User talk:Humblefool
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please be civil, and know that I will respond soon-ish to you on your own talk page. I don't delete stuff, even flames or spam, I just archive.
Contents |
[edit] Skulltag
Hey, I'm not quite sure I understand why you deleted this article. Those guidelines were proposed. They havn't been adopted yet, meaning that they pretty much don't stand for anything yet. Almost all of the software listed on Wikipedia violates those guidelines. Why not delete all of them as well? I think that this was unfair to the Skulltag community. HarrisonHopkins 22:56, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
If you could recreate at that link for me to move somewhere else I would greatly appreciate it. HarrisonHopkins 23:17, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] sino-british joint declaration
Hey, I helped you to add a tag for purposing deletion for this topic. Chinamen have no right to write down this topic, how dare they can create this topic talking about superior race of British people. Don't worry Humblefool, I will help you. I believe that this topic will be deleted in 5 days. Let us co-operate to eradicate all Chinese-related topics. : ) 70.52.74.207 00:40, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] immigration to Macau
I also added a tag for deletion for this topic. So don't worry, I will help you to delete all related subtopics of Hong Kong and Macau as many as possible. Next topic I am seeking now, and I will let you know later on. Again, don't worry I will help you to eradicate all inferior Chinese related topics whether it is copyvio or not.70.52.74.207 00:09, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] immigration to Hong Kong
excuse me, can you tell me why you reverted what I wrote in this article?70.52.75.136 03:32, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
-
- I think this topic will be disappeared in 5 days, don't worry. Now I am going to add a tag for purposing deletion of other topics of Hong Kong and Macau, namely sports, economy, demographic, climate, etc, I think that these topics are more or less copyvio that they should be deleted right away. 70.52.74.207 00:19, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- I already helped you to add more tags for deletion for the Hong Kong related topics like economy, climate, history or the like. I hope these topics can be eradicated in 5 days as we wish. 70.52.74.207 00:29, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
-
[edit] Space Tree
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=Space_Tree
You previously deleted Space Tree and now it has been recreated, could you please delete this again. --Simonkoldyk 21:59, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. --Simonkoldyk 00:56, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm confused as to why Space Tree is repeatedly deleted, it has a large fan base and is part of Keen Toons pages such as Evil Josh & Billy have not been taken down, yet they have fewer episodes and followings as Space Tree. --freakybeastie 01:42, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 21:34, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Digital Opportunity Index (DOI) AfD
The "non-notable business" that you thought was behind the Digital Opportunity Index (DOI) article turns out to be the International Telecommunications Union, an agency of the UN, which is both notable and not a business. I've rewritten the article to make this more clear, and I've added information about the index to the ITU article, and I'm suggesting merge or keep. I invite you to reconsider your vote. cheers --Xtifr tälk 11:24, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Space Tree deletion
Hi. Just wondering about the Space Tree article you deleted three times. Talk:Space Tree mentions that it was only deleted because someone inserted a lot of copyvio. I think it might have some merit since the article was created in February 2005 and was never been so much as AFD'ed in over 1½ years. Just wondering if you had investigated whether the article could have been reverted to remove copyvio rather than deleted. Thanks. —Wknight94 (talk) 19:03, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Relist?
I should point out that (unlike AFD, but like RFD and CFD) TFD has traditionally employed the reasoning that if nobody objects, the template can be deleted - this is mainly because the page is rather long and tends to be backlogged, and suggesting that nominations with "no objections" should be relisted is basically encouraging people to rubberstamp everything. Note that TFD is watched by a lot of people and it is unlikely for them to miss a nomination they would have objected to. The reason we're extra cautious about AFD is that articles are actual content, and templates/categories/redirects are meta-content. Yours, (Radiant) 14:51, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- The harm is in increasing the backlog of an already backlogged process, and more importantly in encouraging the mentality that people must explicitly endorse obvious cases they already agree with, or the idea that some sort of quorum must exist for process. What I'd personally do if I'm unsure how to close something is add my own keep-or-delete comment (thus clarifying the situation) and leave it for another admin to deal with. (Radiant) 09:53, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Result of the debate
Since when was the result of the discussion "delete" for the "History of Turkic Civilization" template? I have a feeling that you didn't even look at my last post to the talk page.. The number of delete votes was not so much more then keep votes, and that only considering that some delete voters actually campaigned for votes.. The reason the template linked to many pages where it was not listed on was because the template had been protected because of edit-warring. And the idea behind is not some "nasty" pan-turkic bias, Turks have not been a sedentary nation, please read the arguments more carefully before closing a vote and calling people's ideas "nasty". Even though I have not created this template, I think it is always a better idea to try to "improve" than be a "deletionist".Baristarim 10:00, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
- I'm strongly agree with Baristarim. I also want to make some comments about your decision for the template but please do not consider this as an interference. The template was protected, otherwise, it could be improved. Even in this case, the number of keep votes (27) was higher than the delete votes (25). There are similar controversial issues voted before, i want to give an example, [|here]. If you check this voting, you'll see that the number of delete (12) votes was higher than the keeps (7), but the page was not deleted. Changing the title solved the debate. In my opinion, the similiar kind of decision would be a better solution. I should also admit that your statements seems to me slightly biased. Regards. E104421 16:29, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
- Your comment was quite POV, I would expect better from an admin. Otherwise I believe E104421 and Baristarim already said what I wanted to. Armanalp 18:50, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WP Munich template
What was the change you did to WikiProject Munich template? Kingjeff 21:00, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] User:Timecop
You said: "I have undeleted and unblocked Timecop's stuff. He's been doing this for over a year, and most of it's been by-the-book Afd'ing. Digg is very good at making things seem bigger than they are."
- As you wish, although my deletion was supported by at least one other person. I encourage you to make note of this at WP:AN. I will not engage in a wheel war with you, and I thank you for looking into it. I disagree with your decision but I'll let it stand. --Yamla 03:33, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
User:Timecop has become a topic of discussion here: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#The old userbox question. I am letting you know because you had contested an earlier attempt to block this user. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 01:36, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
