Talk:Humanity's Team
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page was written by Ben Samuel moretree5@yahoo.co.uk, a London member. I invite anyone tempted to delete this page to talk to me first, as I am keen to find out how I could make the entry better.
Ok: I added a couple of Wiki links, What you could add is: Who is Neale Donald Walsch? The entry doesn't make it clear whether the organisation exists or was just a hypothetical one mentioned in the book. (thought your comment makes it clear that it does exist) When was the book published? How long has the organisation been going? Estimates of hoow many members, countries? This is googlable, think, but someone who knows about it could prbably be more accurate Malcolm Farmer 14:58, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- This page seems to be written from a non-neutral POV in favor of the group and its goals, therefore I am adding an NNPOV warning. --Jdemarcos 17:03, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your comments about the entry. I have adjusted it and hope this adjustment removes any suggestions of bias. It was certainly not my intention to write anything that suggested a non-neutral point of view. I suggest now that we remove the tag. --User:GerryHarrington
- Thanks for your adjustments, but the information beginning with "The conference revealed a trend in which people around the world are opening their minds to the possibility that our current theologies may be limited in what they understand..." and what follows still seems a favorable report of the group's activities and goals. Therefore I think the warning should stay for now. --Jdemarcos 11:05, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for your latest comments. I have further adjusted the copy and believe these latest adjustments align the article with a neutral point of view, which I certainly want the article to have. I recommend that we now remove the tag. --User:GerryHarrington
I agree with the previous commentators that this article is non-neutral. It is so obvious that the author is a supporter of this movement. I think that the movement's claim that it is NOT a religion can be disputed. Would like to read some more critic voices on HT and Neale Donald Walsch.. User:Peace
I've slapped the NPOV tag on this page. It reads like a flyer for the movement. Lord Patrick 02:50, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
What questions do you have about the entry, Lord Patrick, and how do you think it could be made neutral?
The article contains no skepticism, criticism, and in general has a favourable view to the movement. We do not have this sort of pseudo advertising (written in a way that belongs on the Simple Wiki) on the Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Scientology, Wicca, Satanism, Raelianism, or any other religion or cults page. Was its creator a member of the movement? Because it sure reads like it, and User:Peace can back this up. Lord Patrick 21:05, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
