Talk:Hutchison Whampoa
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Bias?
Just like to point out that two thirds of this article consists of Whampoa's "strong links to the Communist party" and plots by the company to control the Pentagon and Panama Canal. One sentence (and a short one at that), is devoted to the opposing point of view. I'd also like to point out that many of the "sources" listed are arch-conservative think tanks and organizations. There aren't any quotes from people who are actually innvolved with the company.Also like to point out that the source of the "declassified intelligence report" is judicialwatch.org, one of the "conservative critics of China." Now I'm only an innocent reader, but it occurs to me that it would be a whole lot more factual if this "declassified intelligence report" were taken from an actual goverment institution's website. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.247.174.215 (talk • contribs).
- I've removed the section on the intelligence report, as the credibility of the source is in question. Would be rather different if they provided a copy or a link to a copy of the document itself. The section says the material is in a report, however, the single link is only enough to back up a claim of "Group X claims that Report Y contains ...", which gets a little tenuous. 81.104.165.184 16:31, 21 May 2006 (UTC)