User talk:Hrana98

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Maybe this wont work as Ive never tried it but can we talk this over Hrana 21? Clik right I am here.67.188.110.197

Well, I don't know what you want to talk about. When I requested Talk:Islamism be semi-protected, it was meant to stop people censoring comments and trolling. Hrana98 18:45, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

"It is becoming quite clear that you are an argumentative editor with paranoid delusions." That's inappropriate and uncivil. This bickering doesn't belong on the talk page. The way to keep it off the talk page is to stop posting it and stop responding to it. You gain nothing by trying to have the last word, and you risk further disruption to the page. Tom Harrison ^Talk 10:59, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

I appreciate your commentary. However, Timothy Usher has now decided to wage war on my user account over at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Deuterium. I certainly hope you'll be banning any user that resorts to this behavior. Hrana98 10:54, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Contents 1 Request for comment 2 One or the other 3 You are being attacked 4 Resolving your wiki dispute

[edit] Request for comment

Could you please comment on this? Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Template:No_Crusade Good day. 24.7.141.159 21:23, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

That's a nice touch.Timothy Usher 21:59, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] One or the other

One or the other. That's all I'm asking.Timothy Usher 13:19, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Why are you spamming my talk page with cryptic nonsense? Hrana98 21:30, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] You are being attacked

Timothy Usher and his sock/meat puppet Pecher have not stopped their attacks. Go to the Administrators noticeboard and see what they are doing. They claim that I am you. It also looks like the Admins of Wikipedia will support Timothy Usher because they support anyone critical of bringing Islam-related articles back to NPOV. User247 03:57, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

You posted a great letter. Let's hope the Admin's act on it now. User247 17:34, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Resolving your wiki dispute

Greetings, Hrana98. I think the best way to approach the above dispute would be to come to an understanding (read: détente) on the content front between the two parties involved — controversially, regardless of who or how many real-life account holders there are or whom they are affiliated with. If both sides are interested, we can move on to outline the major points of contention and hopefuly we'll be able to arrive at some sort of an agreed-upon middleway from there. Let me know what you think and what you find these points to be. Thanks in advance. El_C 04:00, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

I'm game. TIA. Hrana98 10:01, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Hi again. Sorry, Timothy Usher was not receptive to my mediation idea and it appears likely he will opt for more formal proceedings. El_C 12:16, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

That's not entirely correct. I'd be delighted to solve this. What I'm not willing to do is pretend to solve it between my primary account and one of your socks while allowing the Deuterium, Slashdot and similar stuff to continue. I *am* willing to overlook anything which has transpired thusfar, as long as we can ensure it won't continue. And I, like El C, am curious to hear what you want from me. Ask, and you just might get it.Timothy Usher 12:57, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

I hate to litter another user's talk page with an argument but I disagree with your statement. Are you saying you have multiple accounsts and therefore sockpuppets when you mention primary account? I find that interesting to say the least. Have you used your sockpuppets to attack both this user, myself and others? Is Pecher your sockpuppet? Actually, I think I am more than willing to overlook Timothy Ushers accusations of calling me an Islamist, a murderer and his constant harassment without any conditions if El_C continues doing the great job he/she is. Everyone has been asking you to abide by the rules, stop the revert wars, stop the harassment and name calling, stop using multiple sockpuppets, stop pushing your negative agenda against Islam, stop the meaningless argument, stop censoring people's comments, stop banning users who don't agree with you, stop asking for Administrators to ban anyone you happen to not like, stop labeling me a sockpuppet of another user without proof, changing your negative attitude, etc. I'm asking the same. I have no desire to play games with you when you say that I just might get what I want. If you can't be a part of this community with our rules then maybe its better you leave before an Admin decides to ban you for your conduct. User247 19:07, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

That was not what was meant by "primary account". You're welcome to open an investigation if you like, as I've nothing to hide. I'm sorry to have bothered you here.Timothy Usher 21:06, 18 April 2006 (UTC)