock on the photograph. Also, I do not know of another clock in the Tokyo Science Museum that would fit the description, so I guess this is indeed the same clock. Regards. PHG 22:02, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Portal:Folklore

Your proposal to create a Portal:Folklore has been accepted. To create the portal, please see Wikipedia:Portal/Instructions.--cj | talk 05:03, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Folklore Portal

Thanks for starting the Folklore Portal. :) --Fang Aili 說嗎? 17:35, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

I also want to congratulate you on the folklore portal. It slipped in without my noticing. I have been compiling a list of folklore stubs and articles to be written up, and will be actually organizing some folklorists to work on this project and develop a wiki project:folklore next week. (We'll be meeting to discuss this in Milwaukee, which I see is far from your corner of Indiana, but you can join us when we meet in Louisville in 2 years.) E-mail me directly for more information. One thing I am interested in doing is tagging some articles as folklore stubs. I proposed this months ago, and never got a formal yea or nay, but I think now is the time to go ahead and make that list. I just don't know how to do the folklore-stub template. In any case, all these articles can be added to the portal. I didn't even know about portals, frankly, though I've been on Wikipedia over a year. Hopefully we can organize a project and bring these articles up to shape. As you know, there's a lot of bad information out there about folklore, so hopefully we can add to it. Thanks and keep in touch. Bruxism 01:36, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Latin help

Hi, you added a bunch of references to the Latin article a few months ago, but could you, if possible, put them into the article as inline citations instead of at the end of the article? If you can't, that's cool, but if you could add a sentence here or there using those books and then cite them with <ref> tags, that would make the article look a lot more official. Thanks J. Finkelstein

[edit] Note

Image:Hogarth-rake.jpg will probably be deleted as a dupe of a colored version. 68.39.174.238 05:49, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Margaret-antioch.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Margaret-antioch.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:42, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pole (object)

I like what you are doing to the page to attempt to preserve it. The real question is "would it not be better merged with Pole and that page improved?" Fiddle Faddle 14:03, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] License and poem

Looks like you're correct on that. No worries. --Improv 18:53, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Long talk page

Greetings! Your talk page is getting a bit long in the tooth - please consider archiving your talk page (or ask me and I'll archive it for you). Cheers! BD2412 T 23:55, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] George Smith

Hello and good day to you, American Computer Steve. A sincere thankyou for your vote to keep George Toogood Smith. With regards to your comment, I am increasingly interested in expanding this article and as soon as this gorgeous weather goes away I will dig out some books and get researching. In the meantime I wonder do you have any knowlege/interest in the subject and could you perhaps help yourself? Thankyou kindly and have a very nice day. No more tennis for me. Lah dee dah.--Crestville 14:49, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sic Semper Sockdologizers

Hey, I notice you entered the bit about sockdolager being a deformation of sockdologer [1]. I've seen a number of definitions and etymologies of the word -- can you tell me where you found yours? (I know, you did this a long time ago, hope this isn't a pain, but I'm very curious about this word.) IronDuke 02:12, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Yes, I want to hear this too. --Bluejay Young 08:26, 26 July 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Couthutlaugh

Hi! I came across the word couthutlaugh in Outlaw and was intrigued enough to Google it -- finding precisely zero references (that were not copies of the Wikipedia article). Assuming it was completely spurious, I boldly removed it (with a request that a citation be given if it is readded); upon further investigation, however, I discovered that the word was referred to in the article as you originally wrote it. That changed matters; obviously you would not have introduced a spurious word intentionally. I therefore checked my OED and found an entry (with the spelling couthutlaughe). Now, the term, while real, is clearly exceedingly obscure -- it is apparently almost entirely confined to legal dictionaries. I feel that, if it is to stand in the outlaw article, it should be marked as such (and appropriately cited); what do you think? Kiscica 23:40, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Hi again -- See Talk:Outlaw where I quote the OED entry... Kiscica 23:40, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thou

