User talk:IHATENAZIPIGS

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hey the name doesn't describe you uniquely. EVERYBODY HATES NAZI PIGS. Would you please choose a different idenifier ? It seems unliklly that a man of Jimbo's declared principles will ban your username. Also he is way too smart to be caught up in a fight that would require him to hold the position that your user name is offensive. Get a new name: this one could be save for instances where a sysop is acting tyranically. It would certainly get everybodies attention when you really want it. If you knew NPOV and use closely resond short posts to make your case then every intelligent person here will will look when and where you alert them.

Your actions show passion, intelligence and daring. Taking the fight to the straight to the Overlord in a panopticon enviroment shows your personal courage. In the triumverate of greatest virtues, Applying the Force of Truth is the most important to the world we live. It combines Will with Wisdom and Love as action on this beautiful garden planet.

Feed your head this:

Every article whose statement depends on a logical fallacy is inherently POV; its the point of view of the stupid! User:Two16

One problem: I don't think there have ever been any Nazi pigs in the course of history. Pigs run around going "oink oink oink," dig up the dirt, and munch on the slop the farmer feeds them. Have any of these animals ever become Nazis? I don't think so. -- Modemac 14:46 Feb 8, 2003 (UTC)

• cough cough* SATIRE *cough cough

*cough* satire died a long time ago, see Nobel Prize and Henry Kissinger and Tom Lehrer. ;-) -- Tarquin 14:49 Feb 8, 2003 (UTC)

How do you explain the War on some drugs, then? -- Modemac 14:51 Feb 8, 2003 (UTC)

On second thoughts, maybe this person means the pigs in Animal Farm. They could be said to become nazis. -- Tarquin 14:49 Feb 8, 2003 (UTC)

The real Nazis are found on the front lines here in the Wikipedia. If you are new: there is no shortage of Fundamentlist of all strips. Jimbo is benevolent and restrains using extraordinarily powers . I think his Mantle would rest on his shoulders much lighter if he never had to don them again. The Wikipedians should be able to take conscious contol over the development of their community. The greatest gift that we could return to Jimbo for making Richard Stallman's Idea real, would be: to build a community where he neverever has to use those powers. Jimbo is set him apart, what could be better than to let him live and contribute to the Wikipedia as a Wikipedian safe in the Knowledge that the community will protect this Free Encyclopedia.

One could argue that NPOV is merely the agreed-upon POV of the majority of Wikipedia users, but I'm not going down that road. I like Wikipedia's attempt to maintain NPOV. And when we enter the Utopia that will allow Jimbo to cease exercising his almighty sysop powers, then I daresay almost everyone here will be happy. -- Modemac 15:32 Feb 8, 2003 (UTC)

If I write "the world is lost on those who have no love of Poetry" will you undestand that poetry is not poems. Nazi Pigs is a metaphor and like a ...like a Nazi Pig is a Simile. Anyone who has English as a first language should be ashamed of themselves if they cannot do furthur analysis of poetical technique on either sentence. Satire would be one. Do youse gets when youse bin satarized? 3/4 points if you don't use the language of English critiicism. Youse have already picked the low hanging fruit, Don't you know how many articles will need to be refactored or rewritten to take this in to account:

• Every article whose statement depends on a logical fallacy is inherently POV; its the point of view of the stupid!

Your username has been blocked indefinitely because it may be rude or inflammatory, unnecessarily long/confusing, too similar to an existing user, contains the name of an organization, website or non-Latin characters, or is otherwise inappropriate (see our blocking and username policies for more information). You are encouraged to create a new account and contribute to Wikipedia under a more appropriate username, and in a constructive manner. Wikipedia:Username provides guidance on selecting an appropriate username. You may also edit Wikipedia without creating an account. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia under an inappropriate username. If you would like to discuss the block, you may edit your talk page or email the administrator who blocked you.

Due to Wikipedia's mechanism for enforcing name changes, your IP address may be temporarily blocked. Unless you have also been engaging in vandalism or impersonation of another user, we will remove that block as soon as possible — if this doesn't happen within an hour or so, please email an administrator and explain the situation (see the list of administrators).

If you want to keep the contributions from your old account for your new username, please follow these directions: (1) Add {{unblock-un|new username}} to your user talk page. This is possible because even when you are blocked, you can still edit your own talk page. (2) Soon, an admin may come to unblock you. (3) You will have 24 hours after the unblock to file a request on Wikipedia:Changing username before you may be re-blocked. Note that this can only be done before you create the new one. For more information, please visit Wikipedia:Changing username. In many cases (especially if your account has few or no edits), it is a lot easier to create a new account.