User talk:Ignat99

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Ternary_logic

IMHO, You have problem with ternary logic. Plz, change back the article. Ignat99 16:30, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

The article has been cleared by Simões on concrens about unreferenced material. Knorlin says he's re-writing it: Talk:Ternary_logic#Proposed_revamp. If you have knowledge about the topic, you could be a help with the article. (I know your English is shaky, but you say you were involved with Setun.) If it seems to be taking too much time, you'd be welcome to contribute at the Ternary Logic article or talk page. But your line, "It is false - false or true ? :-)" was not understood. --Loqi T. 11:45, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

You wrote:

IMHO, You have problem with ternary logic. Plz, change back the article. We maked Setun, we understand it. Ignat99 16:39, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Aristotlean logic which provides for true and false and .

It is true! Ignat99 14:10, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm not exactly sure what you mean when you say "we" made Setun. Do you mean your fellow former Soviets (in the same way "we" qua United States and the Soviet Union won World War II)? Royal "we"? The multiple people who are using the User:Ignat99 account? You'll have to clarify that point for me.

In any event, I've read the Organon and have never seen any definitive statements on trivalentism in it. It's sometimes said that Aristotle kicked the idea around in On Interpretation, but what is today called "Aristotelian logic" is his work on syllogisms. If you think otherwise, you'll have to cite the work and section number. For now, I've reverted your edit made to the ternary logic article. Simões (^talk/_contribs) 19:51, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

I mean the Soviet Union and my schools of thought (Moscow Institute of Electronic Technology) and my teacher ([Nikolai Brusentsov http://www.icfcst.kiev.ua/MUSEUM/Brusentsov.html]) and our (russian) philosophers. Ignat99 06:59, 1 December 2006 (UTC)