Thou is up for a featured article review. Detailed concerns may be found here. Please leave your comments and help us address and maintain this article's featured quality. Sandy 14:09, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vulgar Latin

I'd like to thank you for your interesting article and let you know that I've just translated it into French (fr:Latin Vulgaire). On the behalf of fr, let me tell you that I appreciate the time it took you to write it. I must say that it was extremely tedious to translate, because I don't know much about linguistics termoniology in French (this website was a major help). Well, do keep up the good work. You've made some very important contributions to Wikipedia. --Zantastik talk 03:25, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Award time

The Original Barnstar
Awarded to Ihcoyc for thinking outside the box. - CrazyRussian talk/email 17:01, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Anarcho-monarchism

In your "official capacity as Lord High Parliamentian of the Royal Anarchist Pan-African Christian Party for White Islamic European Socialist Independence in Latin America", you must be very busy indeed, what with having so many followers.

Thanks for taking the time out from your official duties to make me laugh :) --BrownHairedGirl 18:59, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

  • I will keep in mind from now on that I am in the company of such esteemed [2] officer. How to address you? CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 19:54, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thanks for the help on magical mottoes. I kind of dont want to do that much (just in case it gets deleted), as this sort of thing takes time. I just dont want my time to be wasted is all. I've got alot more names to add though, so..thanks again. :) SynergeticMaggot 15:48, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Nevermind, I guess we are making the list rise! I awarded you a barnstar for translating. Many thanks. SynergeticMaggot 16:15, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright Information Permission for Rossetti's The Holy Grail Image

From: Geoffrey McDonald" <geoffreymcdonald@hotmail.com>

> Can you help? > > I am trying to source the current owner and location of Dante Gabriel > Rossetti's painting "The Holy Grail" you have listed on your encyclopedia, last uploaded 17:01, 20 June 2003..Ihoyc. > > I am seeking permission to use it on a book cover. > > I have read the copyright information and the Public Domain literature. >It says the image is Public Domain. > However, I would like to source the current owner to see if they have any copyright rights and to confirm that it is indeed Public Domain and can therefore be used on a book cover. > > I emailed Wikipedia, who were very helpful and told me to contact the uploader:

"Our image was uploaded back in 2003; you can contact the uploader to ask where he got it from, but three years down the line it's possible he's forgotten. Try leaving him a note at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ihcoyc and asking him to leave a reply there.

In 1874, Rossetti painted an oil version - similar in concept, but changing the pose, and with a more advanced style. This is the one we have the picture of - http://www.rossettiarchive.org/docs/s91.r-1.rap.html

Per that page, it's currently held privately by Lord Andrew Lloyd-Webber; I'm afraid I have no idea how you'd go about contacting him to enquire about the rights, though."

Can the person who uploaded the Holy Grail image in 2003 please name their source so I can see if I need to ask for permission to use this image for a book cover?


You help in this matter would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks.

Geoffrey.

I uploaded the Holy Grail image several years ago to Wikipedia. The site the file is from was noted on the upload page:
http://www.rossettiarchive.org/docs/s91.r-1.rap.html
The file I put on Wikipedia is basically the same image, brightened and made somewhat smaller.
At least in the USA, the file is public domain. My understanding is that the artist died sometime in the 1880s. Even the longest copyright periods (100 years after the death of the creator) would put that file firmly in the public domain. In the USA, at any rate, it shouldn't be necessary to seek the permission of the owner of the original to use the image, because nobody has a right to exclude anyone else from using the image any more. I don't know about the law of other jurisdictions, which may be quaint and curious and full of ironic twists.
I have absolutely no idea how you'd get in touch with Andrew Lloyd Webber. His agent or publicist might be a start. Don't know who they are either. - Smerdis of Tlön 13:40, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Darts

Thanks very much, and...everybody else who came round to play lawn darts is still here...Mohoho. Yomangani 22:48, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Odiambo Siangla

Hi. You may want to comment on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Odhiambo Siangla. Nesbit 17:00, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Haruspex.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Haruspex.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:19, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vulgar Latin

Vulgar Latin is up for a featured article review. Detailed concerns may be found here. Please leave your comments and help us address and maintain this article's featured quality. Sandy 20:34, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jahbulon

You participated in the discussion last time. Please participate in the discussion this time. Uncle G 00:10, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] DYK

Updated DYK query On 18 August 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article gasoline pill, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

[edit] Movies

I didn't read the complete article, my i can suggest the following two SF-movies. They where both produced around 1980 and relay an alternative social future, if you take out the killing, action etc. With is alike the (super) high modernism:

Alien (1979), Blade Runner (1982), Ridley Scott a director And perhaps The Fifth Element

If you look at the way the characters in the movie are housed, for instance. This better seen in the second Alien movie. --Grim Reaper2 12:28, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kurdish celebration of Newroz

Based on skimming both articles, the Kurdish version of the holiday seems significant enough to warrant a separate article. The article is referenced, albeit mostly with external links that probably ought to be turned into endnotes. Were the Kurdish section merged, it would either dominate the head article, or information would be lost. Per WP:BIAS, if we have separate articles on ethnic Winter Solstice observations, we can have separate articles on ethnic Vernal Equinox observations also. - Smerdis of Tlön 14:04, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
From Kurdish celebration of Newroz
I just want to clarify my reasonings. Bear with me.
Firstly, I am not proposing the information to be lost. Just seperated.
The holiday Newroz had been celebrated for forever (according to article). Kurds just like rest of the local peoples had been celebrating this and still do. Any diagreements with this?
I think it is biased to suggest the political rallys are a part of kurdish culture which wouldt come with the assumption that every Kurd supports the PKK (these "political rallys" often end up bing a PKK suprot rally orhganised by certain Kurdish political parties). Any diagreements with this?
The Newroz celebrations are hardly unique to the kurds (as per Norouz) and the politics stuff is hardly uneque to the spring holiday (such incidents happen on other social gatherings such as on the workers day and etc). That is why an article explaining the political aspect should be kept diferent. Any diagreements with this?
So, all I am proposing is spliting political stuff and holiday stuff.
--Cat out 17:03, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Just a brief response. When a page is on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, what is at issue is whether the page is so worthless as to be unworthy of an encyclopedia, and ought to be entirely removed. Vanity pages, crank theories, confused gibberish, and deliberate vandalism are the chief offenders.
Your concerns about what should be at the head page of Norouz and what should be at this one don't fit any of the usual categories. This is the sort of thing that customarily is addressed at one or the other articles' talk pages. Likewise, if the page is wrong about the extent or significance of the politicization of the holiday among Kurds, this too is something that belongs on the talk page; flag it for neutrality and accuracy if need be.
I have no opinion on any of these issues, and no real basis to form one. I read the article on Kurdish celebrations, and it seemed to make sense and contain information that, if accurate, should be kept somewhere. And similarly, since it contained information about songs associated with the celebration by Kurds, it seemed to have enough independent data to no longer qualify as a POV fork, even if it once did.
- Smerdis of Tlön 20:13, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
No, afd is a concensus gathering process. I am NOT trying to get anything deleted,<just tying to reorganize the mess. See talk page of Kurdistan why talk pages are practıcaly useless (constant endless rants). The idea is to talk the opponent to death (forumer logic) I believe.
I really feel article should be topic spesific rather than ethnicity spesific. History can be its main article for instance. Political stuff should go to an article about political stuff rather than about the spring holiday.
Perhaps you can change your vote from keep to move/rename etc?
--Cat out 22:56, 18 August 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Great userpage

Seriously, this is the best userpage I have seen on wikipedia. It suggests you have read and contributed to many interesting articles -- I should like to know the best ones! Hey, maybe I can buy a few beers and you, I, and Schopenhauer can have a real party! Good work! Rintrah 22:46, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Amafanius

Hi, Excellent rewrite - well done! Dlyons493 Talk 20:47, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

  • I agree. Impressive work. Dina 22:33, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Infinite nesting

Thanks for your delightful comment on the "infinite nesting" AfD...I was considering writing something similar myself, but thought better of it lest it become troll-food; nulla salus extra ecclesiam and all that, what. Byrgenwulf 14:40, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject: Historical information

WikiProject: Historical information is better organized than when you saw it last (as Wikipedia:Historical information). Would you care to join it?—msh210℠ 22:00, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Latin translation

I note you're fairly conversant in Latin, so I was wondering if you could translate a city motto for me so that I could include it in an infobox: Per Ardva Ad Summum Bonum Civilium. Thanks. └ OzLawyer / talk ┐ 14:03, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Sure - that's "Through Struggles to the Greatest Good of the Citizens" (or, "the greatest civic good"). It's a fairly obvious play on the traditional tag per ardua ad astra, "through struggles to the stars." - Smerdis of Tlön 14:46, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks. I found the air force motto and tried to "translate" the motto myself (I know virtually nothing of Latin, although I wish I did—it's very interesting), coming up with something somewhat similar, although not quite right: "through struggle to the best society". I think I'll go with "greatest civic good". Again, thanks. └ OzLawyer / talk ┐ 14:54, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Business Process Management

I understand your concern for the page having buzzwords, however, it would also be great if you could start some discussion on the talk page about how to fix it. Cheers, Ansell 01:04, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

The same goes for your concern regarding the article on business processes. I have rewritten the article almost completely and I am proposing that you remove the buzzword tag you set. Hur bra är din svenska egentligen? Hälsningar, --Kai a simon 08:30, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Irish phonology peer review

Hi, over two years ago you left this message at Talk:Irish phonology. Well, the article has grown rather a lot from then and is now up for peer review. If you'd like to, please take a look at the current version and then leave comments at Wikipedia:Peer review/Irish phonology. Thanks! —Angr 11:59, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Beautiful languages DRV

Howdy, You suggested that I speedy deleted the above because it was "inherently POV" (you then comment that you were unaware whether that was a CSD). That's simply inaccurate, please review the deletion log. It was removed under WP:CSD A1, as described in the deletion summary. Please excercise better care in the future. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 21:01, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Also, please sign your posts to talk pages with ~~~~. It makes it easier to stay abreast of conversations and to know who's talking. Thanks! - CHAIRBOY (☎) 21:02, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Latin Question

Hi. You seem to be an authority on Latin, so you seem the right person to ask. In Latin poetry, are the words chosen so the verses follow the determined sequence of long and short syllables, or are the words pronounced contrary to their usual pronunciation, if necessary, in accordance with the metre? Thanks. Rintrah 14:01, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

You answered my question. Thanks. Rintrah 00:52, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Do you know of any online Latin dictionaries that mark the long and short syllables of the listed words? Rintrah 01:09, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Absent_referent

Hi, I have vastly improved the article Absent referent to address the concerns of you and others. The ghits should now include the expression "absent|missing referent|antecedent". I will include redirects for these variations if needed upon closure of AfD. Please consider changing your vote to KEEP. Thanks for your comments! The pointer to the Sign (linguistics) article was especially helpful. I feel the article is much stronger now, and I have learned much in this process both about the concept and WP in general. --Bhuston 13:39, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] List of songs that have been considered among the greatest ever

I've nominated it for deletion again. As a previous participant in the debate I thought you'd be interested. Duggy 1138 08:17, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can

The article Ascended master, to which you have helped contribute, has been flagged as requiring cleanup.

If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Wikipedia's quality standards. If you are unsure what the nature of the problem is, please discuss this on the article's talk page.
You have been left this message by PocKleanBot, an automated process that notifies editors that articles to which they may have contributed on more than one occasion in the past now need cleanup. If you have any comments or object to this message being left, please leave a message on PocKleanBot's talk page.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../i/h/c/User_talk%7EIhcoyc_6f97.html"